Skip to main content

Root and Shoot Peroxidase Activity in Festuca arundinacea in Light Oil-Contaminated Soil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Phytoremediation for Green Energy

Abstract

Peroxidases are a group of enzymes that occur especially in plant cells. They are classified as oxido-reductases and are given the official EC number 1.11.1. For many of these enzymes the optimal substrate is hydrogen peroxide, but others are more active with organic hydroperoxides such as lipid peroxides. Peroxidases can contain a heme cofactor in their active sites, or redox-active cysteine or selenocysteine residues. Toxic molecules such as superoxide and hydroxide radicals can be found in cells due to the presence of oxygen. These are byproducts of aerobic respiration. They are eliminated by a number of enzymes present inside the cell such as peroxidases. Some oil-producing countries may encounter the risk of soil pollution by oil, during transportation, extraction and refining of crude oil. Oil-contaminated soil can be hazardous to plants and soil microorganisms. Among the plants, grasses such as Festuca arundinacea (Tall fescue) and legumes have high potential on removal of oil from contaminated soil. In the process of phytoremediation of crude oil, some morphological, enzymatic and physiological changes were observed in plants. In this study, the effect of light crude oil (5 % v/w) in soil on the activity of peroxidase was studied and compared with control. Our results showed that in both roots and shoots, the Km and Vmax of the enzyme were changed. The contaminated soil caused delay of germination and chlorosis in plants. In the contaminated soil, the Km of root peroxidase was determined to be about 55.5 µM while it was 91 µM in control. The Vmax of root’s enzyme was 2 and 6 nmol/mg protein/min in contaminated soil and control, respectively. The Km of enzyme in shoots was determined to be about 36 and 42 µM in contaminated soil and control, respectively, while the Vmax in control was about 1.4 nmol/mg protein/min and it decreased to 1 nmol/mg protein/min in contaminated soil. The specific activity of enzyme in root control was 5.3 × 10−3 U/mg protein while it was 3.5 × 10−3 U/mg protein in contaminated roots. The specific activity of enzyme in shoots was 1.8 × 10−3 and 1.7 × 10−3 U/mg protein in control and contaminated soil respectively. Our results propose that in the root grown in contaminated soil, the plant uses peroxidase isoform in comparison with control roots, while in the shoots the same peroxidase was used in the plant in both contaminated and control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam G, Duncan HJ (1999) Effect of diesel fuel on growth of selected plant species. Environ Geochem Health 21(4):353–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adam G, Duncan H (2002) Influence of diesel fuel on seed germination. Environ Pollut 120(2):363–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bučková M, Godočíková J, Zámocký M, Polek B (2010) Screening of bacterial isolates from polluted soils exhibiting catalase and peroxidase activity and diversity of their responses to oxidative stress. Curr Microbiol 61(4):241–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cerniglia CE (1992) Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Biodegradation 3:354–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz KJ, Horling F, Konig J, Baier M (2002) The function of the chloroplast 2-cysteine peroxiredoxin in peroxide detoxification and its regulation. J Exp Bot 53:1321–1329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan CY, Krishnamurthy S (1995) Enzymes for enhancing bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils: a brief review. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 45(6):453–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gong P, Wilke BM, Strozzi E, Fleischmann S (2001) Evaluation and refinement of a continuous seed germination and early seedling growth test for the use in the ecotoxicological assessment of soils. Chemosphere 44(3):491–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonsalo J, Jørgensen KS, Haahtela K, Sen R (2000) Effects of Pinus sylvestris root growth and mycorrhizosphere development on bacterial carbon source utilization and hydrocarbon oxidation in forest and petroleum-contaminated soils. Can J Microbiol 46(5):451–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann B, Hecht HJ, Flohe L (2002) Peroxiredoxins. Biol Chem 383:347–364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kathi S, Khan AB (2011) Phytoremediation approaches to PAH contaminated soil. Indian J Sci Technol 4(1):56–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masakorala K, Yao J, Guo H, Chandankere R, Wang J, Cai M, Liu H, Choi MFC (2013) Phytotoxicity of long-term total petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil—a comparative and combined approach. Water Air Soil Pollut 224(5):1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minai-Tehrani D (2008) Effect of heavy crude oil-contaminated soil on germination and growth of Poa trivialis (Rough meadow-grass). Arch Agron Soil Sci 54:83–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naemi N, Minaee-Tehrani D, Laameh-Rad B (2011) Change of peroxidase activity of lentil (Lens culinaris) in the presence of light crude oil in soil. Clin Biochem 44(13):S252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogboghodo IA, Iruaga EK, Osemwota IO, Chokor JU (2004) An assessment of the effects of crude oil pollution on soil properties, germination and growth of maize (Zea mays) using two crude types—forcados light and Escravos light. Environ Monit Assess 96(1–3):143–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riser-Roberts E (2010) Remediation of petroleum contaminated soils: biological, physical, and chemical processes. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacy RAP, Munthe E, Steinum T, Sharma B, Reidunn AB (1996) A peroxiredoxin antioxidant is encoded by a dormancy-related gene, Per1, expressed during late development in the aleurone and embryo of barley grains. Plant Mol Biol 31:1205–1216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood ZA, Schroder E, Harris JR, Poole LB (2003) Structure, mechanism and regulation of peroxiredoxins. Trends Biochem Sci 28:32–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dariush Minai-Tehrani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ghaffari, Z., Shademan, S., Sobhani-Damavandifar, Z., Minai-Tehrani, D. (2015). Root and Shoot Peroxidase Activity in Festuca arundinacea in Light Oil-Contaminated Soil. In: Öztürk, M., Ashraf, M., Aksoy, A., Ahmad, M. (eds) Phytoremediation for Green Energy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7887-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics