Abstract
Singapore is a city-state in South East Asia with a stable political system and an export and services-oriented economy. Generally, women enjoy gender equality in terms of opportunities to education, jobs and resources. Insights into how gender may influence quality-of-life issues are gleaned from the results of a nation-wide survey of 1500 Singapore citizens conducted in 2011. We report the correlations between gender and quality-of-life measures such as life satisfaction, satisfaction with living in Singapore, happiness, enjoyment, achievement, psychological flourishing, emotional wellbeing and economic wellbeing. We also show how women and men differ in their choice of personal values and what is important to their wellbeing.
Generally, women reported slightly lower levels of satisfaction across various life domains (e.g., familial relationships, friendships and jobs). Both women and men were happier and enjoyed their lives more in 2011 compared to 2006. Women also felt a greater sense of achievement. Women and men were fairly similar in their assessment of emotional wellbeing, psychological flourishing and economic wellbeing. Women were more likely to enhance their psychological wellbeing by being good people and leading good lives while men preferred to focus on being engaged and interested in their daily activities. For the personal values that are important to Singaporeans, both women and men emphasized security, self respect, warm relationships with others and sense of belonging.
In the Singapore context, it appears that gender differences are muted. However, the analysis of gender together with other demographic variables (e.g., age, education, marital status and personal income) helped to shed light on different groups of women and their concerns with quality-of-life issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1974). Developing measures of perceived life quality: Results from several national surveys. Social Indicators Research, 1, 1–26.
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2000). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Davis, E. E., Fine-Davis, M., & Meehan, G. (1982). Demographic determinants of perceived wellbeing in eight European countries. Social Indicators Research, 10, 341–335.
Department of Statistics Singapore. (2013). www.singstat.gov.sg. Accessed 5 June 2013.
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. New York: Blackwell.
Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E. M., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 419–436.
Eckermann, E. (2012). The quality of life of adults, in Land, Kenneth C.; Michalos, Alex C. and Sirgy, M. Joseph (eds), Handbook of Social Indicators and Quality of Life Research, New York: Springer, 373–380.
Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 138–150.
Inoguchi, T., & Fujii, S. (2009). The quality of life in Japan. Social Indicators Research, 92, 227–262.
Kahle, L. R. (1983). Social values and social change: Adaptation to life in America. New York: Praeger.
Kau, A. K., Tan, S. J., & Wirtz, J. (1998). Seven faces of Singaporeans: Their values, aspirations and lifestyles. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Kau, A. K., Jung, K., Tambyah, S. K., & Tan, S. J. (2004). Understanding Singaporeans: Values, lifestyles, aspirations and consumption behaviors. Singapore: World Scientific Press Co. Pte Ltd.
Mercer Human Resource Consultancy. (2012). 2012 Worldwide quality of living survey. http://www.mercer.com/qualityoflivingpr#city-rankings. Accessed 7 June 2013.
Michalos, A. C. (1986). Job satisfaction, marital satisfaction, and the quality of life: A review and a preview in research on the quality of life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Survey Research Centre.
Ministry of Manpower. (2013). http://www.mom.gov.sg/statistics-publications/national-labour-market-information/statistics/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 6 June 2013.
Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815–1831.
Tambyah, S. K., Tan, S. J., & Kau, A. K. (2010). The wellbeing of Singaporeans. Singapore: World Scientific.
Tambyah, S. K. and Tan S. J. (2013), Happiness and Wellbeing: The Singaporean Experience, UK: Routledge.
United Nations Development Programme. (2013). Human development index—2012 rankings. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR2013_EN_Summary.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2013.
Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Holland: D. Reidel.
Veroff, J., Douvan, E., & Kulka, R. A. (1981). The inner American: A self-portrait from 1957 to 1976. New York: Basic Books.
Wood, W., Rhodes, N., & Whelan, W. (1989). Sex differences in positive well-being: A consideration of emotional style and marital status. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 249–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tambyah, S., Tan, S. (2014). Gender and Quality of Life in Singapore. In: Eckermann, E. (eds) Gender, Lifespan and Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 53. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7829-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7829-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7828-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7829-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)