Skip to main content

Design and Development of Teaching-Learning Sequence (TLS) Materials Around Us: Description of an Iterative Process

  • Chapter
Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences

Abstract

The case described in this chapter is the iterative design and development process of an inquiry-based industry site visit teaching-learning sequence (TLS) – materials around us. In order to enhance students’ motivation and interest towards their science studies and promote learning about materials science-related topics, the TLS encompasses an industry site visit and activities related to it. The TLS is designed following the principles of the design-based research (DBR) approach. The iterative design process started with a review of relevant research literature and took place in four cycles. In each cycle, the TLS was tested with ordinary teachers, problems in the procedure were uncovered, and they were rectified. During the testing, versatile case study data were collected and analyzed employing mixed methods. The participating teachers’ and students’ (aged 13–15 years) experiences concerning the TLS were examined with pre- and post-questionnaires and interviews. Differences between pre- and post-questionnaire data were analyzed by t-tests, whereas data from the interviews were categorized according to motivation and interest theories. External observers observed the implementation and wrote evaluation reports. Based on the analysis of the data, the TLS was re-designed and refined after every cycle. As a result of the process, a student book and a teacher guide were designed and published. This chapter focuses on the problematic aspects of the design that emerged during the implementations, changes that were made, and how the changes were justified based on the data that were collected during the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ESIAQ is based on Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI),http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/intrins.html

  2. 2.

    AMQ is based on the Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A) and Academic Motivation Scale (AMA), http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/intrins.html.

References

  • Andersson, R.D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula.In S.K. Abell& N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 807–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, C., Fisher, N., & Taylor, B. (2002). Finding physics in the real world: How to teach physics effectively with visits. Physics Education, 37(1), 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. C. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braund, M., & Reiss, M. J. (2004). Learning science outside the classroom. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braund, M., Reiss, M., Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Moussouri, T. (2008). Getting the most from ‘Out-of-School’ learning in science: What should teachers know? Available at http://www.ase.org.uk/htm/conferences/atsi/pdf/F9.pdf. Visited 15 July 2008.

  • Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behaviour: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–69). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C. (2006). Balancing innovation and risk. Assessing design research proposals. In a book J. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2005). Europeans, science and technology. Eurobarometer 224. Brussels: The Directorate General Press and Communication of the European Commission. Retrieved November, 2007, from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_224_report_en.pdf

  • Falk, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 89, 744–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the students in school groups. Science Education, 88, 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2016). Pragmatic design-based research – Designing as a shared activity of teachers and researches. In D. Psillos & P. Kariotoglou (Eds.), Iterative design of teaching-learning sequences: Introducing the science of materials in European schools. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Aksela, M., & Meisalo, V. (2009). Adoption of ICT in Science Education: A case study of communication channels in a teachers’ professional development project. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(2), 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. (2005). Understanding elementary teacher motivations for science fieldtrips. Science Education, 89(6), 936–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (2007). An educational–psychological conceptualisation of interest. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuitunen, H., & Meisalo, V. (1988). Science and technology education and industry. In C. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education 2 (pp. 141–154). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, S., Liston, C., Thiery, H., & Graf, J. (2007). What good is a scientist in the classroom? Participant outcomes and program design features for a short- duration science outreach intervention in K–12 classrooms. Life Sciences Education, 6, 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne, G. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Miquelon, P. (2007). A motivational model of persistence in science education: A self-determination theory approach. European Journal of Psvchology of Education, 22(3), 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavonen, J., & Laaksonen, S. (2009). Context of teaching and learning school science in Finland: Reflections on PISA 2006 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 922–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavonen, J., Jauhiainen, J., Koponen, I., & Kurki-Suonio, K. (2004). Effect of a long term in-service training program on teachers’ beliefs about the role of experiments in physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., Byman, R., Uitto, A., & Meisalo, V. (2006a). Job characteristics found important for their future career choice by ninth grade students. In S. Yoong, M. Ismail, A. Nurulazam, F. Salleh, F. S. Fook, L. C. Sam, & M. N. L. Yan (Eds.), Proceedings of the XII IOSTE SYMPOSIUM: Science and technology education in the Service of Humankind, 30 July–4 August 2006. School of Educational Studies, UniversitiSains Malaysia, Penang

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., Aksela, M., & Meisalo, V. (2006b). A professional development project for improving the use of ICT in science teaching. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15(2), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavonen, J., Byman, R., Uitto, A., Juuti, K., & Meisalo, V. (2008a). Students’ interest and experiences in physics and chemistry related themes: Reflections based on a ROSE-survey in Finland. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 1(1), 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavonen, J., Gedrovics, J., Byman, R., Meisalo, V., Juuti, K., & Uitto, A. (2008b). Students’ motivational orientations and career choice in science and technology: A survey in Finland and Latvia. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(2), 86–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavonen, J., Laherto, A., Loukomies, A., Juuti, K., Kim, M., Lampiselkä, J., & Meisalo, V. (2009a). Enhancing scientific literacy through the industry site visit. In S. Rodrigues (Ed.), Multiple literacy and science education: ICTs in formal and informal learning environments. Hershey: IGI/Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavonen, J., Loukomies, A., Meisalo, V., Ampuja, A., Juuti, K., Lampiselkä, J., & Jansson, J. (2009b). Materials around us: Paper, metal and plastics: Student book. Helsinki: Economic Information Office. 47 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukomies, A., Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., Lampiselkä, J., Meisalo, V., Ampuja, A., & Jansson, J. (2009a). Materials around us: Paper, metal and plastics: Teacher guide. Helsinki: Economic Information Office. 54 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukomies, A., Lavonen, J. & Juuti, K. (2009b). The motivational features of an industry site visit. In Proceedings of ESERA 2009 conference. Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukomies, A., Pnevmatikos, D., Lavonen, J., Spyrtou, A., Byman, R., Kariotoglou, P., & Juuti, K. (2013). Promoting students’ interest and motivation towards science learning: The role of personal needs and motivation orientations. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2517–2539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margel, H., Eylon, B.-S., & Scherz, Z. (2008). A longitudinal study of junior high school students’ conceptions of the structure of materials. Journal or Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 132–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. (2004). An emerging research framework for studying informal learning and schools. Science Education, 88, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minner, D., Levy, A., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction – What is it and does it matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCCBE. (2004). National core curriculum for basic education 2004. Helsinki: National Board of Education [Electronic Version] from http://www.oph.fi/english/page.asp?path=447,27598,37840,72101,72106

  • Palmer, D. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2007). Motivation in education. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. (2008). Interest – The curios emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storksdieck, M. (2001). Differences in teachers’ and students’ museum field-trip experiences. Visitor Studies Today! 4(1), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. In Applied social research methods series volume 5 (2nd ed., pp. 79–101). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anni Loukomies .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: ESIAQ

EVALUATION OF SCIENCE INQUIRY ACTIVITIES STUDENT NUMBER: ______________________

DATE: ______________________ COUNTRY: _______________________NAME: ____________________

For each of the following statements dealing with scientific inquiry activities, please indicate how true it is for you, using the following scale: not at all true (1)very true (7)

 

When I engage in a science inquiry activity

not at all true

 

somewhat true

  

very true

1.

I enjoy the activity very much

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2.

I think I am pretty good at the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

3.

I put a lot of effort into the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

4.

I do not feel nervous at all while doing the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

5.

I believe I had some choice about doing the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

6.

I believe the activity has some value for me

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

7.

I feel really distant from my peers while doing the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8.

The activity is fun to do

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9.

I think I do the activity pretty well, compared to other students

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

10.

I don’t try very hard to do well at the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

11.

I feel very tense while doing the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

12.

I feel like it was not my own choice to do the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

13.

I think that doing the activity is useful for my science studies

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

14.

I really doubt that my peers and I would ever be friends through the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

15.

The activity is boring

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

16.

After working at the activity for a while I feel pretty competent

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

17.

I try very hard to do the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

18.

It is important to me to do well at the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

19.

I am very relaxed while doing the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

20.

I don’t really have a choice about doing the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

21.

I think the activity is important to do because it can help me in learning

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

22.

I feel I can really trust my peers participating in the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

23.

The activity does not hold my attention at all

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

24.

I am satisfied with my performance for the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

25.

I don’t put much energy into the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

26.

I am anxious while working on the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

27.

I feel that I have to do the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

28.

I would be willing to do similar activities more because they have value for me

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

29.

I’d like to interact with my peers participating in the activity more often

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

30.

I would describe the activity as very interesting

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

31.

I am pretty skilled at the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

32.

I feel pressured while doing the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

33.

I do the activity because I have no other choice

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

34.

I think doing the activity could help me to learn science

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

35.

I feel close to my peers during the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

36.

I think the activity is quite enjoyable

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

37.

I couldn’t do the activity very well

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

38.

I do the activity because I want to do it

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

39.

I believe that doing the activity could be beneficial for me

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

40.

I don’t feel like I could really trust my peers who are participating in the activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

41.

When I am doing the activity, I think about how much I am enjoying it

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

42.

I do the activity because I have to do

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

43.

I think the activity is an important activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Appendix 2: AMQ

ACADEMIC MOTIVATION FOR LEARNING SCIENCE STUDENT NUMBER: _______________

DATE: ____________________ COUNTRY: ______________________ NAME: _______________________________

WHY DO I LEARN SCIENCE?

Using the scale below indicate to what extent each of the following items presently corresponds to one of the reasons why you learn science.

For each of the following statements dealing with scientific inquiry activities, please indicate how true it is for you, using the following scale: not at all true (1)very true (7)

 

Why do I learn science?

Does not correspond at all

 

Corresponds moderately

  

Corresponds exactly

1.

Because I have the impression that it is expected of me

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2.

To show myself that I am a good student

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

3.

Because I choose to be the kind of person who will know many things as an adult

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

4.

Because it’s important to me to learn science

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

5.

Because I enjoy the feeling of acquiring knowledge about science

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

6.

For the enjoyment I experience when I grasp a difficult subject in science

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

7.

Because it will help me make a better choice regarding my career orientation

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8.

For the “high” feeling that I experience when I am having discussions with interesting science teachers

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9.

Because studying science allows me to continue to learn about many things that interest me

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

10.

Because I think it is good for my personal development

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

11.

For the pleasure that I experience in knowing more about science

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

12.

Because I would feel ashamed if I couldn’t discuss with my friends about things concerning science

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

13.

I don’t know why I study science, and frankly, I don’t give a damn

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

14.

In order to get a more prestigious job later on

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

15.

For the “high” feeling that I experience while reading about various interesting science subjects

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

16.

Because science learning allows me to experience a personal satisfaction in my quest for excellence in my studies

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

17.

Because I really like science learning

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

18.

Because I would feel guilty if I didn’t study science

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

19.

Because I’ll get in trouble if I don’t do so

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

20.

For the pleasure I experience when surpassing myself in science studies

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

21.

Honestly, I don’t know, I truly have the impression of wasting my time in studying science

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

22.

I once had good reasons for learning science; however, now I wonder whether I should continue

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

23.

Because I choose to be the kind of person who knows matters concerning science

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

24.

For the satisfaction I feel when I am in the process of accomplishing difficult exercises in science

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

25.

Because I want the teacher to think I’m a good student

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

26.

For the satisfied feeling I get in finding out new things

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

27.

Because for me, science learning is fun

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

28.

I don’t know why I am studying science

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

29.

In order to have a better salary later on

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Appendix 3: Interview Questions

3.1 Semi-Structured Interview, Questions

Guided questions or themes discussed with the students during the interview.

3.2 Part 1: Motivation

3.2.1 Orientation

Can you please tell me about the site visit and the learning tasks related to it?

  1. 1.

    What was most interesting or motivating in the site visit TLS?

    • What else was interesting or motivating?

    • Ask about the following features of the site visit if the student does not mention anything about them.

  2. 2.

    What kinds of possibilities to influence the way things were done during the site visit TLS did you have?

    • Was it interesting or motivating to have an influence on the way things were done during the site visit TLS?

    • Did you have possibilities to plan the learning activities?

    • Did you have an influence on the way the learning tasks were done?

    • Did you have an influence on choosing the learning tasks?

    • Did you have an influence on the order the learning tasks were done?

    • What else were you allowed to decide about?

    • Was it nice to influence the way things were done during the site visit TLS?

  3. 3.

    What kinds of possibilities to work together with your classmates did you have during the site visit TLS?

    • Did working together with your classmates increase your motivation or interest towards studying?

    • Did you feel close to your group members?

    • Was it nice to work together with the other pupils?

    • Did you have a possibility to plan the learning activities with the other pupils?

  4. 4.

    Did you feel competent during the learning tasks related to the site visit?

    • Are you sure you were competent?

    • Did feeling competent increase your interest or motivation towards studying?

    • What made you feel yourself competent? (Was it your own, your teacher’s or other pupils’ view?)

    • Did you feel competent during the ICT tasks related to the site visit TLS?

    • Did you feel your competency was appreciated?

    • Could you do well some other thing related to the site visit TLS?

  5. 5.

    Can you please tell me about your feeling of interest and enjoyment during the site visit TLS.

    • Did you feel convenient during the learning tasks related to the site visit?

    • Did your feeling of interest and enjoyment have an influence on your interest and motivation towards the site visit TLS?

    • What learning tasks affected your interest most during the site visit TLS?

  6. 6.

    Can you please tell me about the motivating or interesting content or context of the TLS.

  7. 7.

    Overall, what do you think about the TLS?

3.3 Part 2: Learning

  1. 8.

    What do you know about products of the site visit company?

    • Do you know, what materials the products is made of?

    • Do you know, how are products manufactured from materials? What is the manufacturing process of a product like?

    • Do you know, what properties the products have?

    • Do you know, where are the products are used?

  2. 9.

    What do you know about the materials used in the company?

    • Do you know, what raw materials are used to produce materials the company uses and where these materials come from?

    • Do you know, how the materials are manufactured from raw materials?

    • Do you know, what properties these materials have?

    • Do you know, how the properties of the materials are analysed?

    • Do you know, a simple structural mode that explains a property of the material, describes the structure of each material?

  3. 10.

    What do you know about the occupations in the site visit company?

    • Do you know, what kind of occupations there are in the site visit company?

    • Do you know, what kind of education is required for each job?

    • Do you know, what the people who do the various jobs have to do at work?

    • Do you know, what kinds of skills/abilities/knowledge/attitudes/ways of thinking are required in each occupation?

  4. 11.

    What do you think about site visit as a way of working?

    • What do you think about the advance preparation of the site visit?

    • What do you think about the site visit?

    • What do you think about studying after the site visit?

    • What do you think about the site you visited?

    • How do you assess your own working?

    • What do you think you have learned during the site visit?

  5. 12.

    Tell us something about the mindmaps you constructed before and after the site visit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loukomies, A., Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., Meisalo, V., Lampiselkä, J. (2016). Design and Development of Teaching-Learning Sequence (TLS) Materials Around Us: Description of an Iterative Process. In: Psillos, D., Kariotoglou, P. (eds) Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7808-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7808-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7807-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7808-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics