Abstract
In this project, we designed, developed, implemented and refined a teaching-learning sequence (TLS) on density as materials’ property, applied into floating/sinking (F/S) phenomena. The main features of the TLS are the promotion of inquiry-based learning, enhanced by ICT tools and real experiments. A real-life scenario aimed to increase students’ interest and motivation, while in parallel, it was a link between science and technology. The main aims of the TLS were to improve fifth graders’ conceptual understanding of density and F/S, as well as procedural and epistemological understanding related to the control of variables strategy and the nature and role of models. In this paper, we are focusing both on the process of design and the refinement of the TLS. More specifically, we describe and justify the refinements from the first to the second implementation of the TLS, classifying them according both to Pickering’s model of scientific practice and to the origin of the data indicating the refinement. Most of the refinements refer to the procedural and the epistemological knowledge, while few concern the conceptual content of the TLS. In addition, the majority of refinements were guided by educational factors, and only a few, by scientific factors. The educational factor guides local-guided refinements, while the scientific factor guides holistic-open refinements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R. A., Hofstein, A., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok, R., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. doi:10.1002/sce.10118.
Benett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91, 347–370. doi:10.1002/sce.20186.
Besson, U., Borghi, L., De Ambrossis, A., & Mascheretti, P. (2010). A three-dimensional approach and open source structure for the design and experimentation of teaching-learning sequences: The case of friction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1289–1313. doi:10.1080/09500690903023350.
Boudreaux, A., Shaffer, P., Heron, P., & McDermott, L. (2008). Student understanding of control of variables: Deciding whether or not a variable influences the behavior of a system. American Journal of Physics, 76(2), 163–170. doi:10.1119/1.2805235.
Bybee, R. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Springer.
Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. doi:10.1002/tea.20157.
Duit, R. (1999). A model of educational reconstruction – A framework for research and development in science education. In P. Koumaras, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, & D. Psillos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Panhellenic conference on science education and new technologies (pp. 30–34). Thessaloniki: Christodoulides.
Duit, R. (2007). Science education research internationally: conceptions, research methods, domains of research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 3–15. Retrieved from http://www.ejmste.com/v3n1/abstv3n1artc1_duit.html
Duschl, R., & Grandy, R. (2008). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 1–37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
EU. (2007). Science education NOW: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Retrieved March 03, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf
Fazio, C., Guastella, I., Sperandeo-Mineo, R. M., & Tarantino, G. (2008). Modelling mechanical wave propagation: Guidelines and experimentation of a teaching-learning sequence. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11), 1491–1530. doi:10.1080/09500690802234017.
Fassoulopoulos, G., Kariotoglou, P., & Koumaras, P. (2003). Consistent and inconsistent pupil’s reasoning about intensive quantities: The case of density and pressure. Research in Science Education, 33, 71–87. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/klu/rise/.
Gilbert, S. W. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73–79. doi:10.1002/tea.3660280107.
Halloun, I. (2004). Modeling theory in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Moeller, K., & Stern, E. (2006). Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students’ understanding of ‘floating and sinking’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 307–326. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.307.
Havu, S. (2005). Examining young children’s conceptual change process in floating and sinking from a social constructivist perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 259–279. doi:10.1080/0950069042000243736.
Joung, Y. J. (2009). Children’s typically-perceived-situations of floating and sinking. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 101–127. doi:10.1080/09500690701744603.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Science teachers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273–1292. doi:10.1080/09500690210163198.
Kariotoglou, P. (2002). A laboratory – Based teaching learning sequence on fluids: Developing primary student teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge. In D. Psillos & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 79–90). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kariotoglou, P., Psillos, D., & Tselfes, V. (2003). Modelling the evolution of teaching – Learning sequences: From discovery to constructivism. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge-based society (pp. 259–268). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kattmann, U., & Duit, R. (1996, November). Educational reconstruction: Bringing together issues of scientific clarification and students’ conceptions. Paper presented at the First European Conference on Didactic of Biology (ERIDOB), Kiel, Germany.
Kawasaki, K., Herrenkohl, L., & Yeary, S. (2004). Theory building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit: a case study of third and fourth grade students’ developing epistemologies of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1299–1324. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000177226
Lijnse, P. L. (1995). ‘Developmental research’ as a way to an empirically-based ‘didactical structure’ of science. Science Education, 79(2), 189–199. doi:10.1002/sce.3730790205.
Lijnse, P., & Klaassen, K. (2004). Didactical structures as an outcome of research on teaching-learning sequences? International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 537–554. doi:10.1080/09500690310001614753.
Méheut, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Teaching-learning sequences: Aims and tools for science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 515–535. doi:10.1080/09500690310001614762.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Patsadakis, M. (2003). Educational practices of teachers and students in the teaching/learning of sciences. Ιn D. Krnel (Ed.), Proceedings, ESERA (European Science Education Research Association), Summer School 2002 (pp. 163–174). Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education. (In digital format – CD)
Perkins, D., & Grotzer, T. (2005). Dimensions of causal understanding: The role of complex causal models in students’ understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 41, 117–166. doi:10.1080/03057260508560216.
Petrosino, A. (2003). Commentary: A framework for supporting learning and teaching about mathematical and scientific models. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 3(3), 288–299. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol3/iss3/mathematics/article1.cfm.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
Psillos, D., Tselfes, V., & Kariotoglou, P. (2004). An epistemological analysis of the evolution of didactical activities in teaching-learning sequences: The case of fluids. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 555–578. doi:10.1080/09500690310001614744.
Psillos, D., Spyrtou, A., & Kariotoglou, P. (2005). Science teachers education: Issues and proposals. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. De Jong, & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 119–128). Dordrecht: Springer.
Smith, C., Snir, J., & Grosslight, L. (1992). Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight-density differentiation. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 221–283. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0903_3.
Spyrtou, A., Zoupidis, A., & Kariotoglou, P. (2008). The design and development of an ICT- Enhanced Module concerning density as a property of materials applied in floating-sinking phenomena. Ιn: C. P. Constantinou & N. Papadouris (Eds.), GIREP International Conference, Physics Curriculum Design, Development and Validation (pp. 391–407). Selected Papers, ISBN 978-9963-689-20-0.
Tiberghien, A., Vince, J., & Gaidoz, P. (2009). Design-based research: Case of a teaching sequence on mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2275–2314. doi:10.1080/09500690902874894.
Toth, E. E., Klahr, D., & Chen, Z. (2000). Bridging research and practice: A research-based classroom intervention for teaching experimentation skills to elementary school children. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 423–459. Retrieved from http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/HCGI.
Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. (2002). Student’s understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357–368. doi:10.1080/09500690110066485.
Vosniadou, S. (2010). Instructional considerations in the use of external representations. In L. Verschaffel, E. de Corte, T. de Jong, & J. Elen (Eds.), Use of representations in reasoning and problem solving (pp. 36–54). New York: Routledge.
Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2007). The impact of technology on the enactment of “inquiry” in a technology enthusiast’s sixth grade science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 154–182. doi:10.1002/tea.20158.
Wiser, M., & Smith, C. (2008). Learning and teaching about matter in grades K-8: When should the atomic-molecular theory be introduced? In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 205–239). New York: Routledge.
Acknowledgments
The data analysis process, according Pickering’s model, was strongly enhanced by the enlightening discussions with Prof. Vassilis Tselfes. We thank him warmly and sincerely. We also would like to thank warmly and sincerely the primary teachers, Blouchou Stefania and Triantafillidou Regina, who participated in the local research and realized the teaching interventions, because of their valuable contribution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zoupidis, A., Spyrtou, A., Malandrakis, G., Kariotoglou, P. (2016). The Evolutionary Refinement Process of a Teaching-Learning Sequence for Introducing Inquiry Aspects and Density as Materials’ Property in Floating/Sinking Phenomena. In: Psillos, D., Kariotoglou, P. (eds) Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7808-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7808-5_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7807-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7808-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)