Skip to main content

Purification Practices of Water Runoff from Construction of Norwegian Tunnels—Status and Research Gaps

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Urban Environment

Abstract

This article describes origin and effects of manmade and natural sources of water-borne pollutants related to Norwegian tunnelling projects. These include particles, acidic runoff, heavy metals, radioactivity, alkalinity, nitrogen, oil, chemicals and polypropylene fibres. Common water purification methods are described. In order to ensure quality of tunnelling water, research and development is needed. The article is concluded by identifying key research and development areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alabaster JS, Lloyd R (1982) Water quality criteria for freshwater fish. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker JP, Schofield CL (1982) Aluminium toxicity to fish in acidic waters. Water Air Soil Pollut 18:289–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes DK, Galgani F et al (2009) Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364(1526):1985–1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bilotta GS, Brazier RE (2008) Review. Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota (2008). Water Res 42:2849–2861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boholm Å, LR (1999) Issues of risk, trust and knowledge: the Hallandsås tunnel case. Ambio 25(6):556–561

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bækken T (2005) Emission of tunnel water to Korten stream. Effects on sediments and biology in Korten stram, Homanns stream and Ilene nature reserve. NIVA report in Norwegian. ISBN: 82-577-4642-8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bækken T (1998) Nitrogen runoff from tunnelling masses. NIVA report in Norwegian. ISBN: 82-577-3509-4

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bækken T (2000) Emission of tunnelling water to Maste stream Modum municipality. Effects on water chemistry, benthic organisms and fish. Final report. NIVA report in Norwegian. ISBN: 82-577-3917-0

    Google Scholar 

  9. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) (1999/2002) Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. Total particulate matter. http://ceqg-rcqe.ccme.ca/

  10. Craft ES, Abu-Qare AW et al (2004) Depleted and natural uranium; chemistry and toxicological effects. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 7:297–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Emmerson K, Lund RV et al (1975) Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effect of pH and temperature. J Fish Res Board Can 32:2379–2383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hals PI, Standal E et al (2011) Knowledge of marine litter in Norway. KLIF report TA 2753 (in Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hessen DO Biological effects of particles in water (1988) Limnos 3 (In Norwegian), ISSN 0333–3574, pp. 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hindar A (2010) Highway E18 Grimstad—Kristiansand; effects and quantification of acidic runoff from deposits of sulphide-bearing rock. NIVA report no. 5947-2010. ISBN: 978-82-577-5682-6

    Google Scholar 

  15. Knoph MB (1995) Toxicity of ammonia to Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Dissertation dr. scient, University of Bergen. ISBN: 82-7744-0170

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kruuse-Meyer R (2006) Tunnel run-off. Analyses of water and sludge samples during construction of tunnels with blasting operations. Master thesis NTNU

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meland S, Borgstrom et al (2010) Chemical and ecological effects of contaminated tunnel wash water runoff to a small Norwegian stream. Sci Total Environ 408(19):4107–4117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. NFF Norwegian Tunnelling Society (2009) Technical Report 09, Treatment and emission of tunnelling water, in Norwegian

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ng KL, Obbard JP (2006) Prevalence of microplastics in Singapore’s coastal marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull 52(7):761–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Norwegian RProtectionA (2012) Bulletin (Stråleverninfo) 7:2012, Alum shale—source of radioactive waste and pollution, in Norwegian, www.nrpa.no

  21. NPRA (2007) Håndbok 025 Prosesskode 1– Standard beskrivelsestekster for road contracts, process 33.4,

    Google Scholar 

  22. NPRA (2011) (VD) report No. 46, NORWAT—Nordic Road Water, Road and water pollution—A literature survey and identification of knowledge gaps

    Google Scholar 

  23. Song Y, Salbu B et al (2012) Early stress responses in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of uranium. Aquatic Toxicol 112–113:62–71

    Google Scholar 

  24. Teien H-C (2005) Transformation of aluminium species in unstable aquatic mixing zones—mobility and bioavailability towards fish. Dissertation dr. philos, UMB. ISBN: 82-575-0665-6

    Google Scholar 

  25. Teuten EL, Saquing JM et al (2009) Transport and release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364(1526):2027–2045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thompson RC, Moore CJ et al (2009) Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364(1526):2153–2166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tryland Ø (1977) Removal of nitrogenic compounds from waste water. Literature survey. Results from investigations at NIVA (in Norwegian). NIVA report FR–311

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vik EA, Sverdrup L et al (2000) Experiences from environmental risk management of chemical grouting agents used during construction of the Romeriksporten tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Tech Constr Mater 15(4):369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hedda Vikan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vikan, H., Meland, S. (2013). Purification Practices of Water Runoff from Construction of Norwegian Tunnels—Status and Research Gaps. In: Rauch, S., Morrison, G., Norra, S., Schleicher, N. (eds) Urban Environment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7756-9_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7756-9_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7755-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7756-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics