Skip to main content

Neoliberalism and Spatial Adaptation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Urban Environment

Abstract

Human spatial environments must adapt to climate change. Spatial planning is central to climate change adaptation and potentially well suited to the task, however neoliberal influences and trends threaten this capacity. This paper explores the significance of neoliberal influences on urban planning to climate change adaptation. The potential form of spatial adaptation within the context of a planning environment influenced by neoliberal principles is evaluated. This influence relates to spatial scale, temporal scale, responsibility for action, strategies and mechanisms, accrual of benefits, negotiation of priorities and approach to uncertainty.

This paper presents a conceptual framework of the influence of neoliberalism on spatial adaptation. It identifies the potential characteristics, challenges and opportunities of spatial adaptation under a neoliberal frame.

The neoliberal frame does not entirely preclude spatial adaptation but significantly influence its form. Neoliberal approaches involve individual action in response to private incentives and near term impacts while collective action, regulatory mechanisms and long term planning is approached cautiously. Challenges concern the degree to which collective action and a long term orientation are necessary, how individual adaptation relates to collective vulnerability and the prioritisation of adaptation by markets. Opportunities might involve the operability of individual and local adaptation, the existence of private incentives to adapt and the potential to align adaptation with entrepreneurial projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adger N (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79(4):387–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allmendinger P (2002) Planning theory. Palgrave, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Australian Government Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (CCEE) (2010) Adapting to climate change in Australia. Retrieved from: http://www.climatechange.gov.au

  4. Australian Government Productivity Commission (AGPC) (2012) Barriers to effective climate change adaptation—Draft Report. Retrieved from: http://www.pc.gov.au

  5. Bailey I, Wilson G (2009) Theorising transitional pathways in response to climate change: technocentrism, ecocentrism, and the carbon economy. Environ Plann A 41(10):2324–2341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bardsley D, Pech P (2012) Defining spaces of resilience within the neoliberal paradigm: could French land use classifications guide support for risk management within an Australian regional context? Human Ecol: Interdiscipl J 40(1):129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner N, Theodore N (2002) Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode 34(3):349–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brenner N, Theodore N (2005) Neoliberalism and the urban condition. City 9(1):101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brenner N, Peck J, Theodore N (2010) Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks 10(2):182–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown K (2011) Sustainable adaptation: an oxymoron? Clim Dev 3(1):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Castree N (2008) Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environ Plann A 40(1):131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crane R, Landis J (2010) Introduction to the special issue. J Am Plann Assoc 76(4):389–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Davoudi S, Crawford J, Mehmood A (eds) (2009) Planning for climate change: strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Felli R, Castree N (2012) Neoliberalising adaptation to environmental change: foresight or foreclosure? Environ Plann A 44(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fieldman G (2011) Neoliberalism, the production of vulnerability and the hobbled state: systemic barriers to climate adaptation. Clim Dev 3(2):159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Geddes M (2008) Neoliberalism and local governance – cross-national perspectives and speculations. In: Davies, JS (ed) Journal of European Public Policy Series . London, UK: Routledge, pp. 123–142. ISBN 9780415420884.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gleeson B, Low N (2000) Revaluing planning: rolling back neo-liberalism in Australia. Progr Plann 53(2):83–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Granberg M, Glover L (2011) Adapting Australian cities to climate change: is there a growing risk of maladaptation? Paper presented at the State of Australian Cities Conference, University of Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  19. Greiving S, Fleischhauer M (2012) National climate change adaptation strategies of European states from a spatial planning and development perspective. Eur Plann Stud 20(1):27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grist N (2008) Positioning climate change in sustainable development discourse. J Int Dev 20(6):783–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harvey D (2005) A brief history of neoliberalisim. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hawken P, Lovins A, Lovins l (1999) Natural capitalism: creating the next industrial revolution. Little Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heynen N, McCarthy J, Prudham S, Robbins P (2007) Neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hurlimann A, March A (2012) The role of spatial planning in adapting to climate change. Wiley Interdiscipl Rev: Clim Change 3(5):477–488

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kovel J (2007) The enemy of nature: the end of capitalism or the end of the world? Zed Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Leichenko R, O’Brien K (2008) Environmental change and globalization: double exposures. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Leitner H, Peck J, Sheppard E (2006) Contesting neoliberalism: urban frontiers. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Matthews T (2012) Responding to climate change as a transformative stressor through metropolitan regional planning. Local Environment

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer B, Rannow S, Loibl W (2010) Climate change and spatial planning. Landsc Urban Plann 98(3–4):139–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Oppermann E (2011) The discourse of adaptation to climate change and the UK climate impacts programme: de-scribing the problematization of adaptation. Clim Dev 3(1):71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Peck J, Tickell A (2002) Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34(3):380–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Peck J, Theodore N, Brenner N (2009) Neoliberal urbanism: models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review 29(1):49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Porritt J (2007) Capitalisim as if the world matters. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roggema RE (2007) Spatial impact of adaptation to climate change in Groningen, move with time. Province of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roggema R (2009) Adaptation to climate change: a spatial challenge. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Roggema R, Kabat P, van den Dobbelsteen A (2012) Towards a spatial planning framework for climate adaptation. Smart Sustain Built Environ 1(1):29–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sager T (2011) Neo-liberal urban planning policies: a literature survey 1990–2010. Progr Plann 76(4):147–199

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Schipper L (2006) Conceptual history of adaptation in the UNFCCC process. Rev Eur Community Int Environ Law 15(1):82–92

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Schweickart D (2010) Is sustainable capitalism possible? Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 2(5):6739–6752

    Google Scholar 

  40. Solecki W, Leichenko R, O’Brien K (2011) Climate change adaptation strategies and disaster risk reduction in cities: connections, contentions, and synergies. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3(3):135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wilson E (2006) Adapting to climate change at the local level: the spatial planning response. Local Environ 11(6):609–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lachlan McClure .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

McClure, L., Baker, D., Sloan, M. (2013). Neoliberalism and Spatial Adaptation. In: Rauch, S., Morrison, G., Norra, S., Schleicher, N. (eds) Urban Environment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7756-9_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7756-9_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7755-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7756-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics