Abstract
Human spatial environments must adapt to climate change. Spatial planning is central to climate change adaptation and potentially well suited to the task, however neoliberal influences and trends threaten this capacity. This paper explores the significance of neoliberal influences on urban planning to climate change adaptation. The potential form of spatial adaptation within the context of a planning environment influenced by neoliberal principles is evaluated. This influence relates to spatial scale, temporal scale, responsibility for action, strategies and mechanisms, accrual of benefits, negotiation of priorities and approach to uncertainty.
This paper presents a conceptual framework of the influence of neoliberalism on spatial adaptation. It identifies the potential characteristics, challenges and opportunities of spatial adaptation under a neoliberal frame.
The neoliberal frame does not entirely preclude spatial adaptation but significantly influence its form. Neoliberal approaches involve individual action in response to private incentives and near term impacts while collective action, regulatory mechanisms and long term planning is approached cautiously. Challenges concern the degree to which collective action and a long term orientation are necessary, how individual adaptation relates to collective vulnerability and the prioritisation of adaptation by markets. Opportunities might involve the operability of individual and local adaptation, the existence of private incentives to adapt and the potential to align adaptation with entrepreneurial projects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adger N (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79(4):387–404
Allmendinger P (2002) Planning theory. Palgrave, New York
Australian Government Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (CCEE) (2010) Adapting to climate change in Australia. Retrieved from: http://www.climatechange.gov.au
Australian Government Productivity Commission (AGPC) (2012) Barriers to effective climate change adaptation—Draft Report. Retrieved from: http://www.pc.gov.au
Bailey I, Wilson G (2009) Theorising transitional pathways in response to climate change: technocentrism, ecocentrism, and the carbon economy. Environ Plann A 41(10):2324–2341
Bardsley D, Pech P (2012) Defining spaces of resilience within the neoliberal paradigm: could French land use classifications guide support for risk management within an Australian regional context? Human Ecol: Interdiscipl J 40(1):129–143
Brenner N, Theodore N (2002) Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode 34(3):349–379
Brenner N, Theodore N (2005) Neoliberalism and the urban condition. City 9(1):101–107
Brenner N, Peck J, Theodore N (2010) Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks 10(2):182–222
Brown K (2011) Sustainable adaptation: an oxymoron? Clim Dev 3(1):21–31
Castree N (2008) Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environ Plann A 40(1):131–152
Crane R, Landis J (2010) Introduction to the special issue. J Am Plann Assoc 76(4):389–401
Davoudi S, Crawford J, Mehmood A (eds) (2009) Planning for climate change: strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. Earthscan, London
Felli R, Castree N (2012) Neoliberalising adaptation to environmental change: foresight or foreclosure? Environ Plann A 44(1):1–4
Fieldman G (2011) Neoliberalism, the production of vulnerability and the hobbled state: systemic barriers to climate adaptation. Clim Dev 3(2):159–174
Geddes M (2008) Neoliberalism and local governance – cross-national perspectives and speculations. In: Davies, JS (ed) Journal of European Public Policy Series . London, UK: Routledge, pp. 123–142. ISBN 9780415420884.
Gleeson B, Low N (2000) Revaluing planning: rolling back neo-liberalism in Australia. Progr Plann 53(2):83–164
Granberg M, Glover L (2011) Adapting Australian cities to climate change: is there a growing risk of maladaptation? Paper presented at the State of Australian Cities Conference, University of Melbourne
Greiving S, Fleischhauer M (2012) National climate change adaptation strategies of European states from a spatial planning and development perspective. Eur Plann Stud 20(1):27–48
Grist N (2008) Positioning climate change in sustainable development discourse. J Int Dev 20(6):783–803
Harvey D (2005) A brief history of neoliberalisim. Oxford University Press, New York
Hawken P, Lovins A, Lovins l (1999) Natural capitalism: creating the next industrial revolution. Little Brown, Boston
Heynen N, McCarthy J, Prudham S, Robbins P (2007) Neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences. Routledge, New York
Hurlimann A, March A (2012) The role of spatial planning in adapting to climate change. Wiley Interdiscipl Rev: Clim Change 3(5):477–488
Kovel J (2007) The enemy of nature: the end of capitalism or the end of the world? Zed Books, New York
Leichenko R, O’Brien K (2008) Environmental change and globalization: double exposures. Oxford University Press, New York
Leitner H, Peck J, Sheppard E (2006) Contesting neoliberalism: urban frontiers. Guilford Press, New York
Matthews T (2012) Responding to climate change as a transformative stressor through metropolitan regional planning. Local Environment
Meyer B, Rannow S, Loibl W (2010) Climate change and spatial planning. Landsc Urban Plann 98(3–4):139–140
Oppermann E (2011) The discourse of adaptation to climate change and the UK climate impacts programme: de-scribing the problematization of adaptation. Clim Dev 3(1):71–85
Peck J, Tickell A (2002) Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34(3):380–404
Peck J, Theodore N, Brenner N (2009) Neoliberal urbanism: models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review 29(1):49–66
Porritt J (2007) Capitalisim as if the world matters. Earthscan, London
Roggema RE (2007) Spatial impact of adaptation to climate change in Groningen, move with time. Province of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Roggema R (2009) Adaptation to climate change: a spatial challenge. Springer, Dordrecht
Roggema R, Kabat P, van den Dobbelsteen A (2012) Towards a spatial planning framework for climate adaptation. Smart Sustain Built Environ 1(1):29–58
Sager T (2011) Neo-liberal urban planning policies: a literature survey 1990–2010. Progr Plann 76(4):147–199
Schipper L (2006) Conceptual history of adaptation in the UNFCCC process. Rev Eur Community Int Environ Law 15(1):82–92
Schweickart D (2010) Is sustainable capitalism possible? Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 2(5):6739–6752
Solecki W, Leichenko R, O’Brien K (2011) Climate change adaptation strategies and disaster risk reduction in cities: connections, contentions, and synergies. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3(3):135–141
Wilson E (2006) Adapting to climate change at the local level: the spatial planning response. Local Environ 11(6):609–625
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
McClure, L., Baker, D., Sloan, M. (2013). Neoliberalism and Spatial Adaptation. In: Rauch, S., Morrison, G., Norra, S., Schleicher, N. (eds) Urban Environment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7756-9_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7756-9_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7755-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7756-9
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)