Advertisement

To Make the Root Stronger: Language Policies and Experiences of Successful Multilingual Intermarried Families with Adolescent Children in Tallinn

  • Colm DoyleEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Multilingual Education book series (MULT, volume 7)

Abstract

The present chapter reports results of a study on the language policies and experiences of 11 intermarried families in Tallinn. As the capital of Estonia, the city contains much of the linguistic and ethnic diversity of the state. Forty-five percent (45 %) of the country’s 392,000-strong non-ethnic-Estonian population resides in the city (Statistics Estonia, Statistical database: population and Housing Census 2011: PC0428: population by ethnic nationality, sex and place of residence, 31 December 2011. http://pub.stat.ee/px-web.2001/I_Databas/Population_Census/databasetree.asp. Accessed: 24 June 2013, 2013a), half the city’s population speaks a non-Estonian language as a mother tongue and 23 % of residents are of a different citizenship than Estonian (Tallinn City Government, Statistical Yearbook of Tallinn 2012. http://www.tallinn.ee/eng/g2677s63835. Accessed 24 June 2013, 2012). Ten of the participant families had been successful in raising at least one child to adolescence with active and productive competence in at least two languages including the state language, Estonian. Another participant family was on its way to achieving this goal. Through semi-structured interviews the family members discussed the formation and application of language policy; shared their experiences; and looked to the future when the adolescent children become adults and consider starting families of their own. It is suggested that the successful outcomes were not wholly due to the families’ language policies, but that the particular sociolinguistic context of Tallinn, as well as the status of the languages involved, also had a large role to play.

Keywords

Present Author Language Policy Mother Tongue Minority Language Adolescent Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I acknowledge the valuable feedback to this chapter of Mila Schwartz, my doctoral supervisor Anna Verschik and my family, and also the assistance of the schools and the participation of the 11 families, without whom this study would not have been possible.

References

  1. Caldas, S. 2006. Raising bilingual-biliterate children in monolingual cultures. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  2. Caldas, S. 2008. Changing bilingual self-perceptions from early adolescence to early adulthood: Empirical evidence from a mixed-methods case study. Applied Linguistics 29(2): 290–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clulow, C. 1993. “Good-enough” marriage. In Rethinking marriage: Public and private perspectives, ed. C. Clulow, 123–134. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  4. Curdt-Christiansen, X.L. 2009. Invisible and visible language planning: Ideological factors in the family language policy of Chinese immigrant families in Quebec. Language Policy 8(4): 351–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Houwer, A. 2009. Bilingual first language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  6. DeCapua, A., and A.C. Wintergerst. 2009. Second-generation language maintenance and identity: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal 32(1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deuchar, M., and S. Quay. 2000. Bilingual acquisition: Theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Döpke, S. 1992. One parent one language: An interactional approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. 2012a. Special Eurobarometer 386 Europeans and their languages. National Factsheets: Eesti. http://ec.europa.eu/languages/documents/eurobarometer/e386-factsheets-ee_en.pdf . Accessed 24 June 2013.
  10. European Commission. 2012b. First European survey on language competences. http://ec.europa.eu/languages/eslc/docs/en/executive-summary-eslc_en.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2013.
  11. Fries, S. 1998. Different phases: A personal case study in language adjustment and children’s bilingualism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 133(1): 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. King, K., and L. Fogle. 2006. Bilingual parenting as good parenting: Parents’ perspectives on family language policy for additive bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9(6): 695–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. King, K., and A. Logan-Terry. 2008. Additive bilingualism through family language policy: Ideologies, strategies and interactional outcomes. Calidoscópio 6(1): 5–19.Google Scholar
  14. King, K., L. Fogle, and A. Logan-Terry. 2008. Family language policy. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5): 907–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kopeliovich, S. 2010. Family language policy: A case study of a Russian-Hebrew bilingual family: Toward a theoretical framework. Diaspora, Indigenous and Minority Education 4(3): 162–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kouritzin, S.G. 2000. A mother’s tongue. TESOL Quarterly 34(2): 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Küpelikilinç, N. 1998. Multilingualism and identity. The Bilingual Family Newsletter 15(2): 1–2 & 8.Google Scholar
  18. Luykx, A. 2005. Children as socializing agents: Family language policy in situations of language shift. In ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on bilingualism, ed. J. Cohen, K.T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, and J. MacSwan, 1407–1414. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  19. Okita, T. 2002. Invisible work: Bilingualism, language choice and childrearing in intermarried families. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  20. Pavlenko, A. 2004. ‘Stop doing that, Ia Komu Skazala!’: Language choice and emotions in parent-child communication. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 25(2–3): 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Piller, I. 2001. Private language planning: The best of both worlds? Estudios de Sociolingüística 2(1): 61–80.Google Scholar
  22. Piller, I. 2005. Review of the book Language strategies for bilingual families: The one-parent-one-language approach, by S. Barron-Hauwaert. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 8(6): 614–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piller, I., and A. Pavlenko. 2004. Bilingualism and gender. In The handbook of bilingualism, ed. T.K. Bhatia and W.C. Ritchie, 489–511. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Schiffman, H.F. 1996. Linguistic culture and language policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Schwartz, M. 2010. Family language policy: Core issues of an emerging field. Applied Linguistics Review 1: 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwartz, M., and V. Moin. 2012. Parents’ assessment of their preschool children’s bilingual development in the context of family language policy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 33(1): 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soler, J. 2013. The anonymity of Catalan and the authenticity of Estonian: Two paths for the development of medium-sized languages. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16(2): 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spolsky, B. 2004. Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Statistics Estonia. 2012a. News release: PHC 2011: People of 192 ethnic nationalities live in Estonia. http://www.stat.ee/dokumendid/64846. Accessed 24 June 2013.
  30. Statistics Estonia. 2012b. News release: PHC 2011: 157 native languages spoken in Estonia. http://www.stat.ee/dokumendid/64633. Accessed 24 June 2013.
  31. Statistics Estonia. 2013a. Statistical database: Population and Housing Census 2011: PC0428: Population by ethnic nationality, sex and place of residence, 31 December 2011. http://pub.stat.ee/px-web.2001/I_Databas/Population_Census/databasetree.asp. Accessed 24 June 2013.
  32. Statistics Estonia. 2013b. Statistical database: Population and Housing Census 2011: PC0431: Population by mother tongue and sex, 31 December 2011. http://pub.stat.ee/px-web.2001/I_Databas/Population_Census/databasetree.asp. Accessed 24 June 2013.
  33. Tallinn City Government. 2012. Statistical Yearbook of Tallinn 2012. http://www.tallinn.ee/eng/g2677s63835. Accessed 24 June 2013.
  34. Tannenbaum, M. 2012. Family language policy as a form of coping or defence mechanism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 33(1): 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tuominen, A.K. 1999. Who decides the home language? A look at multilingual families. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 140(1): 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yamamoto, M. 2001. Language use in interlingual families: A Japanese-English sociolinguistic study. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  37. Yamamoto, M. 2002. Language use in families with parents of different native languages: An investigation of Japanese-non-English and Japanese-English families. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 23(6): 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Estonian Language and CultureTallinn UniversityTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations