Advertisement

Unity in Discourse, Diversity in Practice: The One Person One Language Policy in Bilingual Families

  • Åsa PalviainenEmail author
  • Sally Boyd
Chapter
Part of the Multilingual Education book series (MULT, volume 7)

Abstract

When parents with different first languages have a child, and want the child to become bilingual in both languages, many parents adopt the one person – one language (OPOL) strategy. This chapter uses nexus analysis (Scollon R, Scollon SW, Nexus analysis. Discourse and the emerging internet. Routledge, London, 2004) to carry out a discourse analysis of ways in which this strategy is motivated by parents and ways it is enacted in conversations between parents and children, in three Swedish-Finnish bilingual families with 3–4 year old children in Finland. We also look at how the children participate in the negotiation of family language policy. Parents were interviewed about their own language backgrounds and education and their explicit strategies of communication in the family. They were also asked to record family interactions. Interviews and interaction were transcribed for further analysis. The results of the nexus analysis show similar parental discourses indicating that the family language policy was a result of both explicit planning and non-planned practices. They described the OPOL strategy as a “natural” one to use to raise their children bilingually, although all of them were themselves raised in only one language; they were concerned by the dominance of the majority language (Finnish) in the surroundings and found it important to increase the amount of the minority language (Swedish) used around the child; and they all referred to personal experiences, lay theories as well as research to motivate their policies. The discussions of FLP showed that this policy was in constant flux and subject to minor re-negotiations. The analysis of the interaction showed that details of the FLP were furthermore mutually constructed and negotiated upon; the children had an important role in this process. The study shows that the one person – one language strategy can imply different practices, in different families and different contexts.

Keywords

Language Policy Interaction Order Minority Language Childhood Bilingualism Language Planning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arnberg, L. 1988. Så blir barn tvåspråkiga. Vägledning och råd under förskoleåldern [How children become bilingual. Guidance and advice during the pre-school years]. Stockholm: Wahlström and Widstrand.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, C. 2000. A parents’ and teachers’ guide to bilingualism, 2nd ed. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  3. Barron-Hauwaert, S. 2004. Language strategies for bilingual families. The one-parent-one-language approach, Parents’ and teachers’ guides 7. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, S., and Å. Palviainen. Under review. Building walls or bridges? Language ideological debate about bilingual schools in Finland. In Multisited language policy discourse: Finland and Sweden in interdisciplinary comparison, eds. M. Halonen, P. Ihalainen, and T. Saarinen.Google Scholar
  5. Cross, R. 2009. A sociocultural framework for language policy and planning. Language Problems & Language Planning 33(1): 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunningham-Andersson, U., and S. Andersson. 2004. Growing up with two languages – A practical guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. De Houwer, A. 2007. Parental language input patterns and children’s bilingual use. Applied Psycholinguistics 28(3): 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Houwer, A. 2009. Bilingual first language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  9. Döpke, S. 1992. One parent–one language: An interactional approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  10. Doyle, C. 2013. “To make the root stronger”: Language policies of successful multilingual inter-marriage families in Tallinn. In Successful family language policy: Parents, children and educators in interaction, Multilingual education, ed. M. Schwartz and A. Verschik. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Gafaranga, J. 2010. Medium request: Talking language shift into being. Language in Society 39: 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giles, H., R.Y. Bourhis, and D.M. Taylor. 1977. Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations, ed. H. Giles. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Goffman, E. 1983. The interaction ritual. American Sociological Review 48: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grosjean, F. 1982. Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Grosjean, F. 2010. Bilingual: Life and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Harding-Esch, E., and P. Riley. 2003. The bilingual family: A handbook for parents, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heller, M. 1999. Linguistic minorities and modernity: A sociolinguistic ethnography. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  18. Hult, F.M. 2010. Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 202: 7–24.Google Scholar
  19. Hult, F., and S. Pietikäinen. 2014. Shaping discourses of multilingualism through a language ideological debate: The case of Swedish in Finland. Journal of Language and Politics 13(1). John Benjamins Publication.Google Scholar
  20. Juan-Garau, M., and C. Pérez-Vidal. 2001. Mixing and pragmatic parental strategies in early bilingual acquisition. Journal of Child Language 28: 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King, K., and L. Fogle. 2006. Bilingual parenting as good parenting: Parents’ perspectives on family language policy for additive bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9(6): 695–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King, K., L. Fogle, and A. Logan-Terry. 2008. Family language policy. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5): 907–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kopeliovich, S. 2013. Happylingual: A family project for enhancing and balancing multilingual development. In Successful family language policy: Parents, children and educators in interaction, Multilingual education, ed. M. Schwartz and A. Verschik. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Lanza, E. 1997. Language mixing in infant bilingualism: A sociolinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lanza, E., and B.A. Svendsen. 2007. Tell me who your friends are and I might be able to tell you what language(s) you speak: Social network analysis, multilingualism, and identity. International Journal of Bilingualism 11(3): 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lehtonen, J., and T. Valli. 2012. Språkstrategier och familjespråkpolicy hos tre tvåspråkiga familjer i ett finskspråkigt område [Language strategies and family language policy among three bilingual families in a Finnish-speaking area]. Master’s thesis, Department of Languages, University of Jyväskylä, Finland. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201206211920
  27. Leopold, W. 1970. Speech development of a bilingual child: A linguist’s record. New York: AMSP.Google Scholar
  28. Luykx, A. 2005. Children as socializing agents: Family language policy in situations of language shift. In ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on bilingualism, ed. J. Cohen, K.T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, and J. MacSwan, 1407–1414. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  29. McRae, K.D. 2007. Toward language equality: Four democracies compared. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 187(188): 13–34.Google Scholar
  30. Mishina-Mori, S. 2011. A longitudinal analysis of language choice in bilingual children: The role of parental input and interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3122–3138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moin, V., M. Schwartz, and M. Leikin. 2013. Immigrant parents’ lay theories of children’s preschool bilingual development and family language ideologies. International Multilingual Research Journal 7(2): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Okita, T. 2002. Invisible work: Bilingualism, language choice and childrearing in inter-married families. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  33. Palviainen, Å. 2013. National identity and a transnational space: The strength of tradition in a time of change. Sociolinguistica 27: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pietikäinen, S. 2010. Sámi language mobility: Scales and discourses of multilingualism in a polycentric environment. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 202: 79–102.Google Scholar
  35. Piller, I. 2001. Private language planning: The best of both worlds? Estudios de Sociolingüística 2(1): 61–80.Google Scholar
  36. Romaine, S. 1995. Bilingualism, 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Ronjat, J. 1913. Le développement du langage observé chez un enfant bilingue [Language development observed in a bilingual child]. Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
  38. Rontu, H. 2005. Språkdominans i tidig tvåspråkighet. Barnets kodväxling i kontext [Language dominance in early bilingualism: The child’s code-switching in context]. Åbo: Åbo akademi university press.Google Scholar
  39. Saunders, G. 1988. Bilingual children: From birth to teens. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
  40. Schiffman, H. 1996. Linguistic culture and language policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Schwartz, M. 2010. Family language policy: Core issues of an emerging field. Applied Linguistics Review 1(1): 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwartz, M. 2013. Immigrant parents’ and teachers’ views on bilingual preschool language policy. Language and Education 27(1): 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwartz, M., V. Moin, M. Leikin, and A. Breitkopf. 2010. Immigrant parents’ choice of a bilingual versus monolingual kindergarten for second-generation children: Motives, attitudes, and factors. International Multilingual Research Journal 4(2): 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwartz, M., V. Moin, and M. Leikin. 2011. Parents’ discourses about language strategies for their children’s preschool bilingual development. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education 5: 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scollon, R., and S.W. Scollon. 2004. Nexus analysis. Discourse and the emerging internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Shohamy, E. 2006. Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Snow, C., and C. Ferguson. 1977. Talking to children: Language input and acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Spolsky, B., and E. Shohamy. 1999. The languages of Israel: Policy, ideology and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  49. Statistics Finland. 2012. Väestörakenne [Demographics]. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/tup/suoluk/suoluk_vaesto.html#vaestorakenne
  50. Tandefelt, M., and F. Finnäs. 2007. Language and demography: Historical development. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 187(188): 35–54.Google Scholar
  51. Tuominen, A. 1999. Who decides the home language? A look at multilingual families. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 140: 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yamamoto, M. 2001. Language use in interlingual families: A Japanese-English sociolinguistic study. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LanguagesUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of ScienceUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations