Skip to main content

Instinct and Abduction in the Peircean Informational Perspective: Contributions to Biosemiotics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Peirce and Biosemiotics

Part of the book series: Biosemiotics ((BSEM,volume 11))

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to analyze the Peircean notion of instinct and its relationship with abductive reasoning in the context of the reflection elaborated by Peirce concerning the nature of information. To this end, the work will be divided into three parts. In the first, we shall present the Peircean concept of abductive reasoning, emphasizing those passages where Peirce mentions instinct as an anchor for this type of reasoning. Special attention will be given to passages of the treatise An Essay Toward Improving Our Reasoning in Security and in Uberty (1913), in which Peirce in maturity discusses the nature of instinct. In the second part, the Peircean concept of information and its relation with sign is presented, focusing on Peirce’s characterization of sign as a vehicle for the communication of form. Finally, in the third part we propose a reading of the Peircean concept of instinct based on his reflection on the concepts of abduction and information. Our working hypothesis is that the Peircean concept of information could help to clarify not only the notion of instinct, but also the role of instinct in abductive reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    EP2:463–474.

  2. 2.

    Cf.EP2:217–218.

  3. 3.

    Gonzalez et al. 2007.

  4. 4.

    MS 660. NEM III.1:214.

  5. 5.

    MS 660. NEM III.1: 214.

  6. 6.

    L231. NEM III.1: 203–204.

  7. 7.

    MS 682. EP2:463–474.

  8. 8.

    Peirce Edition Project (1998).

  9. 9.

    EP 2:133–241.

  10. 10.

    Peirce was probably one of the first among Western philosophers to develop a very detailed analysis of the ontological, epistemological, and logical nature of information. For the purposes of the present investigation, only two of his perspectives on information are presented.

  11. 11.

    Cf. W1: 275–279.

  12. 12.

    MS 107. W1: 286–287.

  13. 13.

    CP 2.418–426.

  14. 14.

    Cf. CP 2. 418–419.

  15. 15.

    CP 2.309–315.

  16. 16.

    CP 2.312.

  17. 17.

    CP 2.314.

  18. 18.

    MS 793:2. EP2:544 n.22.

  19. 19.

    EP2:477.

  20. 20.

    See pages 91–92 of this volume for a full quotation on Peirce's view of the being of a form as the truth of a conditional proposition.

  21. 21.

    Idem, ibidem.

  22. 22.

    CP 4.530–571.

  23. 23.

    CP 4.550–551.

  24. 24.

    CP 2.227.

  25. 25.

    CP 5.173.

  26. 26.

    From the complex system perspective, as pointed out by Merrell, in the study of life no level of information is necessarily more fundamental than any other, given that all levels are dependent on others in this rich, multilayer, interacting system.

  27. 27.

    The attribution of an Umwelt and an Innenwelt to all the animals is present in work of Jacob Uexkull, 1936 as can be by the homonymous title of one of his first writings.

References

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1987). Men are like plants. In W. I. Thompson (Ed.), Gaia—a way of knowing: Political implications of the new biology. New York: Lindisfarne Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, M. E. Q., Broens, M. C., & D’Ottaviano, F. L. (2007). Abductive reasoning, information and mechanical systems. In Studies in computational intelligence (SCI) (Vol. 64, pp. 91–101). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hexküll, J. von, & Kiszat, G. (1936). Streifzüge duch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Berlin: Springer. (Neudruck Fischer. Frankfurt 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, F. (1987). Signs grow: Semiosis and life processes. University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce Edition Project. (Ed.). (1998). The essential Peirce. Selected philosophical writings Volume 2, 1893–1913. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. (1985). Anticipatory systems: Philosophical, mathematical & methodological foundations. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Vinicius Romanini, Mariana Claudia Broens, and José Artur Quilici Gonzalez for their valuable comments on previous versions of this chapter. The work was sponsored by UNESP, CNPq, and Fapesp. Finally, we thank our colleagues from GAEC and CLE for their inspirational research activities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauro Frederico Barbosa da Silveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barbosa da Silveira, L., Gonzalez, M. (2014). Instinct and Abduction in the Peircean Informational Perspective: Contributions to Biosemiotics. In: Romanini, V., Fernández, E. (eds) Peirce and Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7732-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics