Skip to main content

On-Farm Agroforestry Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tropical Agroforestry

Abstract

Agroforestry research aims to develop new practices or technologies and facilitate their adoption by farmers. Research on farms is done to address adoption issues, by allowing farmers to evaluate or adapt the technology being researched or tested in local conditions. On-farm research, which involves the participation of farmers in the technology generation process, is often used, depending on the objectives of the research, the nature of the questions being investigated, and local conditions, when conducting participatory farming systems, “farmer first”, or “augmented designs” research. Participatory farming systems research is the generation of technologies by involving technology users in the planning and evaluation process. Farmer first research is when farmers conduct the experimentation and analysis on agricultural innovation themselves, with facilitation and support from scientists. Lastly, augmented designs research involves experimental designs that take into account the participation of farmers, thereby allowing the estimation of farmer-augmented defined treatments. Wider dissemination of agroforestry technologies has been largely done through scaling-up approaches, some of which have facilitated the widespread adoption of fodder shrubs among smallholders in the highlands of Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, and Tanzania. Techniques that have been successfully used include: (i) the collaboration of researchers with large Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) that promote fodder shrubs; (ii) large scale dissemination of facilitators who train trainers and provide support to extension workers; (iii) farmer-to-farmer dissemination; (iv) private seed vendors; and (v) civil society campaigns bringing together different stakeholders to train farmers by farmers. In the humid tropics of West and Central Africa, grassroots organizations were also effective in disseminating agroforestry innovations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Attah-Krah AN, Francis PA (1987) The role of on-farm trials in the evaluation of composite technologies: The case of alley farming in southern Nigeria. Agric Syst 23:133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berr J (1991) Implementing on-farm agroforestry research: Lessons learned in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Agrofor Syst 15:229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee DL, Harrington L, Winkelman DL (1982) Farming system research: Issue in research and technology design. Am J Agric Econ 64:897–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1989) Farmers-first: A practical paradigm for the third-world agriculture. In: Altieri M, Hecht S (eds) Agroecology and Small Farm Development. CRC Press, Boca Rato. Pp. 237–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1994a) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Dev 22(7):953–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1994b) Participatory Research Appraisal (PRA): analysis of experience. World Dev 22(9):1253–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1994c) Participatory Research Appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigms. World Dev 22(10):1437–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B (2012) Farming systems research into the 12st century: the new paradigm. Springer. p. 490

    Google Scholar 

  • Degrande A, Franzel S, Siohdjie Yeptiep Y, Asaah E, Tsobeng A, Tchoundjeu Z (2012) Effectiveness of grassroot organisations in the dissemination of agroforestry innovations. In: Kaonga M (ed) Agroforestry for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services—Science and Practice. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia. Pp. 142–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzel SC, Scherr SJ (2002) Trees on the farm: assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry in Africa. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. p. 207

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S, Wambugu C (2007) The uptake of fodder shrubs among stakeholders in East Africa: Key elements that facilitate widespread adoption. In: Hare MD, Wongpichet K (eds) Forages: A pathway to prosperity for smallholder farmers. Proceedings of an International Symposium, Faculty of Agriculture, Ubon Ratcha thani University, Thailand. Pp. 203–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S, Arimi HK, Murithi FM (2002a) Calliandra calothyrsus: Assessing the early stages of adoption of a fodder shrub in the highlands of Central kenya. In: Franzel SC (ed) Trees on the farm: Assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry in Africa. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp. 125–143

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S, Phiri D, Kwesiga F (2002b) Assessing the adoption potential of improved fallows in Eastern Zambia. In: Franzel SC, Scherr SJ (eds) Trees on the farm: Assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry in Africa. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. Pp. 37–61

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franzel SC, Scherr SJ, Coe R, Cooper PJM, Place F (2002c) Methods for assessing agroforestry adoption potential. In: Franzel SC, Scherr SJ (eds) Trees on the farm: Assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry in Africa. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. Pp. 11–35

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand PE (1990) Modified stability analysis and on-farm research to breed specific adaptability for ecological diversity. In: Kang MS (ed) Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge. Pp. 169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand PE, Russell JT (1996) Adaptability analysis. A method for the design, analysis and interpretation of on-farm research-extension. Iowa State University Press, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand PE, Singh BK, Bellows BC, Campbell EP, Jama BA (1993) Farming systems research for agroforestry extension. Agrofor Syst 23:219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glendimning A, Mahapatra A, Mitchell CP (2001) Modes of communication and effectiveness of agroforestry extension in eastern India. Human Ecol 29:283–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schlabenberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edition. SAS Institute, Cary. 814 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Matata PZ, Masolwa LW, Ruvuga S, Bagarama FM (2013) Dissemination pathways for scaling-up agroforestry technologies in western Tanzania. J Agric Exten Rural Develop 5:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead R (1991) Designing experiments for agroforestry research. In: Avery M, Cannell MGR, Ong CK (eds) Biophysical research for Asian Agroforestry. Winrock International, Arlington. Pp. 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer DE (2004) Adoption of Agroforestry innovations in the tropics: A review. Agrofor Syst 61–62:311–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinty MM, Swisher ME, Alavalapati J (2008) Agroforestry adoption and maintenance: self-efficacy, attitudes and socio-economic factors. Agrofor Syst 73:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2012) Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinney A (1991) Farmer-augmented designs for participatory agroforestry research. Agrofor Syst 15:275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman A, Ladha JK, Kumar V, Sharma S, Piepho HP (2011) Stability analysis of farmers participatory trials for conservation agriculture using mixed models. Field Crop Resear 121:450–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opio C, Jacob N, Khasa DP (2001) Factors affecting a sheep vegetation management system in British Columbia, Canada. Agrofor Syst 53:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao MR, Coe R (1991) Measuring crop yields in on-farm agroforestry studies. Agrofor Syst 15:275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao MR, Coe R (1992) Evaluating the results of agroforestry research. Agrofor Today 4(1):4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell JT (1991) Yield and yield stability of pure and mixed stands of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Varieties in North Cameroon. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr SJ (1991) On-farm research: The challenges of agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 15:95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherr SJ (1995) Economic analysis of agroforestry systems: the farmers’ perspective. In: Current D, Lutz F, Scherr SJ (eds) Costs, benefits and farmer adoption of agroforestry: Project experience in Central America and the Caribbean. World Bank Environment Paper No 14. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 28–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaner WW, Philipp PF, Schmehl WR (1982) Farming system research and development: Guidelines for developing countries. Westview Press, Boulder, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinkels RA, Franzel S, Shepherd KD, Ohlsson E, Ndufa JK (2002a) The adoption potential of short rotation improved tree fallows: Evidence from western Kenya. In: Franzel SC, Scherr SJ (eds) Trees on the farm: Assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry in Africa. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. Pp. 65–86

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swinkels RA, Shepherd KD, Franzel F, Nduka JK, Ohlsson E, Sjogren H (2002b) Assessing the adoption potential of hedgerow intercropping for improving soil fertility, Western Kenya. In: Scherr SJ (eds) Trees on the farm: Assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry in Africa. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. Pp. 89–110

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin C, Chambers R (1990) Farmer-first: achieving sustainable dryland development in Africa. International institute for environment and development. Issue Paper No 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker DH, Sinclair FL, Thapa B (1995) Incorporation of indigenous knowledge and perspective in agroforestry development. Part 1: review of methods and their application. Agrofor Syst 30:235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wambugu C, Place F, Franzel S (2011) Research, development and scaling-up the adoption of fodder shrub innovations in East Africa. Int J Agric Sustain 9(1):100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber LM, Ison RL (1995) Participatory rural appraisal design: Conceptual and process issues. Agric Syst 47(1):107–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SE, van Noordwijk M, Penot E, Healey JR, Sinclair FL, Wibawa G (2001) On-farm evaluation of the establishment of clonal rubber in multistrata agroforests in Jambi, Indonesia. Agrofor Syst 53:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Atangana .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Atangana, A., Khasa, D., Chang, S., Degrande, A. (2014). On-Farm Agroforestry Research. In: Tropical Agroforestry. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7723-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics