Skip to main content

Suffering on a Global Scale

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Suffering and Quality of Life

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research ((BRIEFSWELLBEING))

  • 1060 Accesses

Abstract

This project helps locate suffering and its severity around the world, showing how public policy could more effectively reduce suffering and increase societal well-being. The research in this chapter creates and validates indicators for both subjective and objective suffering on a global scale. A life satisfaction measure adapted from the Gallup-Healthways surveys of well-being in 123 countries is used as a social indicator of subjective suffering, while indictors of the prevalence of social traumas like HIV illness, hunger, infant deaths, and poverty function as measures of objective suffering. With this objective measure of suffering, it is now possible to estimate that at least one billion peopleā€”a seventh of the worldwide population are in major physical pain at any one time. Gender inequality appears in this analysis as a significant predictor of objective suffering, which implies that gender inequality is a significant cultural barrier to the reduction of suffering. Satisfactory social support networks also were found to help explain variation in national suffering. One interesting finding was that subjective suffering tends to be substantially lower than objective suffering in Latin American countries and a few African countries, and it appears to be related to social solidarity, especially in the family and community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition.

References

  • Breivik, H., Collett, B., Ventafridda, V., Cohen, R., & Gallacher, D. (2006). Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. European Journal of Pain, 20, 287ā€“333.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bromet, E., et al. (2011). Cross-national epidemiology of DSM-IV major depressive episode. BMC Medicine 9:90. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/9/90/. Accessed on 25 April 2013.

  • Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cassell, E. J. (2004). The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Chabal, P. (2009). Africa: The politics of suffering and smiling. London: Zed Books.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Collier, P. (2007). The bottom billionā€”Why the poorest countries are failing, and what can be done about it. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Tov, W., & Arora, R. (2009). Income, aging, health and wellbeing around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing Wellbeing (pp. 233ā€“246). Oxford: Springer.

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Headey, B., Holmstrƶm, E., & Wearing, A. (1984). Well-being and ill-being: different dimensions? Social Indicators Research, 14(2), 13ā€“115.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • HDR (2010) Human Development Report 2010. See UNDP (2010).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. PNAS 107(38), 16489ā€“16493. http://wws.princeton.edu/news/Income_Happiness/Happiness_Money_Report.pdf. Accessed on 13 April 2013.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kelley, A.C. (1989) The international human suffering index: reconsideration of the evidence. Population and Development Review 15(4), pp. 731ā€“737.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nordgren, L. F., Banas, K., & MacDonald, G. (2011). Empathy gaps for social pain: why people underestimate the pain of social suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 120ā€“128.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2001a). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2001b). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach, Harvard University Press, cambridge.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Rath, T., & Harter, J. (2010). Well-Beingā€”The first essential elements. New York: The Gallup Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tsang A, Von Korff, M, Lee S., Alonso, J. Karam, E. et al. (2008). Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. The Journal of Pain. 9(10), 883ā€“891.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • UNDP (2010) Human Development Report 2010. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan for the United Nations Development Program.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald E. Anderson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, R.E. (2014). Suffering on a Global Scale. In: Human Suffering and Quality of Life. SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7669-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics