Advertisement

Case Management in China’s Civil Justice System

  • Cai YanminEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 31)

Abstract

The chapter discusses the establishment from top to bottom of a case management structure in the Chinese court system and the implementation of case quality evaluation index mechanisms. The author questions whether these mechanisms help to increase efficiency and enhance the quality of adjudication and the accountability of the Judicature. Specific attention is given to the people’s assessors’ joining the collegial panel to hear cases, the resolution of disputes by judges through mediation, the application of the simplified procedure to hear cases and the number of cases terminated within the prescribed time limits. In this chapter, it is stated that in China the focus should be shifted from speeding up litigation to improving adjudication with attention given to party initiative and the role of their attorneys.

Keywords

Civil Procedure Supreme People Local Court Ordinary Procedure Civil Justice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chen Yonghui (2007) Significant progress in the construction of the people’s jury system with a Chinese character. People Court Daily, 4 September 2007 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. Li Hao (2010) Rather slower, but better. Macroscopical thinking about China’s civil judicial reform. Peking Univ Law J (6):926 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Ma Shoumin (2010a) Judges: dancers on sticks. People Court Daily, 12 July 2010, p 5 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Ma Shoumin (2010b) How judges deal with stress. People Court Daily, 12 July 2010, p 5 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Peng Xiaolong (2011) Recovery and practice of the people’s assessor system: from 1998 to 2010. Chin J Law (1):15 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Shen Kuan-Ling (2010) Timely trial and case management in civil procedure. Natl Taiwan Univ Law J 39(2):302 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Shi Ying (2008) The decision on improving the people’s jury system has been implemented well. People Court Daily, 2 December 2008 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Survey Group of the Supreme People’s Court (2003) Reports on civil procedure reform. Law Press China, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Taniguchi Yasuhei (1996) Procedural justice and litigation (trans: Wang Yaxin, Liu Rongjun). China University of Political Science and Law Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Wang Fuhua (2008) Remarks on the civil case management system. Leg Forum (2):72 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Xiao Jianguo, Huang Zhongshun (2011) On implicit language in the court mediation process. Tribune Stud (10):54 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Zhang Jiajun (2012) An empirical study on the rate of cases settled by mediation in civil procedure. Chin J Law (1):44 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations