Abstract
The extensive use of modelling in physics research has many implications on how it is used in physics education. An interesting case is the use of models in producing of new knowledge, which we here refer to as generative modelling. Generative modelling can serve as a cognitive tool bridging conceptual reality and real phenomena by mutually fitting of simulations and experiments. In this fitting process of fitting, pursuing partial mimetic similarity in simulations and experiments acquires a central epistemological role. At the core of generative modelling is the creative use of theoretical and empirical elements of modelling as well as the explorative manipulation of real conditions to fit the models. We argue here that such modelling is also identifiable as authentic by the modelling practitioners themselves and that such a modelling approach supports constructively oriented and creative teaching solutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
Nine interviews were in Finnish, and one in English; the authors translated the excerpts.
References
Adúriz-Bravo, A. & Izquierdo-Aymerich, M. (2005). Utilising the ‘3P-model’ to Characterise the Discipline of Didactics of Science, Science & Education 14, 29–41.
Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Blum, W. & Ferri, R. B. (2009). Mathematical Modelling: Can It Be Taught And Learnt?, Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application 1, 45–58.
Bunge, M. (1983). Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy 6, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bozkurt E. & Ilika A. (2010). The Effect of Computer Simulations over Students’ Beliefs on Physics and Physics Success. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences 2, 4587–4591.
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press.
Cartwright, N. (1999). The Dappled World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, H. (2004). Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crawford, B. & Cullin, M. (2004). Supporting Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of Modeling in Science, International Journal of Science Education 26, 1379–1401.
Darling, K. M. (2002). The Complete Duhemian Underdetermination Argument: Scientific Language and Practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33, 511–533.
Develaki, M. (2007). The Model-Based View of Scientific Theories and the Structuring of School Science Programmes, Science & Education 16, 725–749.
Duhem, P. (1914/1954). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (translation of La Théorie Physique: Son Objet, Sa Structure, 2nd ed., 1914 Paris). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S. & LeMaster, R. S. (2005). When learning about the Real world is Better Done Virtually: A Study of Substituting Computer Simulations for Laboratory Equipment, Physical Review ST – PER 1, 010103.
Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giere, R. N. (1999). Science without Laws, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giere, R. N., Bickle, J. & Mauldin, R. F. (2006). Understanding Scientific Reasoning, 5th ed., Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth,
Gilbert, J. K., Pietrocola, M., Zylbersztajn, A. & Franco, C. (2000). Science and Education: Notions of Reality, Theory and Model, in J.K. Gilbert & C.J. Boulter (eds.), Developing Models in Science Education, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Gobert, J. D. & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Introduction to Model-based Teaching and Learning in Science Education, International Journal of Science Education 22, 891–894.
Grandy, R. E. (2003). What Are Models and Why Do We Need Them?, Science & Education 12, 773–777.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Inventing: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haines, C. R. & Crouch R. (2010). Remarks on a Modelling Cycle and Interpreting Behaviours, In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, and A. Hurford (eds), Modeling Students’ Mathematical Modeling Competencies (ICTMA 13), Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 123–128.
Halloun, I. A. (2007). Mediated Modeling in Science Education, Science & Education 16, 653–697.
Heidelberger, M. (1998). From Helmholtz’s Philosophy of Science to Hertz’ Picture Theory. In D. Baird, R.I.G. Hughes and A. Nordmann (eds.), Heinrich Hertz: Classical Physicist, Modern Philosopher, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Hesse, M. B. (1963). Models and Analogies in Science, London: Seed and Ward.
Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward A Modeling Theory of Physics Instruction, American Journal of Physics 55, 440–454.
Hestenes, D. (1992). Modeling Games in the Newtonian World, American Journal of Physics 60, 732–748.
Hestenes, D. (2010). Modeling Theory for Math and Science Education. In R. Lesh, C. R. Haines, P. L. Galbraith and A. Hurford (eds.), Modeling Students’ Mathematical Modeling Competencies (ICTMA 13), Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 13–41.
Hughes, R. I. G. (1997). Models and Representations, Philosophy of Science 67, S325-S336.
Hughes, R. I. G. (1999). The Ising Model, Computer Simulation, and Universal Physics. In M. S. Morgan and M. Morrison (eds.), Models as Mediators, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Humphreys, P. (2004). Extending Ourselves, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Izquierdo-Aymerich, M. & Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2003). Epistemological foundations of school science, Science & Education 12, 27 – 43.
Justi, R.S. & Gilbert, J.K. (2000). History and Philosophy of Science through Models: Some Challenges in the Case of “the atom”, International Journal of Science Education 22, 993–1009.
Justi, R.S. & Gilbert, J.K. (2002). Modelling, Teachers’ Views on the Nature of Modelling and Implications for the Education of Modellers, International Journal of Science Education 24, 369–387.
Koponen, I. T. (2007). Models and Modelling in Physics Education: A Critical Re-analysis of Philosophical Underpinnings and Suggestions for Revisions, Science & Education 16, 751–773.
Matthews, M. R. (1994/2014). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, New York: Routledge.
Matthews, M.R. (1997). Introductory Comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education, Science & Education 6, 5–14.
Morrison, M. (1999). Models as autonomous agents. In M. S. Morgan and M. Morrison M. (eds.), Models as Mediators, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morrison, M. S. & Morgan, M. (1999). Models as Mediating instruments. In M. S. Morgan and M. Morrison (eds.), Models as Mediators, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nersessian, N. (1995). Should Physicists Preach What They Practice? Constructive Modeling in Doing and Learning Physics, Science & Education 4, 203–226.
Nersessian, N. (2008). Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Neves, R. G. (2010). Enhancing Science and Mathematics Education with Computational Modelling, Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application 1, 2–15
Nola, R. (1997). Constructivism in Science and Science Education: A Philosophical Critique, Science & Education 6, 55–83.
Nola, R. (2004). Pendula, Models, Constructivism and Reality, Science & Education 13, 349–377.
Oh, P. S. & Oh, S. J. (2011). What Teachers of Science Need to Know about Models: An Overview, International Journal of Science Education 33, 1109–1130.
Perkins K., Adams W., Dubson M., Finkelstein N., Reid S., Wieman C. & LeMaster R. (2006). PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics. The Physics Teacher 44, 18–22.
Pluta, W. J., Chinn. C. A. & Duncan, R. G. (2011) Learners’ Epistemic Criteria for Good Scientific Models, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48, 486–511.
Riordan, M. (2003). Science Fashions and Scientific Fact’, Physics Today, August 2003, 50.
Schwarz C. V., Reiser B. J., Davis E. A., Kenyon L., Acher A., Fortus D., Shwartz Y., Hug B. & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a Learning Progression for Scientific Modeling: Making Scientific Modeling Accessible and Meaningful for Learners, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46, 632–654.
Sensevy, G., Tiberghien, A., Santini, J., Laube, S. & Griggs, P. (2008). An Epistemological Approach to Modeling: Case Studies and Implications for Science Teaching, Science Education 92, 424–446.
Suárez, M. (1999). The Role of Models in Application of Scientific Theories: Epistemological Implications. In M. S. Morgan and M. Morrison (eds.), Models as Mediators, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suppe, F. (1977). The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed., Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Suppes, P. (1962). Models of Data. In E. Nagel, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the International Congress, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Tala, S. (2011). Enculturation into Technoscience: Analysis of the Views of Novices and Experts on Modelling and Learning in Nanophysics, Science & Education 20, 733–760.
Uhden, O., Karam R., Pietrocola M. & Pospiech G. (2012). Modelling Mathematical Reasoning in Physics Education, Science & Education 21, 485–506.
Van Driel, J. & Verloop, N. (2002). Experienced Teachers’ Knowledge of Teaching and Learning of Models and Modelling in Science Education, International Journal of Science Education 24, 1255–1272.
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). Scientific Image, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wells, M., Hestenes, D. & Swackhamer, G. (1995). A modeling method for high school physics instruction, American Journal of Physics 63, 606–619.
White, B. Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal Models, and Science Education Conceptual Change, Cognition and Instruction 10, 1–100.
Winsberg, E. (2001). Simulations, Models and Theories: Complex Physical Systems and their Representations, Philosophy of Science 68, 442–454.
Winsberg, E. (2003) Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World, Philosophy of Science 70, 105–125.
Winsberg, E. (2006). Models of Success versus the Success of Models: Reliability without Truth, Synthese 152, 1–19.
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by grant 1136582 from the Academy of Finland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koponen, I.T., Tala, S. (2014). Generative Modelling in Physics and in Physics Education: From Aspects of Research Practices to Suggestions for Education. In: Matthews, M. (eds) International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7653-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7654-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)