Abstract
Progress in a research programme requires explicit accounts of the nature of what is being researched that are open to critique and, where necessary, revision. As a starting point for shifting away from the ‘taken-for-granted’ approach to discussing mental phenomena that characterises everyday discourse, towards a more analytical approach suitable for a progressive research programme, this chapter explores how we might understand the mind in science education, and the role it plays in relation to common foci of research such as student understanding, knowing and learning. Three complementary levels for thinking about such foci as thinking, knowledge and so forth are considered: the physical level (in terms of physiology and anatomy); the mental level (in terms of how we describe our subjective experience of mental life); and a functional or ‘systems’ level. It is argued that whilst it is important for research in science education to adopt models constrained by what is learned at the physical level (e.g., in neuroscience), the most productive level to model such matters as student knowledge and learning for most research in science education is the system level, analysing the learner’s cognition in terms of a system that processes information.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Baars, B. J., & McGovern, K. (1996). Cognitive views of consciousness: What are the facts? How can we explain them? In M. Velmans (Ed.), The science of consciousness: Psychological, neuropsychological and clinical reviews (pp. 63–95). London: Routledge.
Behar, R. (2001). Yellow marigolds for Ochun: An experiment in feminist ethnographic fiction. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(2), 107–116. doi:10.1080/09518390010023630.
Bruner, J. S. (1987). The transactional self. In J. Bruner & H. Haste (Eds.), Making sense: The child’s construction of the world (pp. 81–96). London: Routledge.
Changeux, J.-P. (1983/1997). Neuronal man: The biology of mind (L. Garey, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Claxton, G. (2005). The wayward mind: An intimate history of the unconscious. London: Little Brown.
Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 263–275.
Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (Eds.). (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry – Logical or psychological? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 9–15.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980a). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–486.
Libet, B. (1996). Neural processes in the production of conscious experience. In M. Velmans (Ed.), The science of consciousness: Psychological, neuropsychological and clinical reviews (pp. 96–117). London: Routledge.
Mahowald, M. W., & Schenck, C. H. (2000). Parasomnias: Sleepwalking and the law. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 4(4), 321–339. doi:10.1053/smrv.1999.0078.
Norum, K. E. (2000). School patterns: A sextet. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(3), 239–250. doi:10.1080/09518390050019659.
Rees, G. (2007). Neural correlates of the contents of visual awareness in humans. In J. Driver, P. Haggard, & T. Shallice (Eds.), Mental processes in the human brain (pp. 187–202). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Taber, K. S. (2009a). Learning at the symbolic level. In J. K. Gilbert & D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 75–108). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2012). Recognising quality in reports of chemistry education research and practice. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(1), 4–7.
Taber, K. S. (2013c). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156–168. doi:10.1039/C3RP00012E.
Trainor, A. (2003). Poem. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(5), 727–727. doi:10.1080/0951839032000143039.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1986). Thought and language. London: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taber, K.S. (2013). Modelling Mental Activity. In: Modelling Learners and Learning in Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7648-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7648-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7647-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7648-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)