Abstract
This chapter explores the notion of pubic knowledge, and how it relates to an individual’s personal knowledge. It is argued that whereas personal knowledge can be understood in terms of the resources available to support cognition (as discussed in the previous chapter), it is more difficult to identify the possible locus of public knowledge, such as ‘scientific knowledge’ , even though much evaluation of student knowledge in research is undertaken with reference to canonic forms of knowledge. The chapter explores the merits of understanding public knowledge to be in some sense available through the scientific literature, but considers this possibility inconsistent with the analysis earlier in the book suggesting that such inscriptions are simply representations of someone's knowledge that only become meaningful when interpreted by a reader. Other practical difficulties with this perspective are also considered. The alternative notion that public knowledge is distributed, so scientific knowledge is found within and across the scientific community, fares better: but is also problematic if public knowledge is considered as anything more that an idealist referent - a kind of useful fiction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banerjee, A. C. (1991). Misconceptions of students and teachers in chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 487–494.
Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1099–1121. doi:10.1080/09500690500069483.
Bruner, J. S. (1987). The transactional self. In J. Bruner & H. Haste (Eds.), Making sense: The child’s construction of the world (pp. 81–96). London: Routledge.
Coll, R. K., Lay, M. C., & Taylor, N. (2008). Scientists and scientific thinking: Understanding scientific thinking through an investigation of scientists views about superstitions and religious beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 197–214.
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Frolov, I. T. (1991). Philosophy and history of genetics: The inquiry and the debates. London: McDonald & Co.
Glasersfeld, E. v. (1988). The reluctance to change a way of thinking. Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 83–90. Retrieved from http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/EvG/papers/110.pdf
Glasersfeld, E. v. (1990). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. Monographs of the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4, 19–29. Retrieved from http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/EvG/papers/125.pdf
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lidskog, R. (1996). In science we trust? On the relation between scientific knowledge, risk consciousness and public trust. Acta Sociologica, 39(1), 31–56.
Martin, B., & Richards, E. (1995). Scientific knowledge, controversy, and public decision-making. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 506–526). Version accessed at http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/595handbook.html. Newbury Park, CA.
McInerney, C., Bird, N., & Nucci, M. (2004). The flow of scientific knowledge from lab to the lay public: The case of genetically modified food. Science Communication, 26(1), 44–74. doi:10.1177/1075547004267024.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199.
Popper, K. R. (1979). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach (Rev. ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Taber, K. S. (2000a). Finding the optimum level of simplification: The case of teaching about heat and temperature. Physics Education, 35(5), 320–325.
Taber, K. S. (2013b). Personal or collective knowledge: Harry Collins’ notions of tacit knowledge and of the individual as an epistemic parasite. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 114–135.
Van Eijck, M. (2009). Scientific literacy: Past research, present conceptions, and future developments. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Handbook of research in North America (Vol. 1, pp. 245–258). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Ziman, J. (1978/1991). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taber, K.S. (2013). Relating the Learner’s Knowledge to Public Knowledge. In: Modelling Learners and Learning in Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7648-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7648-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7647-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7648-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)