Skip to main content

Attention Versus Consciousness: Fused or Independent?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Solving the Mind-Body Problem by the CODAM Neural Model of Consciousness?

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Cognitive and Neural Systems ((SSCNS,volume 9))

  • 1075 Accesses

Abstract

The American neuroscientist Christof Koch, working with his group at Caltech, has spearheaded the important thesis that consciousness and attention are not as closely fused as is almost universally claimed. The usual statement is that attention to a stimulus in the external world is necessary for consciousness of that stimulus to arise in a subject. More may be needed for that consciousness to arise, but at least attention must be directed to that stimulus in order for there to be any chance of consciousness of the stimulus. This implies that consciousness is to be searched for in the interstices of attention. Koch claims that this is not the case. In particular he and his colleague Tsuchiya (Koch C, Tsuchiya N, Trends Cogn Sci 11(1):16–22, 2007) wrote that consciousness could arise in a subject without them paying attention to the relevant stimulus. This claim was based on several subtle experiments, which clearly we need to analyze in some detail in order to investigate this important claim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bhattacharya J et al (2009) Posterior beta and anterior gamma oscillations predict cognitive insight. J Cogn Neurosci 21(7):1269–1279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christoff K et al (2009) Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(21):8719–8724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A (2004) Being there. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang F, Boyaci H, Kersten D, Murray SO (2008) Attention-dependent representations of a size illusion in V1. Curr Biol 18(21):1707–1712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman-Hill SR, Robertson LC, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG (2003) Posterior parietal cortex and the filtering of distracters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999(7):4263–4268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley M, Taylor JG (2009) Mental simulation, attention and creativity. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5769:40–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He BJ, Raichle M (2009) The fMRI signal, slow cortical potential and consciousness. Trends Cogn Sci 13(7):302–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch C, Tsuchiya N (2007) Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes. Trends Cogn Sci 11(1):16–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kounios J et al (2008) The origin of insight in resting state behaviour. Neuropsychologia 46(1):281–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pastukhov A, Braun J (2007) Perceptual reversals need no prompting by attention. J Vis 7(10):5.1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahnev A, Maniscalco B, Huang E, Bahdo L, Lau H (2009) Weakly attended stimuli produce an inflated sense of subjective visibility (University of Columbia preprint)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG (2007) CODAM: a model of attention leading to the creation of consciousness. Scholarpedia 2(11):1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG, Fragopanagos N (2005) The interaction of attention and emotion. Neural Netw 18(4):353–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG, Fragopanagos N (2007) Resolving some confusions over attention and consciousness. Neural Netw 20(9):993–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JG, Hartley M (2008) Exploring cognitive machines – neural models of reasoning, illustrated through the 2-sticks paradigm. Neurocomputing 71:2411–2419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandervert L (2003) How working memory and cognitive modelling functions of the cerebellum contribute to discoveries in mathematics. New Ideas Psychol 21:159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallas G (1926) The art of thought. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer M (1945) Productive thinking. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Willimzig C, Tsuchiya N, Fahle M, Einhauser W, Koch C (2008) Spatial attention increases performance but not subjective confidence in a discrimination task. J Vis 8(5):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Prof. Lau and Dr. Rahnev for letting me see their paper (Rahnev et al. 2009) before publication as well as for helpful communications concerning other aspects of the subject.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, J.G. (2013). Attention Versus Consciousness: Fused or Independent?. In: Solving the Mind-Body Problem by the CODAM Neural Model of Consciousness?. Springer Series in Cognitive and Neural Systems, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7645-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics