Skip to main content

Faculty Development for Teaching Improvement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Faculty Development in the Health Professions

Part of the book series: Innovation and Change in Professional Education ((ICPE,volume 11))

Abstract

In the mid to late 1950s, the idea of preparing university faculty members as teachers emerged in medical education and since then has become the most common type of faculty development in health professions education. Several competency frameworks for health professions teachers have been described in the literature, each of which includes skills in curriculum design, teaching and support of learning, and assessment and feedback. Several best practice examples demonstrate how these competencies might be addressed in faculty development programming. The literature is limited in the quality of evidence available about what works for teachers, their students, and the systems in which both education and patient care occur. Understanding the ‘what’ and ‘how’ of teaching improvement in health professions education will require more rigorous outcome measures and attention to the individual and shared needs of teachers and learners and the communities of practice in which they work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Academy of Medical Educators. (2008). Annual report and financial statements: 30 September 2008. Available from: http://www.medicaleducators.org/aome/assets/File/Annual%20Report%202008%20final.pdf

  • Academy of Medical Educators. (2012). Professional standards. London, UK: Academy of Medical Educators. Available from: http://www.medicaleducators.org/index.cfm/linkservid/180C46A6-B0E9-B09B-02599E43F9C2FDA9/showMeta/0/

  • Academy of Medical Educators. (n.d.). Educational Supervisors Project. Available from: http://www.medicaleducators.org/index.cfm/profession/edsupervisors

  • Alteen, A. M., Didham P., & Stratton C. (2009). Reflecting, refueling, and reframing: A 10-year retrospective model for faculty development and its implications for nursing scholarship. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 40(6), 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Medical Colleges. (1977). Second preliminary report of the faculty development survey: Special report. Washington, DC: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berbano, E. P., Browning, R., Pangaro, L., & Jackson, J. L. (2006). The impact of the Stanford Faculty Development Program on ambulatory teaching behavior. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(5), 430–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, W. H. & Phillips, S. R. (1975). A handbook for faculty development. Washington, DC: Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, C. J. & Schmitz, C. C. (1986). Characteristics of the successful researcher and implications for faculty development. Journal of Medical Education, 61(1), 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulos, M. N. K., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: A new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Medical Education, 6, 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, W. T. Jr., Frankel, R., Gracey, C. F., Haidet, P. M., Weissmann, P. F., Cantey, P., et al. (2009). A good clinician and a caring person: Longitudinal faculty development and the enhancement of the human dimensions of care. Academic Medicine, 84(1), 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, S. M. & Swanson, D. B. (1998). Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1976). Faculty development practices in U. S. colleges and universities. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chism, N. V. N. & Szabo, B. (1997). How faculty development programs evaluate their services. Journal of Staff, Program and Organizational Development, 15(2), 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, K. A., Barker, L. R., Kolodner, K., Williamson, P., Wright, S. M., & Kern, D. E. (2004). Faculty development in teaching skills: An intensive longitudinal model. Academic Medicine, 79(5), 469–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dath, D. & Iobst, W. (2010). The importance of faculty development in the transition to competency-based medical education. Medical Teacher, 32(8), 683–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J. G. (1975). Toward faculty renewal. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. L., Aagaard, E. M., Caverzagie, K. J., Chick, D. A., Holmboe, E., Kane, G., et al. (2009). Charting the road to competence: Developmental milestones for internal medicine residency training. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 1(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gozu, A., Windish, D. M., Knight, A. M., Thomas, P. A., Kolodner, K., Bass, E. B., et al. (2008). Long-term follow-up of a 10-month programme in curriculum development for medical educators: A cohort study. Medical Education, 42(7), 684–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, J. S. (2006). Identification of competencies for effective dental faculty. Journal of Dental Education, 70(9), 937–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harden, R. M. & Crosby, J. (2000). AMEE guide no. 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer – The twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher, 22(4), 334–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. L., Krause, K. C., Parish, D. C., & Smith, M. U. (2007). Academic competencies for medical faculty. Family Medicine, 39(5), 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmboe, E. S., Ward, D. S., Reznick, R. K., Katsufrakis, P. J., Leslie, K. M., Patel, V. L., et al. (2011). Faculty development in assessment: The missing link in competency-based medical education. Academic Medicine, 86(4), 460–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hueppchen, N., Dalrymple, J. L., Hammoud, M. M., Abbott, J. F., Casey, P. M., Chuang, A. W., et al. (2011). To the point: Medical education reviews - Ongoing call for faculty development. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 205(3), 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irby, D. M. (1978). Clinical teacher effectiveness in medicine. Journal of Medical Education, 53(10), 808–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irby, D. M. (1994). What clinical teachers in medicine need to know. Academic Medicine, 69(5), 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jason, H. (1962). A study of medical teaching practices. Journal of Medical Education, 37(12), 1258–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jason, H. & Westberg, J. (1982). Teachers and teaching in U. S. medical schools. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jozefowicz, R. F., Koeppen, B. M., Case, S., Galbraith, R., Swanson, D., & Glew, R. H. (2002). The quality of in-house medical school examinations. Academic Medicine, 77(2), 156–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, D. E., Thomas, P. A., Howard, D. M., & Bass, E. B. (Eds.). (1998). Curriculum development for medical education: A six-step approach. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumagai, A. K., White, C. B., Ross, P. T., Purkiss, J. A., O'Neal, C. M., & Steiger, J. A. (2007). Use of interactive theater for faculty development in multicultural medical education. Medical Teacher, 29(4), 335–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzie, K. A., Kerfoot, B. P., Hafler, J. P., & Breen, E. M. (2009). Spaced education improves the feedback that surgical residents give to medical students: A randomized trial. American Journal of Surgery, 197(2), 252–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew, M., Eidtson, W. H., Pierre, G. C., & Gillespie, C. C. (2012). Creating an objective structured teaching examination to evaluate a dental faculty development program. Journal of Dental Education, 76(4), 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, J. C. M., Zwierstra, R. P., Fluit, C. R. M. G. & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (1996). Didactische en onderwijskundige scholing van docenten geneeskunde. [Didactic and educational development of medical teachers.] Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 140(16), 894–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. E. (1980). Educating medical teachers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, R. J., Gusic, M. E., & Thorndyke, L. E. (2011). Perspective: Toward a competency framework for faculty. Academic Medicine, 86(10), 1204–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, M. D. & Gillette, N. P. (1999). Developing the instructional skills of new faculty members in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53(1), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, M. D., Lancaster, C. J., & Stone, B. M. (2002). Evaluating the effectiveness of occupational therapy faculty development workshops. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(3), 335–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, W. M., Zanting, A., van Beukelen, P., de Grave, W., Baane, J. A., Bustraan, J. A., et al. (2009). A framework of teaching competencies across the medical education continuum. Medical Teacher, 31(5), 390–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem, N., van der Vleuten, C., & Alfaris, E. A. (2012). Faculty development on item writing substantially improves item quality. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17(3), 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2002). What teachers should know and be able to do. Retrieved January 22nd, 2013, from http://www.nbpts.org/sites/default/files/documents/certificates/what_teachers_should_know.pdf

  • O’Sullivan, P. S. & Irby, D. M. (2011). Reframing research on faculty development. Academic Medicine, 86(4), 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K., Grenny, J., Maxfield, D., McMillan, R., & Switzler, A. (2008). Influencer: The power to change anything. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyton, J. W. R. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching and learning in medical practice. Rickmansworth, UK: Manticore Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. A. & Mitchell, C. A. (1993). A model for clinical teaching and learning. Medical Education, 27(1), 62–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabow, M. W., Wrubel, J., & Remen, R. N. (2007). Authentic community as an educational strategy for advancing professionalism: A national evaluation of the Healer's Art course. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(10), 1422–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S., Poth, C. N., Donoff, M., Humphries, P., Steiner, I., Schipper, S., et al. (2011). Competency-based achievement system: Using formative feedback to teach and assess family medicine residents’ skills. Canadian Family Physician, 57(9), e323–e330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D., Marcdante, K., Morzinski, J., Meurer, L., McLaughlin, C., Lamb, G. et al. (2006). Fifteen years of aligning faculty development with primary care clinician-educator roles and academic advancement at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Academic Medicine, 81(11), 945–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeff, K. M., Stratos, G. A., Berman, J., & Bergen, M. R. (1992). Improving clinical teaching: Evaluation of a national dissemination program. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152(6), 1156–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, S. (2001). A program to teach curriculum development to junior faculty. Family Medicine, 33(5), 382–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, M., Li, S. T., Meyers, F. J., Pratt, D. D., Collins, J. B., Braddock, C., et al. (2011). ‘Teaching as a competency’: Competencies for medical educators. Academic Medicine, 86(10), 1211–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford Faculty Development Center for Medical Teachers. (2012). Stanford Faculty Development Center - Background. Available from: http://sfdc.stanford.edu/background.html

  • Steinert, Y., Boudreau, J. D., Boillat, M., Slapcoff, B., Dawson, D., Briggs, A., et al. (2010). The Osler Fellowship: An apprenticeship for medical educators. Academic Medicine, 85(7), 1242–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Centeno, A., Dolmans, D., Spencer, J., Gelula, M., et al. (2006). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Medical Teacher, 28(6), 497–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, S., Mazor, K., Devaney-O'Neil, S., Starr, S., Ferguson, W., Wellman, S., et al. (2003). Development and implementation of an objective structured teaching exercise (OSTE) to evaluate improvement in feedback skills following a faculty development workshop. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 15(1), 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T. S., Skye, E. P., & Steiger, J. A. (2009). Increasing patient acceptance of medical student participation: Using interactive theatre for faculty development. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 21(3), 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Keulen, H. (2006). Staff development and basic teaching qualification systems in the Netherlands, with a focus on Utrecht University. International Consortium for Educational Development 2006 International Conference: Sheffield, UK. Retrieved August 2nd, 2012, from http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/ivlos/2006-1221-201509/keulen%20-%20towards%20a%20national%20system.pdf

  • Walsh, A. E., Armson, H., Wakefield, J. G., Leadbetter, W., & Roder, S. (2009). Using a novel small-group approach to enhance feedback skills for community-based teachers. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 21(1), 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wass, V. & Archer, J. Assessing learners. (2011). In T. Dornan, K. Mann, A. Scherpbier, & J. Spencer (Eds.), Medical education: Theory and practice, (pp. 229–255). Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, L. & Anderson, W. A. (2004). Hilliard Jason, MD, EdD: A medical student turned medical educator. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9(4), 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, L. & Irby, D. M. (1998). Strategies for improving teaching practices: A comprehensive approach to faculty development. Academic Medicine, 73(4), 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windish, D. M., Gozu, A., Bass, E. B., Thomas, P. A., Sisson, S. D., Howard, D. M., et al. (2007). A ten-month program in curriculum development for medical educators: 16 years of experience. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(5), 655–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. G. & Agisheva, K. (2007). Developing teaching skills for medical educators in Russia: A cross-cultural faculty development project. Medical Education, 41(3), 318–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. G. & Fang, Y. (2012). Improving clinical teaching in China: Initial report of a multihospital pilot faculty development effort. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 24(4), 355–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol S. Hodgson Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A

Appendix A

First three Domains of the 2012 Professional Standards of the Academy of Medical Educators (Re-printed with permission from the Academy of Medical Educators (2012) Professional Standards.)

1.1 Domain 1: Design and Planning of Learning Activities

This domain outlines the expected standards for medical educators involved in educational design and learning development processes. Applicants must demonstrate and referees must corroborate these capabilities.

Element

Standard level 1

Learning and teaching principles

1.1.1 Shows how the principles of learning and teaching are incorporated into educational developments

1.1.2 Is aware of different ways of learning and teaching

Learning needs

1.1.3 Shows how the needs of learners are considered

Learning outcomes

1.1.4 Is aware of the need to define what is to be learned

Learning and teaching methods and resources

1.1.5 Is aware of a range of learning methods, experiences and resources and how they may be used effectively

Evaluation of educational interventions

1.1.6 Responds appropriately to feedback and evaluation of educational interventions

Standard level 2

Standard level 3

1.2.1 Applies learning and teaching principles in the design of a unit, module or subject area

1.3.1 Applies learning and teaching principles in the design of a curriculum for a whole course or degree program

1.2.2 Matches course design to support different ways of learning and teaching

1.2.3 Gathers and interprets basic information on the needs of learners

1.3.2 Conducts complex learning needs analyses including those of learners, groups, professions or healthcare systems

1.2.4 Constructs appropriate learning outcomes that can be measured or judged

1.3.3 Defines learning outcomes within theoretical frameworks

1.2.5 Matches learning methods, experiences and resources to intended outcomes

1.3.4 Is adaptive and effective in securing resources and dealing with constraints

1.2.6 Develops learning resources for planned courses

1.2.7 Evaluates and improves educational interventions

1.3.5 Conducts, interprets, acts on and disseminates evaluations of learning programs

1.2 Domain 2: Teaching and Supporting Learners

This domain outlines the expected standards for medical educators in relation to teaching and facilitating learning. Applicants must demonstrate and referees must corroborate these capabilities.

Element

Standard level 1

Delivering teaching

2.1.1 Appropriately uses a range of learning and teaching methods and technologies

Maintaining an effective learning environment

2.1.2 Is aware of the importance of establishing a safe and effective learning environment

Learning and teaching methods and resources

2.1.3 Is aware of a range of learning methods that may be used in learning and teaching activities

Feedback on learning

2.1.4 Understands the importance of seeking, receiving and responding to feedback about learning and teaching

Participation

2.1.5 Describes ways of involving learners in actual practice e.g. experiential learning opportunities

Reflection

2.1.6 Is aware of the importance of reflection on practice

Standard level 2

Standard level 3

2.2.1 Appropriately uses a broad range of learning and teaching methods and technologies

2.3.1 Is adaptive and innovative in respect to learning and teaching

2.3.2 Supports others to innovate

2.2.2 Establishes an effective learning environment

2.3.3 Monitors and manages complex learning environments

2.2.3 Provides educational, personal and professional support in relevant contexts

2.3.4 Proactively seeks to improve the learning environment

2.2.4 Applies learning and teaching methods that are relevant to programme content

2.3.5 Adapts learning and teaching methods to unexpected circumstances

2.2.5 Uses learning resources appropriately

2.3.6 Develops innovative learning resources

2.2.6 Develops self-awareness in learners

2.3.7 Develops self-awareness in learners and teachers

2.2.7 Listens actively and provides effective feedback to learners using a range of methods

2.3.8 Interprets, synthesizes and deals with conflicting information arising from feedback from learners and educators

2.3.9 Effectively demonstrates to learners the rationale for changing or not changing teaching and learning activities in response to feedback

2.2.8 Engages learners in reflective practice

2.3.10 Actively seeks to incorporate learners into a community of practice

2.2.9 Uses systems of teaching and training that incorporate reflective practice in self and others

2.3.11 Demonstrates a commitment to reflective practice in self, learners and colleagues

1.3 Domain 3: Assessment and Feedback to Learners

This domain outlines the expected standards for medical educators in making and reporting judgments that capture, guide and make decisions about the learning achievement of learners. Applicants must demonstrate and referees must corroborate these capabilities.

Element

Standard level 1

The purpose of the assessment

3.1.1 Is aware of the general purpose of assessment

The content of the assessment

3.1.2 Is aware that assessment should align with the course learning outcomes

The development of assessment

3.1.3 Is aware that good assessment practices are integral to course development

Selecting appropriate assessment methods

3.1.4 Is aware that assessment methods are chosen on the basis of the purpose, content and level of the assessment

3.1.5 Uses a basic range of methods to assess learners

Maintaining the quality of assessment

3.1.6 Is aware that assessment practices require continuous monitoring and improvement

Standard level 2

Standard level 3

3.2.1 Relates the purposes of assessments to the context of the course or programme

3.3.1 Designs complex assessment strategies and blueprints

3.2.2 Demonstrates that the contribution of any assessment addresses the learning outcomes and the assessment blueprint

3.3.2 Maintains and manages assessment blueprints for one or more courses or levels

3.2.3 Contributes to the construction of assessment items

3.3.3 Leads design and development of assessments utilising accepted good practice such as in the determination of reliability, validity, acceptability, cost effectiveness and educational impact

3.2.4 Selects assessment methods that match the purpose, content and level of the learner

3.3.4 Assesses learners using a wide range of methods

3.2.5 Uses a broad range of methods to assess learners

3.2.6 Interprets accurately assessment reports in relation to educational quality management

3.3.5 Contributes under guidance to standard setting processes

3.3.6 Applies standard setting procedures most relevant to particular methods and format

3.3.7 Interprets technical data about effectiveness of assessment practices

3.3.8 Prepares assessment reports for learners, examination boards and external stakeholders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hodgson, C.S., Wilkerson, L. (2014). Faculty Development for Teaching Improvement. In: Steinert, Y. (eds) Faculty Development in the Health Professions. Innovation and Change in Professional Education, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7612-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics