Abstract
In the final chapter, the editors summarise the main findings of the book and draw conclusions for future comparative research in the field. The chapter is divided into four sections. The first section discusses the main points raised in the theoretical approaches elaborated in the first part of the book. The second section deals with the call made by many authors for a non-Eurocentric comparative interregional research agenda. In the final two sections, these conceptual, theoretical and methodological insights are made more explicit by looking at both the internal and external dimensions of interregionalism. The third section draws conclusions about the unpacking of the region and the interests and strategies of various regional actors: the European Commission, the Council, the EU member states, the European Parliament and the Court of Justice. The final section situates interregionalism within the broader context of global governance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abad, G. (2010). Non-Triadic interregionalism. The case of FEALAC. In J. Dosch & O. Jacob (Eds.), Asia and Latin America. Political, economic and multilateral relations (pp. 206–217). Oxon: Routledge.
Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. London: Routledge.
Alter, K. J., & Helfer, L. R. (2010). Nature or nurture? Judicial lawmaking in the European court of justice and the Andean tribunal of justice. International Organization, 64, 563–592.
Bossuyt, F. (2012, March 26). Towards a structurally integrative approach to the study of the EU’s external power: Introducing the concept of ‘transnational power over’. Paper prepared for GR:EEN workshop on quantitative indicators of European power. Bruges.
Cafruny, A., & Ryner, M. (Eds.). (2003). Europe at Bay: In the shadow of US hegemony. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Christiansen, T. (2001). Intra-institutional politics and inter-institutional relations in the EU: Towards coherent governance? Journal of European Public Policy, 8(5), 747–769.
Debusscher, P., & van der Vleuten, A. (2012). Mainstreaming gender in European Union development cooperation with sub-Saharan Africa: Promising numbers, narrow contents, telling silences. International Development Planning Review, 34(3), 319–338.
Doidge, M. (2007). Joined at the hip: Regionalism and interregionalism. Journal of European Integration, 29(2), 229–248.
Dosch, J., & Jacob, O. (Eds.). (2010). Asia and Latin America. Political, economic and multilateral relations. Oxon: Routledge.
Duke, S., & Vanhoonacker, S. (2006). Administrative governance in the CFSP: Development and practice. European Foreign Affairs Review, 11(2), 163–182.
Eriksson Baaz, M. (2005). The paternalism of partnership. A postcolonial reading of identity in development aid. London: Zed Books.
Farrell, M. (2010). A move toward hybrid interregionalism in Asia. In F. Söderbaum & P. Stålgren (Eds.), The European Union and the Global South (pp. 115–140). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Hänggi, H. (2006). Interregionalism as a multifaceted phenomenon: In search of a typology. In H. Hänggi, R. Roloff, & J. Rüland (Eds.), Interregionalism and international relations (pp. 31–62). Abingdon: Routledge.
Hardacre, A. (2010). The rise and fall of interregionalism in EU external relations. Dordrecht: Republic of Letters Publishing.
Hill, C. (1993). The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualising Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3), 305–328.
Hurt, S. R. (2003). Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and ACP states at the end of the Lomé Convention. Third World Quarterly, 24(1), 161–176.
Kohli, A., Evans, P., Katzenstein, P. J., Przeworski, A., Hoeber Rudolph, S., Scott, R. J. C., & Skocpol, T. (1995). The role of theory in comparative politics: A symposium. World Politics, 48, 1–49.
Landman, T., & Robinson, M. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of comparative politics. London: Sage.
Nuttall, S. (2005). Coherence and consistency. In C. Hill & M. Smith (Eds.), The European Union and international relations (pp. 91–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Orbie, J. (2006). Gender in the Euro–Mediterranean partnership. In M. Lister & M. Carbone (Eds.), New pathways in international development (pp. 59–74). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Petö, A., & Manners, I. (2006). The European Union and the value of gender equality. In I. Manners & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), Values and principles in European Union foreign policy (pp. 97–113). London: Routledge.
Pevehouse, J. C. (2005). Democracy from above: Regional organizations and democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pollack, M. A., & Hafner-Burton, E. (2000). Mainstreaming gender in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(3), 450–552.
Prodi, R. (2000, March 31). Europe and global governance. Speech to the second COMECE Congress. Brussels. SPEECH/00/115
Reynaert, V. (2012). The European Union’s foreign policy since the Treaty of Lisbon: The difficult quest for more consistency and coherence. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7(2), 207–226.
Ribeiro Hoffmann, A., & van der Vleuten, A. (Eds.). (2007). Closing or widening the gap? Legitimacy and democracy in regional integration organizations. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Rutazibwa, O. U. (2010). The problematics of the EU’s ethical (self) image in Africa: The EU as an ‘ethical intervener’ and the 2007 joint Africa–EU strategy. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 18(2), 209–228.
Sil, R., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2010). Analytic eclecticism in the study of world politics: Reconfiguring problems and mechanisms across research traditions. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 411–431.
Söderbaum, F., & Stålgren, P. (Eds.). (2010). The European Union and the Global South. Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Spence, D. (2006). The Commission and the Common Foreign and Security Policy. In D. Spence & G. Edwards (Eds.), The European Commission (pp. 356–395). London: John Harper.
Waever, O., & Tickner, A. (Eds.). (2009). International relations scholarship around the world: Worlding beyond the West. Abingdon: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baert, F., Scaramagli, T., Söderbaum, F. (2014). Conclusion. In: Baert, F., Scaramagli, T., Söderbaum, F. (eds) Intersecting Interregionalism. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7566-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7566-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7565-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7566-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)