Abstract
The curricular reforms described in this book are wide-ranging and are driven by many external factors and value systems. They usually begin with a vision of ‘how things should be’, but as we have seen, their implementation is often a travesty of their aims. In this chapter I begin with a synthesis of the values exhibited in curricula across the world, then go on to analyse the kinds of classroom activity that are implied when these are taken seriously. This process will be illustrated through a specific case—a national consultation in England that attempted to elicit, prioritise and exemplify apparently competing values held by mathematics educators. I argue that the misalignment of the intended and enacted curriculum is at least partly due to the almost universal lack of vivid exemplification in curriculum specifications and consequent reductive interpretations of them by their users. An argument is thus made for a serious systematic design-research effort into the production of beautiful examples that illustrate and effectively communicate our core values to the key educational stakeholders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In England, the current draft national curriculum states that ‘varied and frequent’ practice for fluency will lead to improved conceptual understanding. This paragraph explains why this may not be the case.
- 2.
Although the report of the project was 2008, the analysis presented here is new and previously unpublished.
References
Askew, M. (2001). British research into pedagogy. In M. Askew & M. Brown (Eds.), Teaching and learning primary numeracy: policy, practice and effectiveness: a review of British research for the British educational research association in conjunction with the British society for research into learning mathematics. Southwell: BERA.
Askew, M., Hodgen, J., Hossain, S., & Bretscher (2010). Values and variables: mathematics education in high-performing countries. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Atweh, B., & Seah, W. T. (2008). Theorising values and their study in mathematics education. Paper presented at the AARE 2007 International Educational Research Conference. From http://www.aare.edu.au/07pap/atw07578.pdf.
Bell, A. (1993). Some experiments in diagnostic teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(1).
Bell, A., Swan, M., Crust, R., & Shannon, A. (1993). Awareness of Learning, reflection and transfer in school mathematics (Report of ESRC Project R000-23-2329), Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham.
Bishop, A. J., Seah, W. T., & Chin, C. (2003). Values in mathematics teaching: the hidden persuaders? (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. (2003). Improving educational research: toward a more useful, more influential and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3–14.
Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts. London: HMSO.
DfE (2013). Draft programmes of study for KS4 English, maths and science. Available from http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/nationalcurriculum2014/.
DfEE/QCA (1999). Mathematics, the national curriculum for England. London: Department for Education and Employment Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
Guan, Q., & Meng, W. (2007). China’s new national curriculum reform: innovation, challenges and strategies. Frontiers of Education in China, 2(4), 579–604.
Halpin (2010). National curriculum reform in China and England: origins, character and comparison. Frontiers of Education in China, 5(2), 258–269.
Halstead, J., & Taylor, M. (2000). Learning and teaching about values: a review of recent research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 169–202.
Kelly, A. (2003). Theme issue: the role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives, book 2: affective domain. New York: Longman.
Lew, H. C. (2008). Some characteristics in the Korean National Curriculum and its revising process. In Z. Usiskin & E. Willmore (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in Pacific Rim countries: China, Japan, Korea, Singapore. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
NCTM (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
NGA & CCSSO (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. National Governers Association, Council of Chief State School Officers.
QCA (2007). Mathematics: programmes of study for key stage 3 & 4 and attainment targets. In Q. a. C. Authority (Eds.).
Raths, L. E., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. B. (1987). Selections from ‘values and teaching’. In J. P. F. Carbone (Ed.), Value theory and education (pp. 198–214). Malabar: Robert E Krieger.
Rocard, M. (2007). EUR22845—science education now: a renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe.
Schoenfeld, A. (2009). Bridging the cultures of educational research and design. Educational Designer, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume1/issue2/article5/.
Soh, C. K. (2008). An overview of mathematics education in Singapore. In Z. Usiskin & E. Willmore (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in Pacific Rim countries (pp. 23–36). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap (2nd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States (NCES 1999-074). Washington: National Center for Education Statistics.
Swan, M. (2006). Collaborative learning in mathematics: a challenge to our beliefs and practices. London: National Institute for Advanced and Continuing Education (NIACE) for the National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy (NRDC).
Swan, M., & Lacey, P. (2008a). Mathematics matters. National Centre for Excellence in Teaching Mathematics.
Swan, M., & Lacey, P. (2008b). Mathematics matters—an executive summary. National Centre for Excellence in Teaching Mathematics.
Swan, M., & Pead, D. (2008). Reducing road accidents: case study.
Swan, M., Clarke, N., Dawson, C., Evans, S., Jobert, M., & Foster, C. (2012). Mathematics assessment project, http://map.mathshell.org/materials/pd.php. Available from http://map.mathshell.org/materials/index.php.
van den Akker, J. (2012). How can design research support curriculum development? International Society for Design and Development in Education Conference, Utrecht.
van den Akker, J., Graveemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.) (2006). Educational design research. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Swan, M. (2014). Improving the Alignment Between Values, Principles and Classroom Realities. In: Li, Y., Lappan, G. (eds) Mathematics Curriculum in School Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7559-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7560-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)