Abstract
Interactions between changes in biophysical environments (climate, disturbance, and ecological function) and human responses to those changes (management and policy) will determine the effects of climate change on human communities. Effects of climate change on forests could result in a ripple effect of policy and economic response on economic sectors and human communities. The United States produces more timber than any other nation, and although timber volume nearly doubled between 1945 and the late 1980s, production since then has declined. Per capita consumption of wood products has declined since the late 1980s, but population growth has continued to increase consumption to 0.57 billion m3 in the 2000s. Increased production will be concentrated on a smaller land base with a projected net loss of 9.3 million ha of forest land in the United States over the next 50 years, mostly on private lands subject to urbanization. In natural resource-based communities, socioeconomic relationships based on commodities (e.g., timber) or amenities (e.g., recreation) will be disproportionately affected by climate-forest interactions. Anticipated climate changes, coupled with population growth, strongly increase the value of urban trees in providing ecosystem services and for mitigating climate change impacts at fine scales. Policies targeting climate mitigation directly influence forest extent and use, and responses may include more harvesting (a result of new product markets such as biofuels) and altered forest management (responding to demands for forest-based C storage). Preparation for future climate stresses in rural, urban, and wildland-urban interface communities will be enhanced by ensuring that present-day communities have diverse economies and are capable of adapting to change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alig, R. J., Plantinga, A. J., Ahn, S., & Kline, J. D. (2003). Land use changes involving forestry in the United States: 1952 to 1997, with projections to 2050 (Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-587, 92pp). Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Brauman, K. A., Dailey, G. C., Duartel, T. K., & Mooney, H. A. (2007). The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 32, 67–98.
Brooks, N. (2003). Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework (Working Paper 38, 16pp). Norwich: University of East Anglia, School of Environmental Sciences, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
Butler, B. J. (2008). Family forest owners of the United States, 2006 (Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-27, 73pp). Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
Butler, B. J., Tyrrell, M., Feinberg, G., et al. (2007). Understanding and reaching family forest owners: Lessons from social marketing research. Journal of Forestry, 105, 348–357.
Cohen, J. D. (2000). Preventing disaster: Home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Forestry, 98, 15–21.
Cova, T. J., Drews, F. A., Siebeneck, L. K., & Musters, A. (2009). Protective actions in wildfires: Evacuate or shelter-in-place? Natural Hazards Review, 10, 151–162.
Curry, R., Eichman, C., Staudt, A., et al. (2011). Facing the storm: Indian tribes, climate-induced weather extremes, and the future for Indian country (28pp). Boulder: National Wildlife Federation, Rocky Mountain Regional Center.
Davidson, D. J., Williamson, T., & Parkins, J. (2003). Understanding climate change risk and vulnerability in Northern forest-based communities. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33, 2252–2261.
Dimitri, C., Effland, A., & Conklin, N. (2005). The 20th-century transformation of U.S. agriculture and farm policy (Economic Information Bulletin Number EIB3, 17pp). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Fall, S., Niyogi, D., Gluhovsky, A., et al. (2009). Impacts of land use land cover on temperature trends over the continental United States: Assessment using the North American regional reanalysis. International Journal of Climatology, 30, 1980–1993.
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act. (2008). Public Law 110–234. Washington, DC: V.S. Government.
Gimmi, U., Schmidt, S. M., Hawbaker, T. J., et al. (2011). Decreasing effectiveness of protected areas due to increasing development in the surroundings of U.S. National Park Service holdings after park establishment. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 229–239.
Gordon, J., Berry, J., Ferrucci, M., et al. (2003). An assessment of Indian forests and forest management in the United States: By the Second Indian Forest Management Assessment Team for the Intertribal Timber Council (134pp). Portland: Clear Water Printing.
Greenwalt, T., & McGrath, D. (2009). Protecting the city’s water: Designing a payment for ecosystem services program. Natural Resources and Environment, 24, 9–13.
Hammer, R. B., Stewart, S. I., & Radeloff, V. C. (2009). Demographic trends, the wildland-urban interface, and wildfire management. Society and Natural Resources, 22, 777–782.
Haque, C. E., & Etkin, D. (2007). People and community as constituent parts of hazards: The significance of societal dimensions in hazards analysis. Natural Hazards, 41, 271–282.
Heisler, G. M. (1986). Energy savings with trees. Journal of Arboriculture, 12, 113–125.
Howard, J. L., Westby, R., & Skog, K. E. (2010a). Criterion 6 indicator 25: Value and volume of wood and wood products production, including primary and secondary processing (Res. Note FPL-RN-0316, 14pp). Madison: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
Howard, J. L., Westby, R., & Skog, K. E. (2010b). Criterion 6 indicator 28: Total and per capita consumption of wood and wood products in roundwood equivalents (Res. Note FPL-RN-0317, 20pp). Madison: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
Indian Forest Management Assessment Team [IFMAT]. (2003). An assessment of Indian forests and forest management in the United States (134pp). Portland: Intertribal Timber Council.
Iverson, L. R., & Prasad, A. M. (2001). Potential changes in tree species richness and forest community types following climate change. Ecosystems, 4, 186–199.
Karl, T. R., Melillo, J. M., Peterson, T. C. (Eds.). (2009). Global climate change impacts in the United States (196pp). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, P. M., & Adger, W. N. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change, 47, 325–352.
Krutilla, J., & Haigh, J. A. (1978). An integrated approach to National Forest management. Environmental Law, 8, 373–415.
Lal, P., Alavalapati, J., & Mercer, D. E. (2010). Socioeconomic impacts of climate change on rural communities in the United States. In R. J. Alig (Tech. Coord.), Effects of climate change on natural resources and communities: A compendium of briefing papers (Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-837, pp. 73–118). Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Chapter 3.
Larsen, S. C., Foulkes, M., Sorenson, C. J., & Thomas, A. (2011). Environmental learning and the social construction of an exurban landscape in Fremont County, Colorado. Geoforum, 42, 83–93.
Lynn, K., & Gerlitz W. (2006). Mapping the relationship between wildfire and poverty. In P. L. Andrews & B.W. Butler (Comps.), Fuels management—How to measure success (Proceedings RMRS-P-41, pp. 401–415). Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Lynn, K., MacKendrick, K., & Donoghue, E. M. (2011). Social vulnerability and climate change: Synthesis of literature (Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-838, 70pp). Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
McCaffrey, S. (2009). Crucial factors influencing public acceptance of fuels treatments. Fire Management Today, 69, 9–12.
McKinley, D. C., Ryan, M. G., Birdsey, R. A., et al. (2011). A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States. Ecological Applications, 21, 1902–1924.
Mendehsohn, R., Basist, A., Dinar, A., et al. (2007). What explains agricultural performance: Climate normals or climate variance? Climatic Change, 81, 85–99.
Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W. D., & Shaw, D. (1994). The impact of global warming on agriculture: A Ricardian analysis. American Economic Review, 84, 753–771.
National Fire Protection Association [NFPA]. (2011). Firewise at NFPA: A brief history. http://www.firewise.org/About/History.aspx. Accessed 10 Jan 2012.
Nowak, D. J. (2000). The interactions between urban forests and global climate change. In K. K. Abdollahi, Z. H. Ning, & A. Appeaning (Eds.), Global climate change and the urban forest (pp. 31–44). Baton Rouge: GCRCC and Franklin Press.
Nowak, D. J. (2010). Urban biodiversity and climate change. In N. Muller, P. Werner, & J. G. Kelcey (Eds.), Urban biodiversity and design (pp. 101–117). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Nowak, D. J., & Greenfield, E. J. (2012a). Tree and impervious cover change in U.S. cities. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11, 21–30.
Nowak, D. J., & Greenfield, E. J. (2012b). Tree and impervious cover in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107, 21–30.
Nowak, D. J., Greenfield, E. J., Hoehn, R., & La Point, E. (2013). Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environmental Pollution, 178, 229–236.
Nowak, D. J., & Walton, T. (2005). Projected urban growth and its estimated impact on the U.S. forest resource (2000–2050). Journal of Forestry, 103, 383–389.
Nowak, D. J., Rowntree, R. A., McPherson, E. G., et al. (1996). Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36, 49–57.
Nowak, D. J., Noble, M. H., Sisinni, S. M., & Dwyer, J. F. (2001). Assessing the US urban forest resource. Journal of Forestry, 99, 37–42.
Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E., & Dwyer, J. F. (2002a). Compensatory value of urban trees in the United States. Journal of Arboriculture, 28, 194–199.
Nowak, D. J., Stevens, J. C., Sisinni, S. M., & Luley, C. J. (2002b). Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture, 28, 113–122.
Nowak, D. J., Walton, J. T., Dwyer, J. F., et al. (2005). The increasing influence of urban environments on U.S. forest management. Journal of Forestry, 103, 377–382.
Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E., & Stevens, J. C. (2006). Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 4, 115–123.
Pachauri, R. K., & Reisinger, A. (Eds.). 2007. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report (104pp). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pevar, S. L. (1992). The rights of Indians and tribes: The basic ACLU guide to Indian and tribal rights (2nd ed., 315pp). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Polsky, C., Neff, R., & Yarnal, B. (2007). Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: The vulnerability coping diagram. Global Environmental Change, 17, 472–485.
Radeloff, V. C., Hammer, R. B., & Stewart, S. I. (2005). The wildland urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications, 15, 799–805.
Radeloff, V. C., Stewart, S. I., Hawbaker, T. J., et al. (2010). Housing growth in and near United States’ protected areas limits their conservation value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 940–945.
Schlenker, W., & Roberts, M. J. (2009). Nonlinear temperature effects indicate sever damages to US crop yields under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 15594–15598.
Shepherd, J. M. (2005). A review of current investigations of urban-induced rainfall and recommendations for the future. Earth Interactions, 9, 1–6.
Shepherd, J. M., Pierce, H., & Negri, A. J. (2002). Rainfall modification by major urban areas: Observations from spaceborne rain radar on the TRMM satellite. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 41, 689–701.
Slovik, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.
Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 282–292.
Smith, W. B., Miles, P. D., Perry, C. H., & Pugh, S. A. (2009). Forest resources of the United States, 2007 (Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-78, 336pp). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., et al. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis—Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (996pp). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Theobald, D. M., & Romme, W. H. (2007). Expansion of the US wildland–urban interface. Landscape and Urban Planning., 83, 340–354.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). U.S. census data. www.census.gov. Accessed Jan 2007.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service [USDA ERS]. (2011). Atlas of rural and small-town America. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/ruralatlas
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. (2011). National report on sustainable forests—2010 (FS-979). Washington, DC.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. (2012). Future of Americas forest and rangelands: Forest Service 2010 Resources Planning Act assessment (Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-87, 198pp). Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2008). Heat island effect. http://www.epa.gov/hiri/. Accessed July 2008.
Vose, J. M., Peterson, D. L., & Patel-Weynand, T. (2012). Effects of climatic variability and change on forest ecosystems: a comprehensive science synthesis for the U.S. forest sector. (Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-870, 265 pp). Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Wade, A. A., & Theobald, D. M. (2010). Residential development encroachment on U.S. protected areas. Conservation Biology, 24, 151–161.
Watson, R. T. (Ed.). (2001). Climate change 2001: Synthesis report (398pp). Cambridge/ New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wear, D. N. (2011). Forecasts of county-level land uses under three future scenarios: A technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA assessment (Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-141, 41pp). Asheville: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station.
Wear, D. N., & Greis, J. G. (Eds.). (2011). The Southern forest futures project: Technical report. http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/futures/reports/draft/pdf/technicalreport.pdf Accessed 27 June 2012.
Wear, D. N., & Prestemon, J. (2004). Timber market research, private forests, and policy rhetoric. In M. Rauschner, & K. Johnsen (Eds.), Southern forest science: Past, present and future (Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-75, pp. 289–300). Asheville: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station.
Williams, M. (1989). Americans and their forests: A historical geography (599pp). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Willkinson, C. F., & Anderson, H. M. (1987). Land and resource planning in the national forests (396pp). Washington, DC: The Island Press.
Yaffee, S. L. (1994). The wisdom of the spotted owl: policy lessons for a new century (430pp). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wear, D.N., Joyce, L.A., Butler, B.J., Gaither, C.J., Nowak, D.J., Stewart, S.I. (2014). Climate Change and Forest Values. In: Peterson, D., Vose, J., Patel-Weynand, T. (eds) Climate Change and United States Forests. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 57. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7515-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7515-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7514-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7515-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)