Abstract
Ecosystem ecology provides a powerful framework to understand and care for biota and the environment. However, ecosystem ecologists have been limited in their abilities to share their knowledge with people outside of academia – particularly underserved audiences and those who have little exposure to science and nature – even though this would benefit scientists and society at large. I have developed the Research Ambassador Program, a project that recruits and guides ecosystem scientists of all ages to carry out innovative science outreach to audiences that traditionally have little or no contact with nature or the enterprise of ecosystem science. I present case studies that provide models for ecosystem scientists to link the ecological values of the organisms and processes they study to other societal values, including recreational, religious, aesthetic, emotional, and social justice values. I describe how non-scientific values have inspired and motivated some of the prominent ecologists of our time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bell L (2008) Engaging the public in technology policy: a new role for science museums. Sci Commun 29:386–398
Bell P, Lewenstein B, Shouse AW, Feder MA (eds) (2009) Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits committee on learning science in informal environments. National Research Council, Washington, DC
Bodmer W (1986) Public understanding of science. Birkbeck College, London
Brice Heath SB, Smyth L (1999) Artshow: youth and community development. Partners for Livable Communities, Washington, DC
Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (2009) Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education, Washington, DC
Dunwoody S (1992) The challenge for scholars of popularized science: explaining ourselves. Public Underst Sci 1:11–14
Epstein JL (1995) School/family community partnerships: caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan 79:701–711
Falk J (2001) Free-choice science education: how we learn outside of school. Teachers College Press, New York
Fischer A, Nadkarni NM (2005) Moss conservation behind bars: prison inmates help researchers cultivate threatened mosses. Conserv Pract 6:35–36
Friedman S, Dunwoody S, Rogers C (1986) Scientists and journalists: reporting science as news. Free Press, New York
Gregory J, Miller S (1998) Science in public: communication, culture, and credibility. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge
Leshner A (2003) Public engagement with science. Science 299:977
Leshner A (2007) Outreach training needed. Science 315:161
McCallie E, Bell P, Lohwater T, Falk JH, Lehr JL, Lewenstein BV, Needham C, Wiehe B (2009) Many experts, many audiences: public engagement with science and informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE), Washington, DC: http://caise.insci.org/uploads/docs/public_engagement_with_science.pdf
Nadkarni NM (2006) The moss-in-prison project: disseminating science beyond academia. Front Ecol Environ 4:442–443
Nadkarni NM (2007) Ecological outreach to faith-based communities. Front Ecol Environ 5:332–333
Nadkarni N, Solano R (2002) Potential effects of climate change on canopy communities in a tropical cloud forest: an experimental approach. Oecologia 131:580–584
Nadkarni N, Stasch A (2013) How broad are our impacts? An analysis of the National Science Foundation’s Ecosystem Studies Program and the Broader Impacts requirement. Front Ecol Environ 11:13–19
Nadkarni N, Schaefer D, Matelson T, Solano R (2004) Biomass and nutrient pools of canopy and terrestrial components in a primary and a secondary montane cloud forest, Costa Rica. For Ecol Manage 198:223–236
National Science Board (2010) Science and engineering indicators 2010. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/. Viewed 15 Apr 2013
National Science Foundation (2012) New Merit Criteria. http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/. Viewed 15 Apr 2013
Pacific Science Center (2010) Portal to the public initiative. Seattle, WA. http://www.pacificsciencecenter.org/Portal-to-the-Public/portal. Viewed 15 Apr 2013
Pew Research Center Forum on Religion and Public Life (2012) Global religious landscape. http://www.pewforum.org/global-religious-landscape-exec.aspx
Poliakoff E, Webb T (2007) What factors predict scientist’s intention to participate in public engagement of science activities? Sci Commun 29:242–250
Thomas G, Durant J (1987) Why should we promote the public understanding of science? In: Shortland M (ed) Scientific literacy papers. Oxford University, Oxford, pp 1–14
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nadkarni, N.M. (2013). Not Such Strange Bedfellows: Underserved Public Audiences as Collaborators for Ecologists. In: Rozzi, R., Pickett, S., Palmer, C., Armesto, J., Callicott, J. (eds) Linking Ecology and Ethics for a Changing World. Ecology and Ethics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7470-4_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7470-4_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7469-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7470-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)