Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Collective Action

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agriculture and Public Goods

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the definitions, role and characteristics of collective action, with a particular focus on the main strategies and dynamics regarding its role in proving public goods through agriculture. It is argued that a very relevant issue to be considered when analyzing the dynamics of collective action is what type of organization develops and manages such action, and this chapter provides a detailed description of the main institutional arrangements that may favour the development of grass roots collective action in rural areas. The first part of the chapter shows that some innovative institutional arrangements based on mixed private-public solutions, such as co-production and co-management, may represent effective territorial strategies to promote and support collective action related to the management of natural resources. The second part of the chapter describes the relevance of social capital in implementing those institutional arrangements in rural areas as well as the necessary shift towards a new structure of the agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in agriculture. The Agricultural Innovation System (AIS) should be re-configured in order to favor the implementation of collective strategies aimed at providing public goods through agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrawal A (2001) Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Devel 29(10):1649–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayer HW (1997) Grass roots collective action: agricultural opportunities. J Agric Resource Econ 22(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Baland JM, Platteau JP (1996) Halting degradation of natural resources: is there a role for rural communities? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manage 90(5):1692–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackstock KL, Ingram J, Burton R, Brown KM, Slee B (2010) Understanding and influencing behaviour change by farmers to improve water quality. Sci Total Environ 408(23):5631–5638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1986) Forms of capital. In: Richards JC (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunori G, Berti G, Klerkx L, Tisenkopfs T, Roep D, Moschitz H, Home R (2011) Learning and Innovation Networks for Sustainable Agriculture. WP2—Conceptual Framework, SOLINSA EU project

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan MS (2006) Social change and the adoption and adaptation of knowledge claims: whose truth do you trust in regard to sustainable agriculture? Agric Human Values 23(3):325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahal GR, Adhikari KP (2008) Bridging, linking, and bonding social capital in collective action. Capri Working paper No. 79

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson-Hunt IJ, O’Flaherty RM (2007) Researchers, indigenous peoples and place-based learning communities. Soc Natur Resour 20(4):291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies B, Blackstock K, Brown K, Shannon P (2004) Challenges in creating local agri-environmental cooperation action amongst farmers and other stakeholders. The Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen

    Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA (2008) Understanding Behaviours in a Farming Context: Bringing Theoretical and Applied Evidence together from Across Defra and Highlighting Policy Relevance and Implications for Future Research, November. Defra Agricultural Change and Environment Observatory Discussion Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuffic P, Candau J (2006) Farming and landscape management: how French farmers are coping with the ecologization of their activities. J Agric Environ Ethics 19(6):563–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enengel B, Penker M, Muhar A, Williams R (2011) Benefits, efforts and risks of participants in landscape co-management: an analytical framework. J Environ Manage 92(4):1256–1267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EU SCAR (2012) Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems in Transition: a Reflection Paper. http://ec.europa.eu/research/agriculture/scar/pdf/akis_web.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2012

  • Gatzweiler F (2006) Organizing a public ecosystem service economy for sustaining biodiversity. Ecolog Econ 59(3):296–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn K, Artz K, Peters U (2002) Institutional arrangements for environmental co-operatives: a conceptual framework. In: Hagedorn K (ed) Environmental cooperation and institutional change: theories and policies for European agriculture. Elgar, Cheltenam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M (2011) The energetic society. In search of a governance philosophy for a clean economy. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge I (2001) Beyond agri-environmental policy: towards an alternative model of rural environmental governance. Land Use Pol 18(2):99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge I, McNally S (2000) Wetland restoration, collective action and the role of water management institutions. Ecolog Econ 35(1):107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge I, Reader M (2007) Maximising the Provision of Public Goods from Future Agri-environment Schemes. Final Report for Scottish Natural Heritage, Rural Business Unit, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Knickel K, Brunori G, Rand S, Proost J (2009) Towards a better conceptual framework for innovation processes in agriculture and rural development: from linear models to systemic approaches. J Agric Edu Ext 15(2):131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantino F (2010) Understanding delivery mechanisms in EU rural development policies: an institutional approach. Paper presented at the 118th Seminar of the EAAE “Rural Development: governance, policy design and delivery”, Ljubljana, Slovenia August 25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall G (1998) A dictionary of sociology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick R, Di Gregorio M, McCarthy N (2004) Methods for studying collective action in rural development. Agric Syst 82(3):197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills J, Gibbon D, Ingram J, Reed M, Short C, Dwyer J (2010) Collective action for effective environmental management and social learning in Wales. Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, 4–7 July 2010. Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013) Providing Agri-environmental Public Goods through Collective Action. OECD Publishing, Paris http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264197213-en

  • Olson M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1996) Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Devel 24(6):1073–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2000) Social capital: a fad or a fundamental concept? In: Dasgupta P, Sarageldin I (eds) Social capital. A multifaceted perspective. The World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2004) Understanding collective action. In: Meinzen-Dick R, Gregorio M Di (eds) Collective action and property rights for sustainable development, 2020 vision for food, agriculture and the environment. Focus 11, IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) Collective Action Theory. In: Boix C, Stokes S (eds) The Oxford handbook of comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Polman N, Poppe KJ, Schans JW van Der, Ploeg JD van der (2010) Nested markets with common pool resources in multifunctional agriculture. Rivista di Economia Agraria LXV(2):295–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J (2003) Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302:1912–1914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Ward H (2001) Social capital and the environment. World Devel 29(2):209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam RD, Leonardi L, Nanetti R (1993) Making democracy work. Civil traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling NG, Wagemakers MAE (eds) (1998) Facilitating sustainable agriculture: participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd MA (2000) Live long and prosper: collective action, social capital and social vision. Ecolog Econ 34(1):131–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid O, Padel S, Levidow L (2012) The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective. Bio base. Appl Econ 1(1):47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider F, Fry P, Ledermann T, Rist S (2009) Social learning processes in Swiss soil protection—the ‘from farmer—to farmer’ project’. Hum Ecol 37(4):475–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schusler TM, Decker DJ, Pfeffer MJ (2003) Social learning for collabourative natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 16(4):309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton S (1998) Constructing cooperation: the evolution of institutions of comanagement. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton S, Taylor M (1992) Common property, collective action and community. J Theor Polit 4(3):309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton S (2002) Cooperation or capture? The paradox of co-management and community participation in natural resource management and environmental policy making. Environ Polit 9(2):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielman DJ, Birner G (2008) How innovative is your agriculture? using innovation indicators and benchmarks to strengthen national agricultural innovation systems. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 41. The World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert P, Barzman M, Billaud JP, Brives H, Hubert B, Ollivier G, Roche B (2007) The role of knowledge and research in facilitating social learning among stakeholders in natural resources management in the French Atlantic coastal wetlands. Environ Sci Pol 10(6):537–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarnoczi TJ, Berkes F (2010) Sources of Information for Farmers’ Adaptation Practices in Canada’s Priairie Agro-Ecosystem. Climatic Change 98(1–2):299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uetake T (2012) Providing agri-environmental public goods through collective action: lessons from New Zealand case studies. Paper presented at the 2012 NZARES Conference, Tahuna Conference Centre—Nelson, New Zealand. August 30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Huylenbroeck G (2008) Market and rural policy institutions to stimulate multifunctional food and fibre production. In: Cesaro L, Gatto P, Pettenella D (eds) The Multifunctional Role of Forests—Policies, Methods and Case Studies. EFI Proceedings No. 55

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Huylenbroeck G, Vuylsteke A, Verbeke W (2009) Public Good Markets: The Possible Role of Hybrid Governance Structures in Institutions for Sustainability. In: Beckmann V, Padmanabhan M (eds) Institutions and sustainability political economy of agriculture and the environment—essays in honour of Konrad Hagedorn. Springer Science and Business Media BV

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade R (1987) The management of common property resources: collective action as an alternative to privatisation or state regulation. Cambridge J Econ 11(2):95–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade R (1988) Village republics: economics conditions for collective action in South India. ICS Press, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2006) Enhancing agricultural innovation: how to go beyond the strengthening of research systems. The World Bank, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2009) World Development Report 2010: development and climate change. The World Bank, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Nazionale di Economia Agraria (INEA), Via Nomentana 41, 00161, Rome, Italy

    Francesco Vanni

Authors
  1. Francesco Vanni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Vanni .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vanni, F. (2014). The Role of Collective Action. In: Agriculture and Public Goods. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7457-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation