Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Information Content of Wolf (and Dog) Social Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biocommunication of Animals

Abstract

Wolves have a remarkably complex social system: they breed, hunt and keep large territories cooperatively. To maintain such an elaborate system, a similarly complex and sophisticated communication system would also be expected. Based on this, studying the vocal communication of wolves and comparing it with other canids of different levels of sociality can give an interesting insight to the relationship between social and communicative complexity and in the long run help to better understand the evolutionary origins of human language. Furthermore, the direct comparison of the wolf and dog vocal repertoire can provide intriguing details about the process of domestication.

In the following chapter we will describe the basic elements of the wolf and dog vocal repertoire, show their potential capability to convey information about the caller, its inner state and possibly the context of the vocalization. We will attempt to point out gaps in understanding regarding wolf and dog vocal communication, potential pitfalls in the current approaches and finally formulate possible directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold K, Zuberbühler K (2011) Call combinations in monkeys: compositional or idiomatic expressions? Brain Lang 1–7:303–309. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.10.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Aureli F, De Waal FBM (2000) Natural conflict resolution. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson E, Ratnakumar A, Arendt M-L et al (2013) The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 495:360–364. doi:10.1038/nature11837

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bálint A, Faragó T, Miklósi Á, Pongrácz P (submitted) Based on their growls, playful dogs are perceived larger than their actual size by their canine audience. Appl Anim Behav Sci

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher N (1963) Physical and behavioral analysis of dog vocalizations. Am J Vet Res 24:415–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Armitage KB (1997) Alarm calling in yellow-bellied marmots: I. The meaning of situationally variable alarm calls. Anim Behav 53:143–171. doi:10.1086/286062

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Chi YY (2011) Scared and less noisy: glucocorticoids are associated with alarm call entropy. Biol Lett 8:189–192. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0832

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boitani L, Ciucci P (1995) Comparative social ecology of feral dogs and wolves. Ethol Ecol Evol 7:49–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanni R, Cafazzo S, Valsecchi P, Natoli E (2010a) Effect of affiliative and agonistic relationships on leadership behaviour in free-ranging dogs. Anim Behav 79:981–991. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.021

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanni R, Natoli E, Cafazzo S, Valsecchi P (2010b) Free-ranging dogs assess the quantity of opponents in intergroup conflicts. Anim Cogn 14(1):103–115. doi:10.1007/s10071-010-0348-3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanni R, Valsecchi P, Natoli E (2010c) Pattern of individual participation and cheating in conflicts between groups of free-ranging dogs. Anim Behav 79:957–968. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.016

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafazzo S, Valsecchi P, Bonanni R, Natoli E (2010) Dominance in relation to age, sex, and competitive contexts in a group of free-ranging domestic dogs. Behav Ecol 21:443–455. doi:10.1093/beheco/arq001

    Google Scholar 

  • Candiotti A, Zuberbühler K, Lemasson A (2011) Context-related call combinations in female Diana monkeys. Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-011-0456-8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chang RS, Thompson NS (2011) Whines, cries, and motherese: their relative power to distract. J Soc Evol Cult Psychol 5:131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton BD, Zhihe Z, Snyder RJ (2009) The information content of giant panda, Ailuropoda melanoleuca, bleats: acoustic cues to sex, age and size. Anim Behav 78:893–898. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.029

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton BD, Swaisgood RR, Zhihe Z, Snyder RJ (2012) Giant pandas attend to androgen-related variation in male bleats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (Print) 66:969–974. doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1345-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock J (1995) Origins of the dog: domestication and early history. In: Serpell J (ed) The domestic dog its evolution behaviour and interactions with people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JA, Fox MW (1976) Vocalizations in wild canids and possible effects of domestication. Behav Process 1:77–92. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(76)90008-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Cools AKA, Van Hout AJ-M, Nelissen MHJ (2008) Canine reconciliation and third-party-initiated postconflict affiliation: do peacemaking social mechanisms in dogs rival those of higher primates? Ethology 114:53–63. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01443.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppinger RP, Feinstein M (1991) “Hark! Hark! the dogs bark.” and bark and hark. Smithonian 21:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppinger RP, Schneider R (1995) Evolution of working dogs. In: Serpell JA (ed) The domestic dog: its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 21–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordoni G, Palagi E (2008) Reconciliation in wolves (Canis lupus): new evidence for a comparative perspective. Ethology 114:298–308. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01474.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar RIM (1998) Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Faber and Faber, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fant G (1960) Acoustic theory of speech production. Mouton De Gruyter, The Hauge

    Google Scholar 

  • Faragó T, Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á et al (2010a) Dogs’ expectation about signalers’ body size by virtue of their growls. PLoS One 5:e15175. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faragó T, Pongrácz P, Range F et al (2010b) “The bone is mine”: affective and referential aspects of dog growls. Anim Behav 79:917–925. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Faragó T, Takács N, Miklósi Á, Pongrácz P (in prep) Assessment of inner state and context recognition from growls by human listeners

    Google Scholar 

  • Feddersen-Petersen DU (2000) Vocalization of European wolves (Canis lupus lupus L.) and various dog breeds (Canis lupus f. familiaris). Archive für Tierzucht Dummerstorf 43:387–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Hammerschmidt K, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2002) Acoustic features of male baboon loud calls: influences of context, age, and individuality. J Acoust Soc Am 111:1465. doi:10.1121/1.1433807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Kitchen DM, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2004) Baboon loud calls advertise male quality: acoustic features and their relation to rank, age, and exhaustion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (Print) 56:140–148. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0739-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WT (1997) Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. J Acoust Soc Am 102:1213–1222. doi:10.1121/1.421048

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WT (1999) Acoustic exaggeration of size in birds via tracheal elongation: comparative and theoretical analyses. J Zool 248:31–48. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01020.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WT (2000) The phonetic potential of nonhuman vocal tracts: comparative cineradiographic observations of vocalizing animals. Phonetica 57:205–218. doi:10.1159/000028474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WT, Hauser MD (2003) Unpacking “Honesty”:vertebrate vocal production and the evolution of acoustic signals. In: Simmons AM, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Acoustic communication. Springer, New York, pp 65–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WT, Reby D (2001) The descended larynx is not uniquely human. Proc R Soc B 268:1669–1675. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1704

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WT, Neubauer J, Herzel H (2002) Calls out of chaos: the adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Anim Behav 63:407–418. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1912

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WT, Huber L, Bugnyar T (2010) Social cognition and the evolution of language: constructing cognitive phylogenies. Neuron 65:795–814. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.011

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox MW, Cohen JA (1977) Canid communication. How animals communicate

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser ON, Stahl D, Aureli F (2008) Stress reduction through consolation in chimpanzees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:8557–8562. doi:10.1073/pnas.0804141105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gácsi M, Győri B, Virányi Z et al (2009a) Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills. PLoS One 4:e6584. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006584

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gácsi M, McGreevy PD, Kara E, Miklósi Á (2009b) Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs. Behav Brain Funct. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman JA, Phillips DP, Fentress JC (1995) An acoustic basis for maternal recognition in timber wolves (Canis lupus)? J Acoust Soc Am 97:1970

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hare B (2007) From nonhuman to human mind: what changed and why? Curr Dir Psychol Sci 16:60–64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00476.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare B, Tomasello M (2005a) The emotional reactivity hypothesis and cognitive evolution. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 9:464–465. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.010

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare B, Tomasello M (2005b) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 9:439–444. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare B, Plyusnina IZ, Ignacio N et al (2005) Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Curr Biol 15:226–230. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.040

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington FH (1986) Timber wolf howling playback studies: discrimination of pup from adult howls. Anim Behav 34(5):1575–1577

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington FH (1987) Aggressive howling in wolves. Anim Behav 35:7–12. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80204-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington FH (1989) Chorus howling by wolves: acoustic structure, pack size and the beau geste effect. Bioacoustics 2:117–136. doi:10.1080/09524622.1989.9753122

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington FH, Mech LD (1978) Wolf vocalization. In: Sharp RL, Hall HS (eds) Wolf and man: evolution in parallel. Academic, New York, pp 109–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington FH, Mech LD (1979) Wolf howling and its role in territory maintenance. Behaviour 68:207–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington FH, Mech LD (1983) Wolf pack spacing: howling as a territory-independent spacing mechanism in a territorial population. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (Print) 12:161–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Janik VM, Sayigh LS, Wells RS (2006) Signature whistle shape conveys identity information to bottlenose dolphins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:8293–8297. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509918103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joslin P (1967) Movements and home sites of timber wolves in Algonquin Park. Am Zool 7:279–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappe T (1996) Subjective resource value and the intensity of threat vocalizations in European wolves (Canis lupus lupus). Zeitschrift für Saugetierkunde 62:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS et al (2005) Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438:803–19. doi:10.1038/nature04338

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lord K, Feinstein M, Coppinger RP (2009) Barking and mobbing. Behav Process 81:358–368. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2009.04.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW, Carr GM (1995) Variation in dog society: between resource dispersion and social flux. In: Serpell JA (ed) The domestic dog: its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 199–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Manser MB, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2002) Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 6:55–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Manteuffel G, Puppe B, Schön P-C (2004) Vocalization of farm animals as a measure of welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 88:163–182. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.02.012

    Google Scholar 

  • McComb K, Reby D (2009) Communication in terrestrial animals. Communication. Elsevier/Academic, Oxford, pp 1167–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • McComb K, Semple S (2005) Coevolution of vocal communication and sociality in primates. Biol Lett 1:381–385. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mech LD (1970) The wolf: the ecology and behavior of an endangered species. Natural History Press, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech LD, Boitani L (2010) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? Anim Behav 67(6):995–1004. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnár C, Pongrácz P, Dóka A, Miklósi Á (2006) Can humans discriminate between dogs on the base of the acoustic parameters of barks? Behav Process 73:76–83. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.014

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnár C, Pongrácz P, Faragó T et al (2009) Dogs discriminate between barks: the effect of context and identity of the caller. Behav Process 82:198–201. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.011

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES (1977) On the occurrence and significance of motivation – structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am Nat 111:855–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak S, Jędrzejewski W, Schmidt K et al (2006) Howling activity of free-ranging wolves (Canis lupus) in the Białowieża Primeval Forest and the Western Beskidy Mountains (Poland). J Ethol 25:231–237. doi:10.1007/s10164-006-0015-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohala JJ (1996) Ethological theory and the expression of emotion in the voice. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on spoken language, 1996. ICSLP 96. pp 1812–1815

    Google Scholar 

  • Owren MJ, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (1997) The acoustic features of vowel-like grunt calls in chacma baboons (Papio cyncephalus ursinus): implications for production processes and functions. J Acoust Soc Am 101:2951–2963

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Packard JM (2003) Wolf behavior: reproductive, social, and intelligent. Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. …

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal SK, Ghosh B, Roy S (1998a) Dispersal behaviour of free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) in relation to age, sex, season and dispersal distance. Appl Anim Behav Sci 61:123–132. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00185-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal SK, Ghosh B, Roy S (1998b) Agonistic behaviour of free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) in relation to season, sex and age. Appl Anim Behav Sci 59:331–348. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00108-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios V, Font E, Márquez R (2007) Iberian wolf howls: acoustic structure, individual variation, and a comparison with north American populations. J Mammal 88:606–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Palagi E, Cordoni G (2009) Postconflict third-party affiliation in Canis lupus: do wolves share similarities with the great apes? Anim Behav 78:979–986. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.017

    Google Scholar 

  • Passilongo D, Buccianti A, Dessì-Fulgheri F et al (2010) The acoustic structure of wolf howls in some eastern tuscany (central Italy) free ranging packs. Bioacoustics 19:159–175. doi:10.1080/09524622.2010.9753622

    Google Scholar 

  • Pongrácz P, Molnár C, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (2005) Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations. J Comp Psychol 119:136–144. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pongrácz P, Molnár C, Miklósi Á (2006) Acoustic parameters of dog barks carry emotional information for humans. Appl Anim Behav Sci 100:228–240. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2005.12.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Pongrácz P, Molnár C, Miklósi Á (2010) Barking in family dogs: an ethological approach. Vet J 183:141–147. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.12.010

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Range F, Virányi Z (2011) Development of gaze following abilities in wolves (Canis lupus). PLoS One 6:e16888. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016888

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reby D, Charlton BD (2011) Attention grabbing in red deer sexual calls. Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-011-0451-0

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reby D, McComb K (2003) Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Anim Behav 65:519–530. doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2078

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendall D, Rodman PS, Emond RE (1996) Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Anim Behav 51:1007–1015. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0103

    Google Scholar 

  • Riede T, Fitch WT (1999) Vocal tract length and acoustics of vocalization in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). J Exp Biol 202:2859–2867

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins RL (2000) Vocal communication in free-ranging African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). Behaviour 137:1271–1298

    Google Scholar 

  • Schassburger RM (1993) Vocal communication in the timber wolf, Canis lupus, Linnaeus: structure, motivation, and ontogeny. Adv Ethol 30:1–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenkel R (1967) Submission: its features and function in the wolf and dog. Integr Comp Biol 7:319–329. doi:10.1093/icb/7.2.319

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JP, Fuller JL (1965) Genetics and the social behavior of the dog. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple S, McComb K (2000) Perception of female reproductive state from vocal cues in a mammal species. Proc R Soc B 267:707–712. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1060

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter EI, Berlin ER, Bower JT, Blumstein DT (2013) A test of the nonlinearity hypothesis in great-tailed grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus). Ethology 119(4):309–315. doi:10.1111/eth.12066

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AM, Reby D (2010) The contribution of source-filter theory to mammal vocal communication research. J Zool 280:221–236. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00661.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AM, Reby D, McComb K (2008) Human listeners attend to size information in domestic dog growls. J Acoust Soc Am 123:2903–2909. doi:10.1121/1.2896962

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AM, Reby D, McComb K (2010a) Why do large dogs sound more aggressive to human listeners: acoustic bases of motivational misattributions. Ethology 116:1155–1162. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01829.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AM, Reby D, McComb K (2010b) Size communication in domestic dog, Canis familiaris, growls. Anim Behav 79:205–210. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.030

    Google Scholar 

  • Tembrock G (1976) Canid vocalizations. Behav Process 1:57–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Titze IR (1994) Principles of voice production. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooze ZJ, Harrington FH, Fentress JC (1990) Individually distinct vocalizations in timber wolves, Canis lupus. Anim Behav 40:723–730. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80701-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend SW, Manser MB (2011) The function of nonlinear phenomena in meerkat alarm calls. Biol Lett 7:47–49. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0537

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Truax B (2001) Acoustic communication. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2009) What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs’ sensitivity to human actions. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 85:327–345. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00104.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Utrata E, Virányi Z, Range F (2012) Quantity discrimination in wolves (Canis lupus). Front Psychol 3:1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00505

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hooff JARAM, Wensing JAB (1987) Dominance and its behavioral measures in a captive wolf pack. In: Frank H (ed) Man and wolf: advances, issues, and problems in captive wolf research. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 219–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Virányi Z, Range F (submitted) Wolves understanding of human communicative cues in a two choice task

    Google Scholar 

  • Virányi Z, Gácsi M, Kubinyi E et al (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 11:373–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volodina EV, Volodin IA, Filatova OA (2006) The occurrence of nonlinear vocal phenomena in frustration whines of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Adv Bioacoust 2(47):245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilden I, Herzel H, Peters G, Tembrock G (1998) Subharmonics, biphonation, and deterministic chaos in mammal vocalization. Bioacoustics 9:171–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyman MT, Mooring MS, McCowan B et al (2012) Acoustic cues to size and quality in the vocalizations of male North American bison, Bison bison. Anim Behav 84(6):1381–1391. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.037

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin S (2002) A new perspective on barking in dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 116:189–193. doi:10.1037//0735-7036.116.2.189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yin S, McCowan B (2004) Barking in domestic dogs: context specificity and individual identification. Anim Behav 68:343–355. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.07.016

    Google Scholar 

  • Yumoto E, Gould WJ, Baer T (1982) Harmonics-to-noise ratio as an index of the degree of hoarseness. J Acoust Soc Am 71:1544–1550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaroni M, Passilongo D, Buccianti A et al (2012) Group specific vocal signature in free-ranging wolf packs. Ethol Ecol Evol 24:322–331. doi:10.1080/03949370.2012.664569

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimen E (1982) A wolf pack sociogram. In: Wolves of the world. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Writing this chapter was supported by ERC Starting Grant CanCoop (311870) and Austrian Science Fund (FWF) project P21244-B17 to the last author. Tamás Faragó was supported by The Hungarian Academy of Sciences (F01/031). Simon Townsend was funded by the University of Zurich.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Pázmány Péter stny 1/C, H-1117, Budapest, Hungary

    Tamás Faragó

  2. Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210, Vienna, Austria

    Tamás Faragó & Friederike Range

  3. Animal Behaviour, Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zürich, Switzerland

    Simon Townsend

  4. Wolf Science Center, Ernstbrunn, Austria

    Friederike Range

Authors
  1. Tamás Faragó
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon Townsend
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Friederike Range
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamás Faragó .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Telos - Philosophische Praxis, Bürmoos, Austria

    Guenther Witzany

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Faragó, T., Townsend, S., Range, F. (2014). The Information Content of Wolf (and Dog) Social Communication. In: Witzany, G. (eds) Biocommunication of Animals. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7414-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation