Abstract
Current knowledge indicates communicative interactions within and between organisms in all domains, i.e. bacteria, protozoa, animals, fungi and plants as essential. Communicative interactions are necessary within organisms – intraorganismic – to coordinate cell-cell interactions, similar to tissues and organs especially in complex bodies. Interorganismic communication we find in all signal mediated interactions between species and related species (species-specific). If species communicate with non-members or in the case of symbiotic interactions we term them transorganismic communication. Throughout all kingdoms of life we do not find any coordination and organization that does not depend on communication. In contrast to biocommunication of bacteria, fungi, plants and viruses communicative interactions between animals show signs that depend on vocal and visible expression patterns. This means although also animals depend in most cases on volatile substances such as pheromones to identify group identity of self and non-self a variety of signs transport meaning via tactile behavior, vocal sounds and visual gestures. This opens a variety of combinatory possibilities and broaden the communicative competencies and its complexity exponentially in comparism to biocommunication of bacteria, fungi and plants.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Baluska F, Witzany G (2013) At the dawn of a new revolution in life sciences. World J Biol Chem 4:13–15
Villarreal LP, Witzany G (2010) Viruses are essential agents within the roots and stem of the tree of life. J Theor Biol 262(4):698–710
Witzany G (1993) Natur der Sprache – Sprache der Natur. Sprachpragmatische Philosophie der Biologie. Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg
Witzany G (1995) From the “logic of the molecular syntax” to molecular pragmatism. Explanatory deficits in Manfred Eigen’s concept of language and communication. Evol Cogn 1:148–168
Witzany G (2000) Life: the communicative structure. BoD, Norderstedt
Witzany G (ed) (2009) Natural genetic engineering and natural genome editing. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1178
Witzany G (2010) Biocommunication and natural genome editing. Springer, Dordrecht
Witzany G (ed) (2011a) Biocommunication in soil microorganisms. Springer, Berlin
Witzany G (2011b) Can mathematics explain the evolution of human language? Commun Integr Biol 4(5):516–520
Witzany G (ed) (2012) Biocommunication of fungi. Springer, Dordrecht
Witzany G, Baluska F (eds) (2012a) Biocommunication of plants. Springer, Heidelberg
Witzany G, Baluska F (2012b) Life’s code script doesn’t code itself. The machine metaphor for living organisms is outdated. EMBO Rep 13:1054–1056
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Witzany, G. (2014). Why Biocommunication of Animals?. In: Witzany, G. (eds) Biocommunication of Animals. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7414-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7414-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7413-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7414-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)