Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Economic Stress, Human Capital, and Families in Asia pp 105–127Cite as

Economic Insecurity and Husband-to-Wife Physical Assault in Hong Kong: The Role of Husband’s Power Motive

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Quality of Life in Asia ((QLAS,volume 4))

Abstract

Previous research demonstrates that the risk, severity, and frequency of domestic violence vary considerably across social classes. Some studies show that couples from the lower class are more likely to experience husband-to-wife violence. Prior theoretical discussions have postulated that the relationship between husband’s economic resources and husband-to-wife physical assault is explained by husband’s attempt to gain and maintain power in the relationship. However, the mediating role of husband’s power motive is seldom empirically examined. The relationship between husband’s economic resources and husband-to-wife physical assault and its mediating mechanism are not entirely clear, especially in the Chinese context.

Using couple-level data from a household survey in Hong Kong (N = 871), the current study shows that the husband’s desire to have more power in the relationship is significantly and positively associated with husband-to-wife physical assault, controlling for other relevant covariates. Meanwhile, husband’s power motive is a function of his economic insecurity. Mediation analysis shows that a couple’s income difference, the husband’s full-time employment status, and his financial stress exert significant indirect effects on the risk of violence through the husband’s power motive. Our findings are consistent with the hypotheses derived from the resource theories. Recent economic changes in Asia, which have led to rising income inequality, emerging poverty, and structural unemployment, may have played an important role in shaping family dynamics in Hong Kong. Our study calls for special attention to the increased risk of domestic violence in times of economic downturn and restructuring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, K. L. (1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 655–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M. P., Greenstein, T. N., & Lang, M. M. (2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1137–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Waltz, J., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patters, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. L., Fox, G. L., DeMaris, A., & van Wyk, J. (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage, individual economic distress and violence against women in intimate relationships. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 207–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359, 1331–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. L. (2005). Study on child abuse and spouse battering: Report on findings of household survey. Hong Kong: Department of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F. M., Lai, B. L., Au, K. C., & Ngai, S. S. Y. (1997). Gender role identity, stereotypes, and attitudes in Hong Kong. In F. M. Cheung (Ed.), Engendering Hong Kong society (pp. 201–236). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, S. W. K., & Lui, T. L. (2004). Testing the global city-social polarization thesis: Hong Kong since 1990s. Urban Studies, 41, 1863–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. Y. P., & Ting, K. F. (2008). Wife beating in South Africa: An imbalance theory of resources and power. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 834–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. Y. P., Au, W. T., Wong, W., Liong, C. C. M., Wong, F.Y., Lo, S. K. W., & Chao, K. C. (2012a). Exploratory study on gender stereotyping and its impacts on male gender (Research Report). Hong Kong: Equal Opportunities Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. Y. P., Cheung, Y. W., & Cheung, A. K. L. (2012b). Social isolation and spousal violence: Comparing female marriage migrants with local women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 444–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, N., & Lum, T. (2008). Trends in family attitudes and values in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D. H., & Straus, M. A. (1986). Marital power, conflict and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples. Violence and Victims, 1, 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, R. K., Stith, S. M., & Bender, M. M. (1990). Sex role egalitarianism and marital violence. Sex Roles, 22, 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubbins, L. A., & Vannoy, D. (2005). Socioeconomic resources, gender traditionalism, and wife abuse in urban Russian couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunradi, C. B., Caetano, R., Clark, C., & Schafer, J. (2000). Neighborhood poverty as a predictor of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States: A multilevel analysis. Annals of Epidemiology, 10, 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMaris, A. (2000). Till discord do us part: The role of physical and verbal conflict in union disruption. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 683–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMaris, A., Benson, M. L., Fox, G. L., Hill, T., & van Wyk, J. (2003). Distal and proximal factors in domestic violence: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 652–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., & Strachan, C. E. (1987). Motivation needs for power and spouse-specific assertiveness in assaultive and nonassaultive men. Violence and Victims, 2, 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, M., Jansen, H., Heise, L., Watts, C. H., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2008). Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: An observational study. The Lancet, 371, 1165–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, J., Kershaw, K. L., & Shannon, F. T. (1986). Factors associated with reports of wife assault in New Zealand. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 407–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, G. L., & Chancey, D. (1998). Sources of economic distress: Individual and family outcomes. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 725–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, G. L., Benson, M. L., DeMaris, A., & van Wyk, J. (2002). Economic distress and intimate violence: Testing family stress and resources theories. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 793–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368, 1260–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J. (1974). The violent home. Beverley Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1971). Force and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and Family, 33, 624–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haj-Yahia, M. (2000). The incidence of wife abuse and battering and some sociodemographic correlates as revealed by two national surveys in Palestinian society. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 347–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J., Firestone, J. M., & Vega, W. A. (2005). The interaction of country of origin, acculturation, and gender role ideology on wife abuse. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindin, M. J., & Adair, L. S. (2002). Who’s at risk? Factors associated with intimate partner violence in the Philippines. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1385–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, K. L., Demo, D. H., & Edwards, J. N. (1994). Physical wife abuse in a non-western society: An integrated theoretical approach. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. (2007). Women and men in Hong Kong: Key statistics 2007. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, C. A., McCullough, B. C., & Sugimoto, T. (1981). Status relationship in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 675–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotaling, G. T., & Sugarman, D. B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims, 1, 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, R. (2002). Intimate partner violence: Causes and prevention. The Lancet, 359, 1423–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, R., Levin, J., & Penn-Kekana, L. (2002). Risk factors for domestic violence: Findings from a South African cross-sectional study. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1603–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaukinen, C. (2004). Status compatibility, physical violence, and emotional abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 452–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, R. L. (1995). Power versus feminist theories of wife abuse. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 305–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., & Chan, C. (1999). Enduring violence and staying in marriage: Stories of battered women in rural china. Violence Against Women, 5, 1469–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheet, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variables effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, R., & Gartner, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 947–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, A., & Blankenship, V. (1987). Power and affiliation motivation, stress, and abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, L. A. (1996). Socioeconomic and coercive power within the family. Gender & Society, 10, 449–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mood, C. (2009). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parish, W. L., Wang, T., Laumann, E. O., Pan, S., & Luo, Y. (2004). Intimate partner violence in China: National prevalence, risk factors and associated health problems. International Family Planning Perspectives, 30, 174–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, H. (1972). Marital power and the theory of resources in cultural context. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 3, 50–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagrestano, L. M., Heavey, C. L., & Christensen, A. (1999). Perceived power and physical violence in marital conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salari, S. M., & Baldwin, B. M. (2002). Verbal, physical, and injurious aggression among intimate couples over time. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 523–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, J. A., Feldbau-Kohn, S., Slep, A. M. S., & Heyman, R. E. (2001). Risk factors for male-to-female partner physical abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 281–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. D. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. D. (1994). Enhancing the quality of survey data on violence against women: A feminist approach. Gender & Society, 8, 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B., & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 65–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1995). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed door: Violence in the American family. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. L. (2005). Culture, divorce, and family mediation in Hong Kong. Family Court Review, 43, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szinovacz, M. E., & Egley, L. C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 995–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, P. F. (2012). Gender matters in social polarization: Comparing Singapore, Hong Kong and Taipei. Urban Studies. http://usj.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/10/01/0042098012460734.abstract?rss=1. Accessed 5 Nov 2012. doi: 10.1177/0042098012460734

  • Tam, S. Y., & Tang, C. S. K. (2005). Comparing wife abuse perceptions between Chinese police officers and social workers. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. K. (1999a). Wife abuse in Hong Kong Chinese families: A community survey. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. K. (1999b). Marital power and aggression in a community sample of Hong Kong Chinese families. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 586–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. K., & Lai, B. P. Y. (2008). A review of empirical literature on the prevalence and risk markers of male-on-female intimate partner violence in contemporary China, 1987–2006. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. K., Cheung, F. M. C., Chen, R., & Sun, X. (2002a). Definition of violence against women: A comparative study in Chinese societies of Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 671–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S. K., Wong, D., & Cheung, F. M. C. (2002b). Social construction of women as legitimate victims of violence in Chinese societies. Violence Against Women, 8, 968–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Websdale, N. (2010). Familicidal hearts: The emotional styles for 211 killers. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2008). World development indicator. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Full report. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., Zhu, F., O’Campo, P., Koenig, M. A., Mock, V., & Campbell, J. (2005). Prevalence of and risk factors for intimate partner violence in China. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yllo, K. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47–62). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yount, K. M. (2005). Resources, family organization, and domestic violence against married women in Minya, Egypt. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 579–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yount, K. M., & Carrera, J. S. (2006). Domestic violence against married women in Cambodia. Social Forces, 85, 355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yount, K. M., & Li, L. (2010). Domestic violence against married women in Egypt. Sex Roles, 63, 332–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Adam K. L. Cheung

  2. Department of Sociology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong

    Susanne Y. P. Choi

Authors
  1. Adam K. L. Cheung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susanne Y. P. Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam K. L. Cheung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology & Asia Research, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Wei-Jun Jean Yeung

  2. Institute of Policy Studies, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Mui Teng Yap

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cheung, A.K.L., Choi, S.Y.P. (2013). Economic Insecurity and Husband-to-Wife Physical Assault in Hong Kong: The Role of Husband’s Power Motive. In: Yeung, WJ., Yap, M. (eds) Economic Stress, Human Capital, and Families in Asia. Quality of Life in Asia, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7386-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation