Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The 1997 Economic Crisis, Changes in the Pattern of Achieved Fertility and Ideal Number of Children in Korea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Stress, Human Capital, and Families in Asia

Part of the book series: Quality of Life in Asia ((QLAS,volume 4))

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to explore the effects of the 1997 Asian economic crisis on the level of achieved and desired fertility and on the pattern of socioeconomic differentials. This chapter explores recent changes in the level of fertility and ideal number of children (INC) according to socioeconomic status of the couple. This study focuses on a comparative analysis of children ever born (CEB), the post-1998 CEB and INC of married women. For the second round of comparative analysis, the study population is split into two groups: those married before 1997 and those married for the first time in 1997 or thereafter. The level of CEB and INC as well as the pattern of socioeconomic differentials of the two groups are then compared.

The main data set used for the analysis is from the 2006 Korean National Fertility, Family Health and Welfare Survey. Results reveal that the economic crisis has significantly affected the causal mechanisms of Korean fertility. CEB and the post-1998 CEB show contrasting patterns according to socioeconomic status of the couple. In the context of ultra-low fertility after the economic crisis, the relationship between socioeconomic status and the level of fertility is found to be positive. For the highest socioeconomic group, however, the level of recent fertility tends to decrease slightly as socioeconomic status rises. The level of INC does not show contrasting patterns according to mother’s education or husband’s occupation. It is found that the economic crisis has not changed the level and pattern of socioeconomic differentials in INC significantly. The gap between achieved and desired fertility turns out to be widest among those with the lowest socioeconomic status and narrowest among those with middle or upper-middle status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to results from the 2010 census, the proportion of population (aged 30 or higher) with middle school education or lower was estimated as 23.9 % and those with high school education, 37.3 % (Statistics Korea 2011).

  2. 2.

    For detailed discussion on this technique of transformation and its applications, see Kim D. S. (1987: 154–159).

  3. 3.

    It should be noted that the proportion of those with middle school education and below is very small among those married in or after 1997. It was found, however, that a series of tests of statistical significance support this argument.

References

  • Andorka, R. (1978). Determinants of fertility in advanced societies. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In National Bureau of Economic Research (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–231). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, G. G., & Weininger, A. (1973). Economic determinants of fertility: Results from cross-sectional aggregate data. Demography, 10(2), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, L. J., Arnold, F., & Kwon, T. H. (1982). The determinants of fertility in the Republic of Korea (National Research Council, Report No. 14. Committee on Population and Demography). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choe, M. K., & Retherford, R. D. (2009). The contribution of education to South Korea’s fertility decline to “lowest-low” level. Asian Population Studies, 5(3), 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, B. M., Palmore, J. A., Lee, S., & Lee, S. J. (1972). Psychological perspective: Family planning in Korea. Seoul: Hollym Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, S. H. (1979). Fertility and education: What do we really know? Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1969). Towards a socioeconomic theory of fertility: A survey of recent research on economic factors in American fertility. In S. J. Behrman, L. Corsa Jr., & R. Freedman (Eds.), Fertility and family planning: A world view (pp. 127–156). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1975). An economic framework for fertility analysis. Studies in Family Planning, 6(3), 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eun, K. S. (2003). Understanding recent fertility decline in Korea. Journal of Population and Social Security, Supplement to Volume 1. Tokyo: National Institute of Population and Social Security. Research. http://www.ipss.go.jp/index-e.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2010.

  • Freedman, D. (1963). The relation of economic status to fertility. American Economic Review, 53(3), 414–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R., Coombs, L., Chang, M., & Sun, T. H. (1974). Trends in fertility, family size preferences and practices of family planning: Taiwan, 1965–73. Studies in Family Planning, 5(9), 270–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KIHASA. (1982, 1988, 1994, 2000, 2009). The Korean national fertility survey. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. S. (1987). Socioeconomic status, inequality and fertility. Seoul: Population and Development Studies Center, Seoul National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. S. (2005). Theoretical explanations of rapid fertility decline in Korea. The Japanese Journal of Population, 3, 2–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. S. (2007). The “IMF economic crisis” and changes in Korean fertility (in Korean). Seoul: Jipmoon dang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. S. (2009). The 1997 Asian economic crisis and changes in the pattern of socioeconomic differentials in Korean fertility. In G. Jones, P. Tay Straughan, & A. Chan (Eds.), Ultra-low fertility in Pacific Asia: Trends, causes and policy issues (pp. 110–131). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, I. K. (1987). Socioeconomic development and fertility behavior in Korea. Seoul: Population and Development Studies Center, Seoul National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. I., Rider, R. V., Harper, P. A., & Yang, J. M. (1974). Age at marriage, fertility planning practices, and other variables as correlates of fertility in Korea. Demography, 11(4), 641–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. H., Lee, S. S., & Kim, D. H. (2006). Fertility differentials by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: Analysis of Korean population census data (in Korean). Korea Journal of Population Studies, 29(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, T. H. (1982). Differentials in Korean fertility. In Y. Chang et al. (Eds.), Society in transition: With special reference to Korea, essays in memory of Har Young Lee. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1957). Economic backwardness and economic growth. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1975). The economic theory of fertility decline. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1977). Beyond economic man: Economics, politics and the population problem. Population and Development Review, 3(3), 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1981). Economic decision theory and human fertility behavior: A speculative essay. Population and Development Review, 7(3), 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1963). Market prices, opportunity costs and income effects. In C. Christ (Ed.), Measurement in economics: Studies in mathematical economics and econometrics in memory of Yehuda Grunfeld. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, E. (1972). Economic motives for family limitation. Population Studies, 24(3), 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, E., & Short, K. (1983). Effects of income and wealth on the demand for children. In R. A. Bulatao & R. D. Lee (Eds.), Determinants of fertility in developing countries, Vol. 1: Supply and demand for children (pp. 590–642). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namboodiri, N. K. (1970). On the relation between economic status and family size preferences when status differentials in contraceptive instrumentalities are eliminated. Population Studies, 24(2), 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Population Reference Bureau. (2009). 2009 World population data sheet. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Jr., Speare, M. C., & Lin, H. S. (1973). Urbanization, non-familial work, education and fertility in Taiwan. Population Studies, 27(2), 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Korea. (2011). Korea statistical information system (KOSIS). On-line Government Statistics Database. Daejeon: Statistics Korea. http://kosis.kr/index.jsp/. Accessed 28 Oct 2011.

  • United Nations. (2011). World population prospects: The 2009 revision. Population database, United Nations Population Division. New York: United Nations. http://esa.un.org/wup2009/unup/index.asp?panel=1. Accessed 28 Oct 2011.

  • Willis, R. J. (1973). A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), S14–S64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, D. H. (1958). Trends in class fertility in western nations. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 24(2), 216–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaukey, D. (1963). Some immediate determinants of fertility differences in Lebanon. Marriage and Family Living, 25(Feb), 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S. H. (2006). On regional fertility differentials: understanding the causal mechanisms of low fertility in Korea (in Korean). Population and Society, 2(2), 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea

    Doo-Sub Kim

Authors
  1. Doo-Sub Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doo-Sub Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology & Asia Research, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Wei-Jun Jean Yeung

  2. Institute of Policy Studies, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Mui Teng Yap

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, DS. (2013). The 1997 Economic Crisis, Changes in the Pattern of Achieved Fertility and Ideal Number of Children in Korea. In: Yeung, WJ., Yap, M. (eds) Economic Stress, Human Capital, and Families in Asia. Quality of Life in Asia, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7386-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation