Abstract
The research reported in this chapter examined the development of strategies in learning to read Chinese through three experiments that involved more than 300 children from preschool to grade six. Experiment 1 showed that preschoolers relied on a few distinctive visual features to read their first words. Experiment 2 showed that kindergarteners already developed some understanding of the phonetic strategy and the analogy strategy, although second graders used both strategies more effectively than kindergartners. The phonetic strategy refers to reading a phonetic compound character by using the information in the phonetic. The analogy strategy refers to reading a compound by making an analogy to another compound that shares the same phonetic. Another finding of Study Two was that the phonetic strategy and analogy strategy developed simultaneously. Experiment 3 revealed that children in the fourth and sixth grade used consistency information to learn families of characters sharing the same phonetic. They learned characters in consistent families better than semi-consistent families, followed by inconsistent families. Moreover, children took family consistency information into consideration when they pronounced novel characters. A model of Chinese reading development is proposed based on the results of the three experiments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, R. C., Li, W., Ku, Y.-M., Shu, H., & Wu, N. (2003). Use of partial information in learning to read Chinese characters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 52–57.
Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386–393.
Bastien-Toniazzo, M., & Jullien, S. (2001). Nature and importance of the logographic phase in learning to read. Reading and Writing, 14, 119–143.
Bowey, J. A., Vaughan, L., & Hansen, J. (1998). Beginning readers’ use of orthographic analogies in word reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 108–133.
Cardoso-Martins, C., Resende, S. M., & Rodrigues, L. A. (2002). Letter name knowledge and the ability to learn to read by processing letter-phoneme relations in words: Evidence from Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 15, 409–432.
Carnine, D. W. (1977). Phonics versus look-say: Transfer to new words. Reading Teacher, 30, 636–640.
Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chan, C. K. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Phonological processing in reading Chinese among normally achieving and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 23–43.
Clay, M. M. (2002). An observation survey. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
De Abreu, M. D., & Cardoso-Martins, C. (1998). Alphabetic access route in beginning reading acquisition in Portuguese: The role of letter-name knowledge. Reading and Writing, 10, 85–104.
Ehri, L. C. (1985). Effects of printed language acquisition on speech. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 333–367). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 5–31.
Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 383–417). New York: Longman.
Ehri, L. C., & Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 12–26.
Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163–179.
Fox, B., & Routh, K. D. (1984). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word-attack skills: Revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1059–1064.
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–330). London: Erlbaum.
Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674–691.
Goswami, U. (1986). Children’s use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73–83.
Goswami, U. (1988). Orthographic analogies and reading development. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 239–268.
Goswami, U. (1990a). A special link between rhyming skill and the use of orthographic analogies by beginning readers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 301–311.
Goswami, U. (1990b). Phonological priming and orthographic analogies in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 323–340.
Goswami, U. (1993). Toward an interactive analogy model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 443–475.
Gough, P. B., & Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179–196.
Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35–48). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
He, Y., Wang, Q., & Anderson, R. C. (2005). Chinese children’s use of subcharacter information about pronunciation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 572–579.
Ho, C. S.-H., & Bryant, P. (1997a). Learning to read Chinese beyond the logographic phase. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 276–289.
Ho, C. S.-H., & Bryant, P. (1997b). Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese. Developmental Psychology, 33, 946–951.
Ho, C. S.-H., Wong, W.-L., & Chan, W.-S. (1999). The use of orthographic analogies in learning to read Chinese. Journal of Child Psychology, 40, 393–403.
Hoien, T., & Lundberg, I. (1988). Stages of word recognition in early reading development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 32, 163–182.
Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505–529.
Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1985). Reading and spelling strategies of first-grade children. In J. A. Niles & R. Lalik (Eds.), Issues in literacy: A research perspective (pp. 306–309). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
Marsh, G., Desberg, P., & Cooper, J. (1977). Developmental strategies in reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 9, 391–394.
Marsh, G., Friedman, M. P., Desberg, P., & Saterdahl, K. (1981). Comparison of reading and spelling strategies in normal and reading disabled children. In M. P. Friedman, J. P. Das, & N. O’Connor (Eds.), Intelligence and reading (pp. 363–367). New York: Plenum Press.
Mason, J. M. (1980). When do children begin to read: An exploration of four-year-old children’s letter- and word-reading competencies. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 203–227.
Nation, K., Allen, R., & Hulme, C. (2001). The limitations of orthographic analogy in early reading development: Performance on the clue-word task depends on phonological priming and elementary decoding skill, not the use of orthographic analogy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 75–94.
Scott, J. A., & Ehri, L. C. (1990). Sight word reading in prereaders: Use of logographic vs. alphabetic access routes. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 149–166.
Shu, H., Anderson, R. C., & Wu, N. (2000). Phonetic awareness: Knowledge of orthography-phonology relationships in the character acquisition of Chinese children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 56–62.
Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74, 27–47.
Shu, H., Zhou, X., & Wu, N. (2000). Utilizing phonological cues in Chinese characters: A developmental study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32, 164–169.
Siok, W. T., & Fletcher, P. (2001). The role of phonological awareness and visual-orthographic skills in Chinese reading acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 37, 886–899.
Tzeng, O. J. L., Lin, Z. H., Hung, D. L., & Lee, W. L. (1995). Learning to be a conspirator: A tale of becoming a good Chinese reader. In B. de Gelder & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wang, X., & Tao, B. (1993). 小学生识字量测试题库及评价量表 [The written vocabulary test for primary school students and norm]. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
Wimmer, H., & Hummer, P. (1990). How German-speaking first graders read and spell: Doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349–368.
Wu, X., & Anderson, R. C. (2007). Reading strategies revealed in Chinese children’s oral reading. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 12, 47–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Stimuli in the Character Naming Task in Experiment Two
Group | Clue character | Test character |
---|---|---|
Group One | 胥, 阑, 鬲, 旬 | 湑, 揟, 谰, 镧, 隔, 滆, 徇, 恂 |
榗, 唳, 熐, 潭 | 缙, 溍, 悷, 捩, 猽, 慏, 撢, 谭 | |
Group Two | 晋, 戾, 冥, 覃 | 缙, 溍, 悷, 捩, 猽, 慏, 撢, 谭 |
谞, 澜, 镉, 洵 | 湑, 揟, 谰, 镧, 隔, 滆, 徇, 恂 |
Appendix 2: Stimuli in the Character Learning and Transfer Task in Experiment Three
Type of family | |||
---|---|---|---|
Task | Consistent | Semi-consistent | Inconsistent |
Learning task | 冥, 榠, 熐 | 肴, 崤, 淆 | 妥, 馁, 绥 |
ming2, ming2, ming2 | yao2, xiao2, xiao2 | tuo3, nei3, sui2 | |
邑, 悒, 浥 | 弇, 媕, 啽 | 翏, 憀, 缪 | |
yi4, yi4, yi4 | yan3, an1, an1 | liu2, liao2, mou2 | |
Transfer task | 慏, 猽, 鄍 | 誵, 倄, 殽 | 挼, 浽, 荽 |
俋, 挹, 邕 | 揜, 渰, 葊 | 镠, 漻, 戮 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, X., Anderson, R.C., Li, H., Shu, H. (2014). Visual, Phonological and Orthographic Strategies in Learning to Read Chinese. In: Chen, X., Wang, Q., Luo, Y. (eds) Reading Development and Difficulties in Monolingual and Bilingual Chinese Children. Literacy Studies, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7380-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7380-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7379-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7380-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)