Visual, Phonological and Orthographic Strategies in Learning to Read Chinese

  • Xi ChenEmail author
  • Richard C. Anderson
  • Hong Li
  • Hua Shu
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 8)


The research reported in this chapter examined the development of strategies in learning to read Chinese through three experiments that involved more than 300 children from preschool to grade six. Experiment 1 showed that preschoolers relied on a few distinctive visual features to read their first words. Experiment 2 showed that kindergarteners already developed some understanding of the phonetic strategy and the analogy strategy, although second graders used both strategies more effectively than kindergartners. The phonetic strategy refers to reading a phonetic compound character by using the information in the phonetic. The analogy strategy refers to reading a compound by making an analogy to another compound that shares the same phonetic. Another finding of Study Two was that the phonetic strategy and analogy strategy developed simultaneously. Experiment 3 revealed that children in the fourth and sixth grade used consistency information to learn families of characters sharing the same phonetic. They learned characters in consistent families better than semi-consistent families, followed by inconsistent families. Moreover, children took family consistency information into consideration when they pronounced novel characters. A model of Chinese reading development is proposed based on the results of the three experiments.


Learning to read Chinese Distinctive visual feature Phonetic strategy Analogy strategy Family consistency 


  1. Anderson, R. C., Li, W., Ku, Y.-M., Shu, H., & Wu, N. (2003). Use of partial information in learning to read Chinese characters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastien-Toniazzo, M., & Jullien, S. (2001). Nature and importance of the logographic phase in learning to read. Reading and Writing, 14, 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowey, J. A., Vaughan, L., & Hansen, J. (1998). Beginning readers’ use of orthographic analogies in word reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 108–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cardoso-Martins, C., Resende, S. M., & Rodrigues, L. A. (2002). Letter name knowledge and the ability to learn to read by processing letter-phoneme relations in words: Evidence from Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 15, 409–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carnine, D. W. (1977). Phonics versus look-say: Transfer to new words. Reading Teacher, 30, 636–640.Google Scholar
  7. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, C. K. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Phonological processing in reading Chinese among normally achieving and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clay, M. M. (2002). An observation survey. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  10. De Abreu, M. D., & Cardoso-Martins, C. (1998). Alphabetic access route in beginning reading acquisition in Portuguese: The role of letter-name knowledge. Reading and Writing, 10, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehri, L. C. (1985). Effects of printed language acquisition on speech. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 333–367). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 5–31.Google Scholar
  13. Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 383–417). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Ehri, L. C., & Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 12–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fox, B., & Routh, K. D. (1984). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word-attack skills: Revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1059–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–330). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goswami, U. (1986). Children’s use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goswami, U. (1988). Orthographic analogies and reading development. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 239–268.Google Scholar
  21. Goswami, U. (1990a). A special link between rhyming skill and the use of orthographic analogies by beginning readers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goswami, U. (1990b). Phonological priming and orthographic analogies in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goswami, U. (1993). Toward an interactive analogy model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 443–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gough, P. B., & Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35–48). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. He, Y., Wang, Q., & Anderson, R. C. (2005). Chinese children’s use of subcharacter information about pronunciation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 572–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ho, C. S.-H., & Bryant, P. (1997a). Learning to read Chinese beyond the logographic phase. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 276–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ho, C. S.-H., & Bryant, P. (1997b). Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese. Developmental Psychology, 33, 946–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ho, C. S.-H., Wong, W.-L., & Chan, W.-S. (1999). The use of orthographic analogies in learning to read Chinese. Journal of Child Psychology, 40, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoien, T., & Lundberg, I. (1988). Stages of word recognition in early reading development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 32, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1985). Reading and spelling strategies of first-grade children. In J. A. Niles & R. Lalik (Eds.), Issues in literacy: A research perspective (pp. 306–309). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
  33. Marsh, G., Desberg, P., & Cooper, J. (1977). Developmental strategies in reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 9, 391–394.Google Scholar
  34. Marsh, G., Friedman, M. P., Desberg, P., & Saterdahl, K. (1981). Comparison of reading and spelling strategies in normal and reading disabled children. In M. P. Friedman, J. P. Das, & N. O’Connor (Eds.), Intelligence and reading (pp. 363–367). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mason, J. M. (1980). When do children begin to read: An exploration of four-year-old children’s letter- and word-reading competencies. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nation, K., Allen, R., & Hulme, C. (2001). The limitations of orthographic analogy in early reading development: Performance on the clue-word task depends on phonological priming and elementary decoding skill, not the use of orthographic analogy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scott, J. A., & Ehri, L. C. (1990). Sight word reading in prereaders: Use of logographic vs. alphabetic access routes. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 149–166.Google Scholar
  38. Shu, H., Anderson, R. C., & Wu, N. (2000). Phonetic awareness: Knowledge of orthography-phonology relationships in the character acquisition of Chinese children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shu, H., Zhou, X., & Wu, N. (2000). Utilizing phonological cues in Chinese characters: A developmental study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32, 164–169.Google Scholar
  41. Siok, W. T., & Fletcher, P. (2001). The role of phonological awareness and visual-orthographic skills in Chinese reading acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 37, 886–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tzeng, O. J. L., Lin, Z. H., Hung, D. L., & Lee, W. L. (1995). Learning to be a conspirator: A tale of becoming a good Chinese reader. In B. de Gelder & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Wang, X., & Tao, B. (1993). 小学生识字量测试题库及评价量表 [The written vocabulary test for primary school students and norm]. 上海: 上海教育出版社.Google Scholar
  44. Wimmer, H., & Hummer, P. (1990). How German-speaking first graders read and spell: Doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wu, X., & Anderson, R. C. (2007). Reading strategies revealed in Chinese children’s oral reading. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 12, 47–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xi Chen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard C. Anderson
    • 2
  • Hong Li
    • 3
  • Hua Shu
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Applied Psychology and Human DevelopmentOISE/University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  3. 3.School of PsychologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  4. 4.State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and LearningBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations