Abstract
Advance planning for people with mental illness involves allowing competent individuals to specify their treatment preferences in advance of future incapacity. Supporters of advance planning argue that it can enhance autonomy and allow people to participate in their future treatment decisions, allowing patients and clinicians to engage in a constructive approach to treatment planning, while opponents claim that advance directives are problematic both legally and ethically and not workable in practice. To argue that advance directives are useful in psychiatry means being clear about what they are intended to achieve and thus what outcome measures might be appropriate. Outcome measures may best be suggested by both the type of advance directive involved and the philosophy behind it. Autonomy and empowerment, for example, would be best assessed by asking patients whether having the plan had made them feel more involved or in control when detained or admitted. Where compulsory detention or treatment is needed, questions arise as to how to balance a patient’s right to autonomy and self-determination with a physician’s duty of care. There is undoubtedly an inherent conflict and a balance to be struck between the two. The main issues that arise relate to the capacity of an individual to make an advance directive, when a directive is written and what it actually contains.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agnetti, G. 2008. The consumer movement and compulsory treatment: A professional outlook. International Journal of Mental Health 37(4): 33–45.
Atkinson, J.M. 2007. Advance directives in psychiatry: Theory, practice and ethics. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Atkinson, J.M., and H.C. Garner. 2003. Advance directives in mental health. Psychiatric Bulletin 27: 437.
Atkinson, J.M., H.C. Garner, and W. Harper Gilmour. 2004. Models of advance directives in mental health care: Stakeholder views. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 39(8): 673–680.
Backlar, P., B.H. McFarland, J.W. Swanson, and J. Mahler. 2001. Consumer, provider, and informal caregiver opinions on psychiatric advance directives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 28: 427–441.
Halpern, A., and G. Szmukler. 1997. Psychiatric advance directives: Reconciling autonomy and non-consensual treatment. The Psychiatrist 21: 323–327.
La Fond, J., and D. Srebnik. 2002. The impact of mental health advance directives on patient perceptions of coercion in civil commitment and treatment decisions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 25(6): 537–555.
Morrissey, F. 2010. Advance directives in mental health care: Hearing the voice of the mentally ill. Medico Legal Journal of Ireland 16(1): 21.
O’Reilly, R., J. Grey, and S. State. 2009. An exchange of views on what constitutes reasonable review of treatment capacity. Research Insights 6(2): 1–14.
Papageorgiou, A., M. King, A. Janmohamed, O. Davidson, and J. Dawson. 2002. Advance directives for patients compulsorily admitted to hospital with serious mental illness: Randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry 181: 513–519.
Papageorgiou, A., A. Janmohamed, M. King, O. Davidson, and J. Dawson. 2004. Advance directives for patients compulsorily admitted to hospital with serious mental disorders: Directive content and feedback from patients and professionals. Journal of Mental Health 13: 379–388.
Reilly, J., and J. Atkinson. 2010. The content of mental health advance directives: Advance statements in Scotland. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 33(2): 116–121.
Scottish Executive. 2004. The new mental health act: A guide to advance statements. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
Scottish Parliament. 2003. Mental health (care and treatment) (Scotland) act. Edinburgh: Stationery Office.
Sjöstrand, M., and G. Helgesson. 2008. Coercive treatment and autonomy in psychiatry. Bioethics 22(2): 113–120.
Srebnik, D., and L. Brodoff. 2003. Implementing psychiatric advance directives: Service provider issues and answers. The Journal of Behavioural Health Services & Research 30: 253–268.
Srebnik, D.S., J. Russo, J. Sage, T. Peto, and E. Zick. 2003. Interest in psychiatric advance statements among high users of crisis services and hospitalistion, paychiatric services 54: 330–336.
Swanson, J.W., M.S. Swartz, E.B. Elbogen, R.A. Van Dorn, J. Ferron, H.R. Wagner, B.J. McCauley, and M. Kim. 2006. Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: A randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness. The American Journal of Psychiatry 34: 43–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atkinson, J.M., Reilly, J. (2014). Limitations to the Scope and Binding Force of Advance Directives: The Conflict Between Compulsory Treatment and the Right to Self-Determination. In: Lack, P., Biller-Andorno, N., Brauer, S. (eds) Advance Directives. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 54. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7377-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7377-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7376-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7377-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)