Skip to main content

Critical Theory and Inclusive Transitions to School

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transitions to School - International Research, Policy and Practice

Abstract

In the context of inclusive educational policies, traditional understandings of children’s readiness for school are called into question. Readiness notions and grade retention practices are incompatible with contemporary Australian definitions of inclusion that incorporate children’s participation rights, their sense of belonging and being valued and their sustained progress in learning. Critical and post-structuralist theories frame re-conceptualisation of transitions to school as a longer-term, multifaceted process of supported change that makes non-stigmatising provision for the diverse range of Australian children, families and communities. Effective transition processes that support the participation rights of all children involve critical reflection on policy and practice within both early childhood education and care (ECEC) and school settings. Schools that are ready for the diverse range of school entrants engage in collaborative partnerships to support equitable provision for transitions, regardless of children’s abilities or backgrounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agbenyega, J. (2009). The Australian Early Development Index, who does it measure: Piaget or Vygotsky’s child? Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(2), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2011). Draft Australian curriculum Version 3. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/guide. Accessed 10 Oct 2012.

  • Boardman, M. (2006). The impact of age and gender on prep children’s academic achievements. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(4), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes, J., Harrison. L., Sweller, N., Taylor, A., & Neilsen-Hewett, C. (2009). From childcare to school: Influences on children’s adjustment and achievement in the year before school and in the first year of school. Report to New South Wales Department of Community Services. http://www.community.nsw.gov.au/docswr/_assets/main/documents/research_childcare_school.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2012.

  • Connor, J. (2011). Foundations for learning: Relationships between the early years learning framework and the Australian curriculum. http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/pdf/ECA_ACARA_Foundations_Paper/ECA_ACARA_Foundations)Paper_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2012.

  • Cronin, R., & Diezmann, C. (2002). Jane and Gemma go to school: Supporting young gifted Aboriginal children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(4), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., Gunn, A., Purdue, K., & Smith, K. (2007). Forging ahead: Moving towards inclusive and anti-discriminatory education. In L. Keesing-Styles & H. Hedges (Eds.), Theorising early childhood practice: Emerging dialogues (pp. 99–117). Sydney: Pademelon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, being & becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., Mason, T., & Perry, B. (2006). Successful transition to school for Australian Aboriginal children. Childhood Education, 82(3), 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2007). Transitions to school: Perceptions, expectations, experiences. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Readiness for school: A relational construct. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(1), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., Perry, B., Kearney, E., Hampshire, A., Mason, J., & Schmied, V. (2011). Facilitating children’s transition to school from families with complex support needs. Albury: Research Institute for Professional Practice, Learning and Education, Charles Sturt University. http://www.csu.edu.au/research/ripple/publications/index.htm. Accessed 6 May 2012.

  • Dunlop, A.-W. (2007). Bridging research, policy and practice. In A.-W. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Informing transitions in the early years: Research, policy and practice (pp. 151–168). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2006). The Giroux reader. Boulder: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graue, E. (2006). The answer is readiness – now what is the question? Early Education and Development, 17(1), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieshaber, S. (2009). Equity and quality in the early years of schooling. Curriculum Perspectives, 29(1), 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieshaber, S. (2008). Interrupting stereotypes: Teaching and the education of young children. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 505–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. (2004). Educational issues for the children of itinerant seasonal farm workers: A case study in an Australian context. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(3), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, E. (2007). Cultural complexity in early childhood: Images of contemporary young children from a critical perspective. Childhood Education, 83(5), 261–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilderry, A. (2004). Critical pedagogy: A useful framework for thinking about early childhood curriculum. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 29(4), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Mills, S. M. (2003). Teachers and school reform: Working with productive pedagogies and productive assessment. Melbourne Studies in Education, 44(2), 1–18 (Note: Melbourne Studies in Education has been re-named Critical Studies in Education).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. (2008). Kindergarten transition in a small rural school: From planning to implementation. Education in Rural Australia, 18(1), 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNaughton, G. (2003). Shaping early childhood: Learners, curriculum and contexts. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (2007). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTurk, N., Lea, T., Robinson, G., Nutton, G., & Carapetis, J. (2011). Defining and assessing the school readiness of Indigenous Australian children. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(4), 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, N. (2011). Korean children’s cultural adjustment during transition to the early years of school in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(3), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C., & Gale, T. (2002). Schooling and the production of inequalities: What can and should we be doing? Melbourne Studies in Education, 43(1), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2006). Starting strong 11: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petriwskyj, A. (2010). Diversity and inclusion in the early years. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(2), 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld, C. (2008). Contextual factors affecting inclusion during children’s transitions from preschool to school. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanagavarapu, P. (2010). Children’s transition to school: Voices of Bangladeshi parents in Sydney, Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(4), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiu, S. (2004). Maintaining the thread: Including young children with chronic illness in the primary classroom. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 29(1), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R. (2000). Professional partnerships for inclusive education. Melbourne Studies in Education, 41(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2010). Speaking back to educational policy: Why social inclusion will not work for disadvantaged schools. Critical Studies in Education, 15(2), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto, L., & Swadener, B. (2002). Towards libratory theory, research and praxis: De-colonising a field. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(1), 38–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, C., & Cope, P. (2003). An inclusive perspective on transition to primary school. European Education Research Journal, 2(2), 262–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayler, A. (2011). Coming ready or not: Aboriginal children’s transition to school in urban Australia and the policy push. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(2), 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzi, L. (2005). Beyond the dilemma of difference: The capability approach to disability and special educational needs. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(3), 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thamirajah, M., Grandison, K., & De-Hayes, L. (2008). Understanding school refusal: A handbook for professionals in education, health and social care. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, K., Tayler, C., Bridgstock, R., Grieshaber, S., Skoien, P., Danby, S., & Petriwskyj, A. (2005). Preparing for school: Report of the Queensland preparing for school trials 2003/2004. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology and Department of Education, Training and Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, P., Crivello, G., & Woodhead, M. (2008). Early childhood transitions research: A review of concepts, theory and practice. The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S., Dunbar, S., Meldrum, K., Whiteford, C., Carrington, S., Hand, K., Berthelsen, D., & Nicholson, S. (2012). The transition to school of children with developmental disabilities: Views of parents and teachers. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(3), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitton, D. (2005). Transition to school for gifted children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 30(3), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildy, H., & Styles, I. (2008). Measuring what students entering school know and can do: PIPS Australia 2006–2007. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(4), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (2006). Changing perspectives on early childhood: Theory, research and practice. UNESCO Strong Foundations background paper http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001474/147499e.pdf. Accessed 28 Nov 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Petriwskyj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petriwskyj, A. (2014). Critical Theory and Inclusive Transitions to School. In: Perry, B., Dockett, S., Petriwskyj, A. (eds) Transitions to School - International Research, Policy and Practice. International perspectives on early childhood education and development, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7350-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics