Skip to main content

Electronic Portfolio as a Knowledge Management Tool: A Comparative Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The 8th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

  • 2871 Accesses

Abstract

Traditionally, electronic portfolio tools focused mainly on the presentation of information, with an archive of digital data that are derived from the associated purpose of the presentation. Today, new electronic portfolio tools include digital environments for assembling and managing documents and all forms of media in a digital archive, and/or software applications for assembling and sorting portions of that archive for a particular purpose. This shares many features with knowledge management tools. Central to both tools is the knowledge creation stage. Based on our experiences of using electronic portfolio, this paper explores the potential use of electronic portfolio as a knowledge management (KM) tool for knowledge workers in organizations. Salient features of characteristics of KM tools are studied and these are matched against various electronic portfolio features. The paper then shows how the electronic portfolio can be used as a means to tackle the challenges faced at the individual context of the knowledge creation phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barrett HC (2007) Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: the REFLECT initiative. J Adolesc Adult Lit 50(6):436–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alavi M, Leidner DE (2001) Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. Mis Q 25(1):107–136

    Google Scholar 

  3. Von Krogh G (1998) Care in knowledge creation. Calif Manage Rev 40(3):133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nonaka I, Toyama R (2003) The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowl Manag Res Pr 1(1):2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Larsson R, Bengtsson L, Henriksson K, Sparks J (1998) The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organ Sci 9(3):285–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Spender J-C (1996) Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory. J Organ Change Manag 9(1):63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruggles R, Holtshouse D (1999) The knowledge advantage. Capstone, Dover

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tyndale P (2002) A taxonomy of knowledge management software tools: origins and applications. Eval Program Plann 25(2):183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Butler P, Anderson B, Brown M, Simpson M, Higgins A, Northover M, Meyer L, Connor M, Lamont M, Wyles R (2006) A Review of the literature on portfolios and electronic portfolios http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/community/eportfolios-new-zealand/resources/pages/review-literature-portfolios-and-electronic-portfo. Accessed 20 Aug 2013

  11. Cambridge DR, Cambridge BL, Yancey KB (2009) Electronic portfolios 2.0: emergent research on implementaton and impact. Stylus Publishing LLC, Sterling

    Google Scholar 

  12. Strohmeier S (2010) Electronic portfolios in recruiting? a conceptual analysis of usage. J Electron Commer Res 11(4):268–280

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nicole AB-M (2010) The e-portfolio paradigm: informing, educating, assessing, and managing with E-portfolios. Informing Science, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walk K (2013) How to write a comparative analysis. http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~wricntr/documents/CompAnalysis.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2013

  15. Gibson D, Barrett H (2003) Directions in electronic portfolio development. In: Society for information technology and teacher education international conference, vol 2003, pp 58–64

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hallam G, Creagh T (2010) ePortfolio use by university students in Australia: a review of the Australian e-portfolio project. High Educ Res Dev 29(2):179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Young R (2013) http://www.knowledge-management-online.com/ron-young.html. Accessed 08 Apr 2013

  18. National Council of Teachers of English (2013) Principles and practices in electronic portfolios. conference on college composition and communication, 2013–1998. http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/electronicportfolios. Accessed 06 May 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wardah Zainal-Abidin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zainal-Abidin, W., Uden, L., Alias, R.A. (2014). Electronic Portfolio as a Knowledge Management Tool: A Comparative Analysis. In: Uden, L., Wang, L., Corchado Rodríguez, J., Yang, HC., Ting, IH. (eds) The 8th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7287-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7287-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7286-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7287-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics