Abstract
Professional learning of teachers, both pre-service and in-service, is a complex process. Only recently research has begun to demonstrate that what and how teachers learn from teacher education and professional development programmes has an impact on whether and how they change their knowledge and practice (Desimone et al. 2002; Fishman et al. 2003). Studies on teachers’ professional learning have shown that high-quality professional development programmes must entail a form of inquiry (Little 2001; Lotter et al. 2006) that enables (pre-service and in-service) teachers to actively construct knowledge through practice and reflection (Guskey 1986, 2002; Schön 1983). Moreover, it has become clear that multiple strategies are necessary to effectively promote teacher learning. Several review studies revealed that for strategies aimed at promoting professional learning of teachers to be successful, the following elements are important: (a) an explicit focus on teachers’ initial knowledge, beliefs and concerns, (b) opportunities for teachers to experiment in their own practice, (c) collegial co-operation or exchange among teachers and (d) sufficient time for changes to occur (e.g. Bell and Gilbert 1996; Garet et al. 2001; Hawley and Valli 1999; Hewson 2007; Van Veen et al. 2010).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anderson, R. D.,& Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3–44). New York: National Association for Research in Science Teaching and National Science Teachers Association/Macmillan Publisher.
Ball, D. M., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., Wubbels, T., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (2000). The professional development of teachers. In R. J. Simons, J. van de Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic.
Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Falmer Press.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York: Macmillan.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199.
Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., Garet, M., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. (2002). Does professional development change teachers’ instruction? Results from a three-year study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112.
Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. A. (1977). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 3, 1–25.
Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643–658.
Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Education Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.
Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971–993.
Hashweh, M. Z. (2003). Teacher accommodative change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 421–434.
Hawley, W., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession. Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hewson, P. W. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1179–1203). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving in-service training: The message of research. Educational Leadership, 37, 379–385.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Investigating teachers’ ideas about models and modelling: Some issues of authenticity. In: Paper presented at the fourth international conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Noordwijkerhout, 19–23 Aug 2003.
Justi, R., & Van Driel, J. H. (2006). The use of the IMTPG as a framework for understanding the development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 437–450.
Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39, 591–598.
Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.
Korthagen, F. A. J., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Little, J. W. (2001). Professional development in pursuit of school reform. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 28–44). New York: Teachers College Press.
Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2006). Overcoming a learning bottleneck: Inquiry professional development for secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 185–216.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 877–904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Ponte, P., Ax, J., Beijaard, D., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Teachers’ development of professional knowledge through action research and the facilitation of this by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 571–588.
Rhine, S. (1998). The role of research and teachers’ knowledge base in professional development. Educational Researcher, 27(5), 27–31.
Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905–947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts as science education? In P. J. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 27–54). London: Palmer Press.
Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2007). Learning to teach science. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1151–1176). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think. New York: Basic Books.
Sprinthall, N. A., Reiman, A. J., & Thies-Sprinthall, L. (1996). Teacher professional development. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 666–703). New York: Macmillan.
Thompson, C. L., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession. Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 341–375). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tom, A. R., & Valli, L. (1990). Professional knowledge for teachers. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 372–392). New York: Macmillan.
Van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2010). Science teacher education. In B. McGraw, P. L. Peterson, & E. Baker (Eds.), Third international encyclopedia of education (pp. 712–718). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137–158.
Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., Meirink, J., & Verloop, N. (2010). Professional development of teachers: A review study on the effective characteristics of professional interventions of teachers. (Professionele ontwikkeling van leraren: een reviewstudie naar effectieve kenmerken van professionaliseringsinterventies van leraren). Leiden: ICLON/Expertisecentrum: Leren van Docenten.
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: A review of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.
Wongsopawiro, D. (2012). Examining science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in the context of a professional development programme. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.
Wubbels, T. (1992). Taking account of student teachers’ preconceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(2), 137–150.
Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues and answers report, REL 2007, Vol. 033). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T. C. M., & Bolhuis, S. (2007). Experienced teacher learning within the context of reciprocal peer coaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 165–187.
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank Dr. Rosária Justi and Dr. Dirk Wongsopawiro for allowing me to use the results of their studies and Dr. Amanda Berry for her help with the preparation of my plenary lecture and this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Driel, J.H. (2014). Professional Learning of Science Teachers. In: Bruguière, C., Tiberghien, A., Clément, P. (eds) Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7280-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7281-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)