Skip to main content

Professional Learning of Science Teachers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Contributions from Science Education Research ((CFSE,volume 1))

Abstract

Professional learning of teachers, both pre-service and in-service, is a complex process. Only recently research has begun to demonstrate that what and how teachers learn from teacher education and professional development programmes has an impact on whether and how they change their knowledge and practice (Desimone et al. 2002; Fishman et al. 2003). Studies on teachers’ professional learning have shown that high-quality professional development programmes must entail a form of inquiry (Little 2001; Lotter et al. 2006) that enables (pre-service and in-service) teachers to actively construct knowledge through practice and reflection (Guskey 1986, 2002; Schön 1983). Moreover, it has become clear that multiple strategies are necessary to effectively promote teacher learning. Several review studies revealed that for strategies aimed at promoting professional learning of teachers to be successful, the following elements are important: (a) an explicit focus on teachers’ initial knowledge, beliefs and concerns, (b) opportunities for teachers to experiment in their own practice, (c) collegial co-operation or exchange among teachers and (d) sufficient time for changes to occur (e.g. Bell and Gilbert 1996; Garet et al. 2001; Hawley and Valli 1999; Hewson 2007; Van Veen et al. 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, R. D.,& Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3–44). New York: National Association for Research in Science Teaching and National Science Teachers Association/Macmillan Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. M., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., Wubbels, T., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (2000). The professional development of teachers. In R. J. Simons, J. van de Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., Garet, M., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. (2002). Does professional development change teachers’ instruction? Results from a three-year study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. A. (1977). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 3, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Education Research Journal, 38, 915–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashweh, M. Z. (2003). Teacher accommodative change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 421–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, W., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession. Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. W. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1179–1203). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving in-service training: The message of research. Educational Leadership, 37, 379–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Investigating teachers’ ideas about models and modelling: Some issues of authenticity. In: Paper presented at the fourth international conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Noordwijkerhout, 19–23 Aug 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R., & Van Driel, J. H. (2006). The use of the IMTPG as a framework for understanding the development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 437–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39, 591–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A. J., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (2001). Professional development in pursuit of school reform. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 28–44). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2006). Overcoming a learning bottleneck: Inquiry professional development for secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 185–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 877–904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, P., Ax, J., Beijaard, D., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Teachers’ development of professional knowledge through action research and the facilitation of this by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 571–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhine, S. (1998). The role of research and teachers’ knowledge base in professional development. Educational Researcher, 27(5), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905–947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts as science education? In P. J. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 27–54). London: Palmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2007). Learning to teach science. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1151–1176). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprinthall, N. A., Reiman, A. J., & Thies-Sprinthall, L. (1996). Teacher professional development. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 666–703). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. L., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession. Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 341–375). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom, A. R., & Valli, L. (1990). Professional knowledge for teachers. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 372–392). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2010). Science teacher education. In B. McGraw, P. L. Peterson, & E. Baker (Eds.), Third international encyclopedia of education (pp. 712–718). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., Meirink, J., & Verloop, N. (2010). Professional development of teachers: A review study on the effective characteristics of professional interventions of teachers. (Professionele ontwikkeling van leraren: een reviewstudie naar effectieve kenmerken van professionaliseringsinterventies van leraren). Leiden: ICLON/Expertisecentrum: Leren van Docenten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: A review of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wongsopawiro, D. (2012). Examining science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in the context of a professional development programme. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wubbels, T. (1992). Taking account of student teachers’ preconceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(2), 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues and answers report, REL 2007, Vol. 033). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T. C. M., & Bolhuis, S. (2007). Experienced teacher learning within the context of reciprocal peer coaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 165–187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Dr. Rosária Justi and Dr. Dirk Wongsopawiro for allowing me to use the results of their studies and Dr. Amanda Berry for her help with the preparation of my plenary lecture and this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan H. Van Driel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Driel, J.H. (2014). Professional Learning of Science Teachers. In: Bruguière, C., Tiberghien, A., Clément, P. (eds) Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics