Abstract
A first part describes the state of implementation of Education for a Sustainable Development (ESD) from examples all around the world, showing its presence in most of curricula and syllabuses but with some differences among countries. A general problem is the teachers’ difficulty to take into account the multidisciplinary dimensions of ESD (ecological, social and economical) and to define their more or less impartial posture. ESD is also rooted in several kinds of values, some of them being linked to the preservation of the environment while others deal with universal human rights. Are teachers sharing these both categories of values all around the world? Are their conceptions, rooted in their values and social practice, different among various sociocultural contexts? Is there a correlation between the teachers’ conceptions on the environment and on human rights?
To answer to these research questions, a second part reports an international survey in 24 countries differing by their sociocultural and economical contexts (total = 8,749 teachers). The results show very significant differences among these countries. In the less developed ones, the teachers’ conceptions are more anthropocentric, for instance, revealing less awareness of the problematic limit of resources in our planet and less reticence to use GMO (genetically modified organisms). These teachers are more fervent believers in God and more religion-practising. They also agree more than others with sexist, racist and homophobic propositions: for instance, “It is for biological reasons that women more often than men take care of housekeeping”.
These points illustrate that changing curricula is easier than changing teachers’ conceptions and mainly changing their values and social practices. Training more and better all the teachers to ESD, including universal human rights, is an urgent challenge in any country.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Governo federal Brasil (2008). Educação Ambiental no Brasil, (March 2008), p. 9.
- 2.
Torres, M. (2009). La Educación Ambiental : una realidad en Colombia, 2009.
- 3.
- 4.
Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in Malaysia: An Overview. By Dr. Siti Eshah Mokshein, Ministry of Education Malaysia (August 2004)
- 5.
- 6.
BIOHEAD-Citizen (2004–2008). Biology, Health and Environmental Education for better Citizenship, STREP CIT2-CT-2004-506015, E. C., Brussels, FP6, Priority 7
- 7.
“Biology, Health and Environmental Education for better Citizenship”. This project was focused on six topics: evolution, human genetics, human brain, sex education, health education and ecology and environmental education. We were coordinating this last topic. For each topic, syllabuses and school textbooks were also analysed (Caravita et al. 2008, 2012, Caravita and Valente 2013; Clément et al. 2006, 2008; Carvalho et al. 2011; Quessada et al. 2008).
- 8.
With the exception of biology teachers’ conceptions differentiating France and Portugal (Forissier and Clément 2003)
References
Borg, C. & Gericke, N. (2012). Teachers’ understanding of sustainable development – discipline bound differences. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), E-book ESERA 2011 conference, science learning and citizenship (pp. 18–23), Part 8.
Brundtland. (1987). The report of the Brundtland Commission our common future. Oxford: University Press.
Caravita, S., & Valente, A. (2013, in press). Educational approach to environmental complexity in life sciences school manuals. An analysis across countries. Myint Swe Khine (Ed.), Critical analysis of science textbooks: Evaluating instructional effectiveness. Dordrecht/London: Springer.
Caravita, S., Valente, A., Luzi, D., Pace, P., Khalil, I., Berthou, G., Valanides, N., Kozan-Naumescu, A., & Clément, P. (2008). Construction and validation of textbook analysis grids for ecology and environmental education. Science Education International, 19(2), 97–116.
Caravita, S., Berthou-Gueydan, G., Agorram, B., & Clément, C. (2012). Environmental complexity and pollution in the life sciences manuals of six Mediterranean countries. In M. Boutan, B. Maurer, & H. Remaoun (Eds.), La Méditerranée des méditerranéens à travers leurs manuels scolaires (pp. 71–97). Paris: Harmattan.
Carvalho, G. S., Tracana, R. B., Skujiene, G., & Turcinaviciene, J. (2011). Trends in environmental education images of textbooks from Western and Eastern European countries and non-European countries. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2587–2610.
Clément, P. (2004). Construction des umwelts et philosophies de la nature. In J. M. Exbrayat & P. Moreau (Eds.), L’homme méditerranéen et son environnement (pp. 93–106). co-éd. Soc. Linéenne Lyon & Univ. Catholique Lyon: Fac. Sc. & Fac. Philo.
Clément, P. (2006). Didactic transposition and the KVP model: Conceptions as interactions between scientific knowledge, values and social practices. In Proceedings ESERA Summer School (pp. 9–18), IEC, Braga.
Clément, P. (2010). Conceptions, représentations sociales et modèle KVP. Skholê (Univ. de Provence, IUFM), 16, 55–70.
Clément, P., & Caravita, S. (2011). Education pour le Développement Durable (EDD) et compétences des élèves dans l’enseignement secondaire. Report for UNESCO. www.ensi.org/Publications/Publications-reports/
Clément, P., & Carvalho, G. (2007). Biology, health and environmental education for better citizenship: Teachers' conceptions and textbook analysis in 19 countries. In Proceedings WCCES XIII (World Council of Comparative Education Societies) (15pp.), Sarajevo, CD-Rom.
Clément, P., & Hovart, S. (2000). Environmental education: Analysis of the didactic transposition and of the conceptions of teachers. In H. Bayerhuber & J. Mayer (Eds.), State of the art of empirical research on environmental education (pp. 77–90). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
Clément, P., Mouehli, L., & Abrougui, M. (2006). Héréditarisme, béhaviorisme, constructivisme: Le système nerveux dans les manuels scolaires français et tunisiens. Aster, 42, 187–222.
Clément, P., Mouelhi, L., Kochkar, M., Valanides, N., Nisiforou, O., Thiaw, M. S., Ndiaye, V., Jeanbart, P., Horvarth, D., Ferreira, C., & Carvalho, G. (2008). Do the images of neuronal pathways in the human central nervous system show feed-back? A comparative study in fifteen countries. Science Education International, 19(2), 117–132.
Clément, P., Laurent, C., & Samonek, E. (2011b). Polish teachers’ conceptions related to environment. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis, Studia ad Didacticam Biologiae Pertinentia I, 86, 104–115.
Cotton, D. R. E. (2006). Teaching controversial environmental issues: Neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational Research, 48(2), 223–241.
Forissier, T. (2003). Les valeurs implicites dans l’Education à l’Environnement. Analyse de la formation d’enseignants de SVT et des conceptions de futurs enseignants français, allemands et portugais. Ph.D. thesis, Université Lyon 1, Lyon.
Forissier, T., & Clément, P. (2003). Les systèmes de valeurs d’enseignants du Secondaire sur la Nature et l’Environnement. Une analyse comparative en France, en Allemagne et au Portugal. Actes JIES (A. Giordan, J. L. Martinand, & D. Raichvarg eds, Univ. Paris Sud), 25, (pp. 393–398).
Gayford, C. (2002). Controversial environmental issues: A case study for the professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1191–1200.
Huron, P. (1994). Les valeurs. Lyon: Académie de Lyon.
Kelly, T. (1986). Discussing controversial issues: Four perspectives on the teacher’s role. Theory and Research in Social Education, 14, 113–138.
Khalil, I., Clément, P., & Laurent, C. (2007). Anthropocentrées, écolocentrées ou sentimentocentrées: Les conceptions d’enseignants et futurs enseignants libanais sur la nature et l’environnement. Feuilles Libanaises (Ligue Professeurs de l’Univ. Libanaise), 29, 67–92.
Khammar, F., Clément, P., Laurent, C., & Remki, L. (2008). Les conceptions d’enseignants algériens sur la nature et l’éducation à l’environnement. In Enjeux dans la rénovation de l’éducation à l’environnement et à la biologie (pp. 95–111). Alexandrie: Presses Université Senghor, http://www.usenghor-francophonie.org/publications/ActesColloqueCBEavril2008.pdf
Khzami, S., Agorram, A., Selmaoui, S., Elabboudi, T., & Clément, P. (2008). Les systèmes de valeurs d’enseignants et de futurs enseignants marocains des sciences de la vie et d’arabe sur l’environnement. In Enjeux dans la rénovation de l’éducation à l’environnement et à la biologie (pp. 223–238). Alexandrie: Presses Université Senghor. http://www.usenghor-francophonie.org/publications/ActesColloqueCBEavril2008.pdf
Lange, J. M. (2008). L’éducation au développement durable au regard des spécialités enseignantes. Aster, 46, 123–154.
Larrère, C. (1987). Les philosophies de l’environnement. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Latouche, S. (2006). Le pari de la décroissance. Paris: Fayard.
Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (1989). A cognitive approach to values. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 19, 169–193.
Munoz, F., Bogner, F., Clément, P., & Carvalho, G. S. (2009). Teachers’ conceptions of nature and environment in 16 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 407–413.
Quessada, M. P., Clément, P., Oerke, B., & Valente, A. (2008). Human evolution in science textbooks from twelve different countries. Science Education International, 19(2), 147–162.
Quillot, R. (2000). La nature. Paris: Ellipses, Coll. Philo.
Quinn, F., & Clément, P. (2012). Primary schools teachers’ conceptions of environment. A comparison between Australia and France. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), Ebook ESERA 2011 conference, science learning and citizenship (pp. 110–114), Part 8.
Sabatier, R., Lebreton, J. D., & Chessel, D. (1989). Principal component analysis with instrumental variables as a tool for modelling composition data. In R. Coppi & S. Bolasco (Eds.), Multiway data analysis (pp. 341–352). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 353–376.
Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255–265.
Schultz, P. W., Zelezny, L., & Dalrymple, N. J. (2000). A multinational perspective on the relation between Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 32(4), 576–591.
UNESCO. (2009a). Contextes et structures de l’Education pour le développement durable, DEDD 2005–2014, p. 9.
UNESCO. (2009b). The ESD Lens. Results of a review process by seven Southern Africa countries.
UNECE (2010). Expert Group on Competencies in ESD. Draft 2 (21 May 2010).
Urgelli & Simonneaux. (2012). Global warming: A case study of eight French teachers’ involvement in education for sustainable development. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), Ebook ESERA 2011 conference, science learning and citizenship (pp. 140–144), Part 8.
Wiseman, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2003). A higher-order model of ecological values and its relationship to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 783–794.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to all our colleagues of the 24 countries, who gathered data in their respective countries. For 18 of the 24, it was done with the help of the BIOHEAD-Citizen project (Biology, Health and Environmental Education for better Citizenship, STREP CIT2-CT-2004-506015, E. C., Brussels, FP6, Priority 7).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clément, P., Caravita, S. (2014). Education for Sustainable Development: An International Survey on Teachers’ Conceptions. In: Bruguière, C., Tiberghien, A., Clément, P. (eds) Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7280-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7281-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)