Abstract
Citizens with impairments manage a disabling environment of barriers, borders, walls, steps and inconvenience. Yet there have been transformations of buildings, roads and signs after decades of activism. Cake and Kent investigate how this analogue history applies to digital environments. The imperative for universal design – being aware of the multiple uses and literacies that approach any product of environment – is crucial when enabling a digital city.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
APIs allow different software programs to communicate, in this case allowing for the information to be accessed through a variety of different programs and devices.
- 2.
The prevalence of this practice has been contested, and there are obviously impairments that are not apparent in a new born child in any case. See Rose (2003).
- 3.
Ibid.
- 4.
V. Finkelstein “Attitudes and Disabled People: Issues for Discussion.” Disability Archive UK, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/finkelstein/attitudes.pdf
- 5.
Ibid., p. 6.
- 6.
The Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation Fundamental Principles of Disability November 1975 http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/UPIAS/fundamental\%20principles.pdf
- 7.
WC3 Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0), December 2008, http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/
- 8.
See Open311, http://open311.org/
- 9.
For example the New South Wales Guide Dog association provides training for people with vision impairments to use GPS enabled smart phones, http://www.guidedogs.com.au/what-we-do/mobility-devices
References
Ackerman, S. (2011, January 28). Egypt’s internet shutdown can’t stop mass protests. Wired. http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/01/egypts-internet-shutdown-cant-stop-mass-protests/#more-39575
Balasubramaniam, S., Lewis, G. A., Simanta, S., & Smith, D. B. (2008). Situated software: Concepts, motivation, technology, and the future. IEE Software, 25(6), 50–55.
Birkett, D. (2011, February 21). End this arts apartheid. The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/feb/21/disability-galleries-theatres-access-tate
Campbell, F. K. (2001). Inciting legal fictions: ‘Disability’s date with ontology and the Ableist body of the law. Griffith Law Review, 2, 42–62.
Campbell, F. K. (2008). Exploring internalised ableism using critical race theory. Disability and Society, 23(2), 151–162.
Centre for Universal Design. (1997). The Principles of Universal Design. Raleigh: North Carolina State University. http://www.ncsu.edu/www/ncsu/design/sod5/cud/pubs_p/docs/poster.pdf
Church, R. L., & Marston, J. R. (2003, January). Measuring accessibility for people with a disability. Geographical Analysis, 35(1), 83–96.
Driedger, D. (1989). The last civil rights movement: Disabled people international. London: Hurst.
Ellis, K. (2008). Disabling diversity: The social construction of disability in 1990s Australian National Cinema. Saarbrucken: VDM-Verlag.
Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2008, July). iTunes is pretty (useless) when you’re blind: Digital design is triggering disability when it could be a solution. M/C Journal, 11(3). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/55
Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2010a). Disability and new media. New York/London: Routledge.
Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2010b). Community accessibility: Tweeters take responsibility an accessible Web 2.0. Fast Capitalism, 7(1). http://www.uta.edu/huma/agger/fastcapitalism/7_1/elliskent7_1.html
Finkelstein, V. (2002, February). The social model of disability repossessed. Coalition. http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/finkelstein-soc-mod-repossessed.pdf
Froyen, H., Verdonck, E., De Meester, D., & Heylighen, A. (2009). Documenting handicap situations and eliminations through Universal Design Patterns. Australasian Medical Journal, 1(12), 199–203.
Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Oxford: Rowman& Littlefield.
Hill, D. (2008, February 11). The street as platform. Sound of City. http://www.cityofsound.com/blog/2008/02/the-street-as-p.html
Hughes, B. (2002). Disability and the body. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.), Disability studies today. Malden: Polity Press.
Imrie, R. (2001). Barriered and bound places and the spatialities of disability. Urban Studies, 38(2), 231–237.
Ingram, M. (2011, April 28). New York City sees its future as a data platform. GigaOM. http://gigaom.com/2011/04/28/new-york-city-sees-its-future-as-a-data-platform/
Jones, M. (2009, September 20). The city is a battlesuit for surviving the future. io9.com. http://io9.com/#!5362912/the-city-is-a-battlesuit-for-surviving-the-future
Jones, M. (2010, January). People are walking architecture or making NearlyNets with MujiComp. Paper presented at TechnoArk, Sierre. http://www.scribd.com/doc/31533915/People-Are-Walking-Architecture-or-making-NearlyNets-with-MujiComp-January-2010
Jones, N. L. (2011). The Americans with Disability Act: Application the Internet. In D. B. Bernardino (Ed.), Emerging technology issues for people with disabilities. New York: Nova.
Kent, M. (2008, December). Digital divide 2.0 and the digital subaltern. Nebula, (16), 84–97. www.nobleworld.biz/images/Kent3.pdf
Lavery, I., Davey, S., Woodside, A., & Ewart, K. (1996). The vital role of street design and management in reducing barriers to older peoples’ mobility. Landscape and Urban Planning, 35, 181–192.
Livingston, K. (2000, July). When architecture disables: Teaching undergraduates to perceive ableism in the built environment. Teaching Sociology, 28(3), 182–191.
Lowenhaupt, T. (2010, September 17). IGF Vilnius: City-TLD Governance Workshop. http://www.coactivate.org/projects/campaign-for.nyc/vilnius-workshop-report
Manley, S. (1996). Walls of exclusion: The role of local authorities in creating barrier free streets. Landscape and Urban Planning, 35, 137–152.
Neumann, P., & Uhlenkueken, C. (2001). Assistive technology and the barrier-free city: A case study from Germany. Urban Studies, 38(2), 367–376.
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Pendo, E. (2010). Taking it to the streets: A public right-of-way project for disability law. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 54, 901–915.
Rose, M. L. (2003). The staff of Oedipus. Transforming disability in ancient Greece. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Scotch, R. K. (1989). Politics and policy in the history of the disability rights movement. The Milbank Quarterly, 67(Suppl. 2, Pt 2), 380–400.
Shirky, C. (2004, March 30). Situated software in Clay Shirky’s writings about the Internet. Networks, Economics, and Culture. http://www.shirky.com/writings/situated_software.html
Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Thomas, C. (2002). Disability theory: Key ideas, issues and thinkers. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.), Disability studies today. Malden: Polity Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cake, D., Kent, M. (2014). Hacking the City: Disability and Access in Cities Made of Software. In: Brabazon, T. (eds) City Imaging: Regeneration, Renewal and Decay. GeoJournal Library, vol 108. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7235-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7235-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7234-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7235-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)