Advertisement

Classification of Singularities in Kinematics of Mechanisms

  • Samuli PiipponenEmail author
  • Teijo Arponen
  • Jukka Tuomela
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 15)

Abstract

In this short article we will discuss methods of finding and classifying singularities of planar mechanisms. The key point is to observe that the configuration spaces of the mechanisms can be understood as analytic and algebraic varieties. The set of singular points of an algebraic variety is itself an algebraic variety and of lower dimension than the original one. The singular variety can be computed using the Jacobian criterion. Once the singular points are obtained their nature can be investigated by investigating the localization of the constraint ideal at the local ring at this point. This will tell us if the singularity is an intersection of several motion modes or a singularity of a particular motion mode. The nature of the singularity can be then analyzed further by computing the tangent cone at this point.

Keywords

Kinematical singularities Planar mechanisms Algebraic geometry Local rings Tangent cone 

References

  1. 1.
    Müller, A., Rico, J.M.: Mobility and higher order local analysis of the configuration space of single-loops mechanisms. Adv. Rob. Kinematics 4, 215–224 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gosselin, C., Angeles, J.: Singularity analysis of closed loop kinematic chains. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 6(3), 119–132 (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sefrioui, J., Gosselin, C.: Singularity analysis and representation of planar parallel manipulators. J. Robot. Auton. Syst. 10, 209–224 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park, F.-C., Kim, J.-W.: Singularity analysis of closed kinematical chains. J. Mech. Des. 121(1), 32–38 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandyopadhyay, S., Ghosal, A.: Analysis of configuration space singularities of closed-loop mechanisms and parallel manipulators. Mech. Mach. Theory 39(5), 519–544 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raghavan, M., Roth, B.: Solving polynomial systems for the kinematic analysis and synthesis of mechanisms and manipulators. J. Mech. Des. 117(Issue B), 71–79 (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arponen, T., Piipponen, S., Tuomela, J.: Kinematic analysis of Bricard’s mechanism. Nonlinear Dyn. 56(1–2), 85–99 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arponen, T., Piipponen, S., Tuomela, J.: Analysis of singularities of a benchmark problem. Multibody Sys. Dyn. 19(3), 227–253 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Piipponen, S.: Singularity analysis of planar linkages. Multibody Sys. Dyn. 22(3), 223–243 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kreuzer, M., Robbiano, L.: Computational Commutative Algebra 2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greuel, G.-M., Pfister, G.: A Singular Introduction to Commutative Algebra. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cox, D., Little, J., O’Shea, D.: Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsumura, H.: Commutative Ring Theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, volume 8, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greuel, G.-M., Pfister, G., Schönemann, H.: Singular 3.1.5. A Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations, Centre for Computer Algebra, University of Kaiserslautern (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuli Piipponen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Teijo Arponen
    • 1
  • Jukka Tuomela
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and MathematicsUniversity of Eastern Finland KuopioFinland

Personalised recommendations