Abstract
The Brundtland commission defined sustainable development as: development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (Butlin (1989) Our common future, by World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, London, 1987). Translating this definition into an urban context has led to a focus on the use of indicators and indicator sets to quantify sustainability and guide government and stakeholder decisions. Although sustainability assessment methodologies demonstrate a direct link between indicator use and decisions made, there is limited discussion on how indicators actually help decisions. In this review, we examine 22 applied urban sustainability studies to assess whether indicators foster decisions. The 22 studies were analyzed on six dimensions that play a role in indicator development and use: the indicators themselves, stakeholder involvement, geographic and cultural impact, framing sustainability, definition of urban, and decision-making. Our results show that the connection between indicators and their effect on decision outcomes is not considered in indicator development, and although decision-making is briefly discussed by most of the evaluators it is rarely explored in-depth. In addition, vague definitions of sustainability and urban, geographic and cultural diversity, and a lack of concrete measures of the social qualities of sustainability have hampered the ability of indicators to create holistic decisions. We conclude that indicators themselves do not foster decisions and must be applied within a broader framework that can incorporate social and perceptual issues with indicators, such as multi-criteria decision analysis. Otherwise, the lack of clarity found in sustainability assessment prevents substantive decisions to improve environmental, economic, and social qualities of urban systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AbuSada J, Thawaba S (2011) Multi criteria analysis for locating sustainable suburban centers: a case study from Ramallah Governorate, Palestine. Cities 28(5):381–393
Brunner N, Starkl M (2004) Decision aid systems for evaluating sustainability: a critical survey. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24(4):441–469
Budd W, Lovrich N Jr, Pierce JC, Chamberlain B (2008) Cultural sources of variations in US urban sustainability attributes. Cities 25(5):257–267
Butlin J (1989) Our common future. By World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, London, 1987
Chunmiao C, Jincheng S (2009) Comprehensive evaluation on urban sustainable development of Harbin city in Northeast China. Chin Geogr Sci 19(2):144–150
Duran-Encalada JA, Paucar-Caceres A (2009) System dynamics urban sustainability model for Puerto Aura in Puebla, Mexico. Syst Pract Action Res 22(2):77–99
Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island/Stony Creek
Fan P, Qi J (2010) Assessing the sustainability of major cities in China. Springer, Japan
Florida R (2002) The economic geography of talent. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 92(4):743–755
Gagliardi F, Roscia M, Lazaroiu G (2007) Evaluation of sustainability of a city through fuzzy logic. Energy 32(5):795–802
Gonzalez Mejia AM (2011) Fisher information – sustainability analysis of several US metropolitan statistical areas. University of Cincinnati
Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D (2012) Foundations of structured decision making. In: Structured decision making. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 21–46
Grodach C (2011) Barriers to sustainable economic development: The Dallas-Fort Worth experience. Cities 28:300–309
Holden M (2006) Urban indicators and the integrative ideals of cities. Cities 23(3):170–183
Huang IB, Linkov I, Keisler J (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Sci Total Environ 409(19):3578–3594
Huang SL, Wong JH, Chen TC (1998) A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei’s urban sustainability. Landscape Urban Plann 42(1):15–27
Huang S, Yeh C, Budd WW, Chen L (2009) A sensitivity model (SM) approach to analyze urban development in Taiwan based on sustainability indicators. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29(2):116–125
Jarrar OM, Ai-Zoabi AY (2008) The applicability of sustainable city paradigm to the city of Jerusalem: criteria and indicators of efficiency. Build Environ 43(4):550–557
Jepson EJJ (2004) The adoption of sustainable development policies and techniques in U.S. cities: how wide, how deep, and what role for planners? J Plann Educ Res 23:229–241
Karvetski C, Lambert J, Keisler J, Linkov I (2011) Integration of decision analysis and scenario planning for coastal engineering and climate change. Syst Man Cybern Part A 41(1):63–73
Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I (2009) Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1(2):95–108
Kohsaka R (2010) Developing biodiversity indicators for cities: applying the DPSIR model to Nagoya and integrating social and ecological aspects. Ecol Res 25(5):925–936
Lee Y, Huang C (2007) Sustainability index for Taipei. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27(6):505–521
Li F, Liu X, Hu D, Wang R, Yang W, Li D, Zhao D (2009) Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing urban sustainable development: a case study for China’s Jining city. Landscape Urban Plann 90(3–4):134–142
Linkov I, Moberg E (2012) Multi criteria decision analysis: environmental applications and case studies. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Kiker G, Batchelor C, Bridges T, Ferguson E (2006) From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. Environ Int 32(8):1072–1093
Liu G, Yang Z, Chen B, Ulgiati S (2011) Monitoring trends of urban development and environmental impact of Beijing, 1999–2006. Sci Total Environ 409(18):3295–3308
Merad M, Dechy N, Marcel F, Linkov I (2013) Multiple-criteria decision aiding framework to analyze and assess the governance of sustainability. Eviron Syst Decis 33(2):305–321
Moussiopoulos N, Achillas C, Vlachokostas C, Spyridi D, Nikolaou K (2010) Environmental, social and economic information management for the evaluation of sustainability in urban areas: a system of indicators for Thessaloniki, Greece. Cities 27(5):377–384
Pope J, Annandale D, Morrison-Saunders A (2004) Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24(6):595–616
Posner SM, Costanza R (2011) A summary of ISEW and GPI studies at multiple scales and new estimates for Baltimore city, Baltimore county, and the state of Maryland. Ecol Econ 70(11):1972–1980
Reader J (2004) Cities. Grove, New York
Scipioni A, Mazzi A, Zuliani F, Mason M (2008) The ISO 14031 standard to guide the urban sustainability measurement process: an Italian experience. J Cleaner Prod 16(12):1247–1257
Sheate W (2010) Tools, techniques and approaches for sustainability: collected writings in environmental assessment policy and management. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore
Shen L, Jorge Ochoa J, Shah MN, Zhang X (2011) The application of urban sustainability indicators – a comparison between various practices. Habitat Int 35(1):17–29
Tanguay GA, Rajaonson J, Lefebvre J, Lanoie P (2010) Measuring the sustainability of cities: an analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecol Indic 10(2):407–418
Thomson Reuters (2012) ISI web of knowledge. http://webofknowledge.com Accessed 15 Jan 2013
U.S. Economic Development Administration (2013) The triple bottom line tool. Accessed 27 Jan 2013
United Nations (2012) Demographic yearbook. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/dyb2009-2010.htm Accessed 1 Jan 2013
Van Assche J, Block T, Reynaert H (2010) Can community indicators live up to their expectations? The case of the Flemish city monitor for livable and sustainable urban development. Appl Res Qual Life 5(4):341–352
van Dijk MP, Mingshun Z (2005) Sustainability indices as a tool for urban managers, evidence from four medium-sized Chinese cities. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25(6):667–688
Wen ZG, Zhang KM, Huang L, Du B, Chen WQ, Li W (2005) Genuine saving rate: an integrated indicator to measure urban sustainable development towards an ecocity. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 12(2):184–196
Yu L, Hou X, Gao M, Shi P (2010) Assessment of coastal zone sustainable development: a case study of Yantai, China. Ecol Indic 10(6):1218–1225
Yu Y, Wen Z (2010) Evaluating China’s urban environmental sustainability with data envelopment analysis. Ecol Econ 69(9):1748–1755
Yuan W, James P, Hodgson K, Hutchinson SM, Shi C (2003) Development of sustainability indicators by communities in China: a case study of Chongming county, Shanghai. J Environ Manage 68(3):253–261
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tatham, E.K., Eisenberg, D.A., Linkov, I. (2014). Sustainable Urban Systems: A Review of How Sustainability Indicators Inform Decisions. In: Linkov, I. (eds) Sustainable Cities and Military Installations. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7161-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7161-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7160-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7161-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)