Abstract
This chapter looks at the effect of gender on words retrieved by the same sample of English as Foreign Language Learners at two points of time: sixth grade and ninth grade. The prompts were: ‘Body’, ‘Food’, ‘School’, ‘Town’, ‘Countryside’, ‘Transport’, ‘Animals’, ‘Sports’, and ‘Professions’. The study provides evidence of a significant increase of word responses in 9th grade for all cue words and for both groups. This result is relevant for lexical availability as well as for vocabulary research as it proves that learners continue learning words within each of the semantic categories represented by the cue words. The study is also relevant for sociolinguistic research on gender and language education as it reveals significant differences in favour of females in six prompts out of nine at the two collection times.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Wilcoxon-signed rank test for non-parametric comparison of two related samples was conducted. Significance values for all pairs are p = .000.
- 2.
The Mann–Whitney test for non-parametric comparison of two independent samples was conducted. The p values are as follows: ‘Transport’: .117, ‘Town’: .110, ‘School’: .05, ‘Professions’: .046, ‘Countryside’: .019, ‘Hobbies’: .014, ‘Parts of the body’: 002, ‘Animals’: .005, ‘Food and drink’: .000. Significant level is set at p = .05.
- 3.
The Wilcoxon-signed rank test for non-parametric comparison of two related samples was conducted. Significance values for all pairs are p = .000.
References
Agustín Llach, M.P. 2009. Gender differences in vocabulary acquisition in the foreign language in primary education: Evidence from lexical errors, Biblioteca de Investigación 54. Logroño: La Rioja University Press.
Agustín Llach, M.P. 2010. Exploring the role of gender in lexical creations. In Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign languages, ed. R.M. Jiménez Catalán, 74–92. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Agustín Llach, M.P., and M. Terrazas Gallego. 2013. Vocabulary knowledge development and gender differences in a second language. ELIA 22: 45–75.
Al-Ohtman, N.M.A. 2004. The relationship between gender and learning styles in Internet-based teaching – A study from Kuwait. The Reading Matrix 41: 38–54.
Andreou, G., F. Vlachos, and E. Andreou. 2005. Affecting factors in second language learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 345: 429–438.
Bacon, S. 1992. The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. The Modern Language Journal 76: 160–178.
Boyle, J.P. 1987. Sex differences in listening vocabulary. Language Learning 372: 273–284.
Brantmeier, C. 2003. Does gender make a difference? Passage content and comprehension in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 151: 1–27.
Brantmeier, C. 2004. Gender, violence-oriented passage content and second language reading comprehension. The Reading Matrix 42: 1–19.
Carcedo González, A. 1998. Sobre las pruebas de disponibilidad léxica para estudiantes de español LE. RILCE 142: 205–224.
Carcedo González, A. 2000. Disponibilidad léxica en español como lengua extranjera: el caso finlandés estudio de nivel preuniversitario, y cotejo con tres fases de adquisición. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.
Casey, M.B. 1996. Gender, sex, and cognition: Considering the interrelationship between biological and environmental factors. Learning and Individual Differences 81: 39–53.
Chavez, M. 2000. Gender in the language classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fernández Fontecha, A. 2010. Gender and motivation in EFL vocabulary production. In Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign languages, ed. R.M. Jiménez Catalán, 93–116. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
García Marcos, F., and M.V. Mateo García. 1997. Disponibilidad Léxica y Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras. Docencia e Investigación. Cuenca: Universidad de Castilla La Mancha.
Germany, P., and N. Cartes. 2000. Léxico disponible en inglés como segunda lengua en instrucción formalizada. Revista Estudios Pedagógicos 26: 39–50.
Grace, C. 2000. Gender differences: Vocabulary retention and access to translations for beginning language learners in CALL. The Modern Language Journal 84(2): 214–224.
Hellekant, J. 1994. Are multiple-choice tests unfair to girls? System 22(3): 349–352.
Hernández Cabrera, C.E., and M. Samper Hernández. 2006. Léxico disponible, norma culta y norma popular. In memoriam Manuel Alvar, II. Rosa M.ª Castañar y José M.ª Enguita, 1341–1358. Zaragoza: Institución “Fernando el Católico”.
Hernández Muñoz, N. 2010. Social aspects of oral and written lexical production in Spanish. SKY Journal of Linguistics 23: 101–123.
Hyde, J.S., and M.C. Linn. 1988. Gender differences in verbal abilities. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1041: 53–69.
Jiménez, R.M. 2003. Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 131: 54–77.
Jiménez, R.M. 2010. Gender tendencies in EFL across vocabulary tests. In Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign languages, ed. R.M. Jiménez Catalán, 117–139. Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jiménez, R.M., and J. Ojeda. 2008. The English vocabulary of boys and girls: Similarities or differences? Evidence from a quantitative study. In Theoretical and methodological approaches to gender and language study, ed. L. Litosseliti, H. Sauton, K. Segall, and J. Sunderland, 103–118. Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jiménez, R.M., and J. Ojeda. 2009. Girls’ and Boys’ lexical availability in English as a foreign language. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics 158: 57–76.
Jiménez, R.M., and M. Terrazas. 2005–2008. The receptive vocabulary of English foreign language young learners. Journal of English Studies 5–6: 173–191.
Kiss, C., and M. Nikolov. 2005. Preparing, piloting and validating an instrument to measure young learners’ aptitude. Language Learning 551: 99–150.
Kissau, S. 2006. Gender differences in motivation to learn French. Canadian Modern Language Review 623: 401–422.
Lin, J., and F. Wu. 2003. Differential performance by gender in foreign language testing. Poster for the 2003 annual meeting of NCME Chicago, Chicago.
Linn, M.C., and A.C. Petersen. 1985. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis. Child Development 56: 1479–1498.
Mori, S., and P. Gobel. 2006. Motivation and gender in the Japanese EFL classroom. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics 34(2): 194–210.
Ojeda Alba, J., and R.M. Jiménez Catalán. 2007. The worlds children’s words build. Didáctica (Lengua y Literatura) 19: 155–172.
Reyes Diaz, M.J. 1999. Acerca de la relación entre la variable sexo y el aprendizaje léxico. In Contribuciones al estudio de la Lingüística Aplicada. Logroño: Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada, ed. J. de las Cuevas, D. Fasla, 387–391. ISBN: 84-605-8800-9.
Samper Hernández, M. 2002. Disponibilidad léxica en alumnos de español como lengua extranjera, Colección Monografías, núm. 4. Málaga: ASELE.
Samper Padilla, J.A., and C.E. Hernández Cabrera. 1997. Estudio de la disponibilidad léxica en Gran Canaria. Datos iniciales y variación sociolingüística. Contribuciones al estudio de la lingüística hispánica Homenaje a Ramón Trujillo Carreño, Vol. II, 229–239. La Laguna: Universidad de la Laguna.
San Mateo Valdehita, A. 2003–2004. Aprendizaje de léxico en español como segunda lengua. Investigación sobre tres métodos. Unpublished M.Phil. thesis, UNED. Available online at http://www.mec.es/redele/biblioteca2005/san_mateo.shtml
Scarcella, R., and C. Zimmerman. 1998. Academic words and gender. ESL student performance on a test of academic lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 27–49.
Schaer, U., and U. Bader. 2003. Evaluation Englisch an der Primarschule Projekt 012. http://www.ai.ch/dl.php/de/20031110083112/Evaluationsbericht+07.11.2003.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2010.
Spellerberg, S.M. 2011. L3 English acquisition in Denmark and Greenland: Gender-related tendencies. International Journal of Multilingualism 8(3): 155–188.
Stumpf, H. 1995. Gender differences in performance on tests of cognitive abilities: Experimental design issues and empirical results. Learning and Individual Differences 7: 275–288.
Takala, S. 2000. Test fairness: A DIF analysis of an L2 vocabulary test. Language Testing 173: 323–340.
Wen, Q., and R.K. Johnson. 1997. L2 learner variables and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level English majors in China. Applied Linguistics 181: 27–48.
Yang, Y. 2001. Sex and language proficiency level in color-naming performance. An ESL/EFL perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 112: 238–256.
Young, D.J., and R. Oxford. 1997. A gender-related analysis of strategies used to process written input in the native language and a foreign language. Applied Language Learning 81: 43–73.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the financial support of FEDER and Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación through grant nº FFI2010-19334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
del Pilar Agustín Llach, M., Fontecha, A.F. (2014). Lexical Variation in Learners’ Responses to Cue Words: The Effect of Gender. In: Jiménez Catalán, R. (eds) Lexical Availability in English and Spanish as a Second Language. Educational Linguistics, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7158-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7158-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7157-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7158-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)