Skip to main content

Children’s Constructions of a Sample Space with Respect to the Law of Large Numbers

  • Chapter
  • 3178 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

The chapter describes how children use an expressive microworld to articulate ideas about how to make a game seem fair or not with the use of randomness. An open computer game was designed for children to express understanding of randomness as formal conjectures, so that they were able to examine the consequences of their understanding. The study investigates how 23 children, aged between \(5\frac{6}{12}\) and 8 years, engaged in constructing a crucial part of a mechanism for a fair or not spatial lottery machine (microworld). In particular, the children tried to construct a fair game given a situation in which the key elements happened randomly. The children could select objects, determine their properties, and arrange their spatial layout in the machine. The study is based on task-based interviewing of children who were interacting with the computer game. The findings identify children’s initial meanings for expressing stochastic phenomena and describe how the computer tool-based game helped shift children’s attempts to understand randomness from looking for ways to control random behaviour, towards looking for ways to control events. Evidence is presented that the children constructed a set of situated abstractions (Noss 2001) for ideas such as the Law of Large Numbers. The computer game offered children the opportunity to make their own constructions of a sample space and distribution. The children used spontaneously five distinct strategies to express the idea that their construction could only be judged with respect to a large number of trials. It is apparent that the game provided children the opportunity to express the idea that stability can come from increasing outcomes with different strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This study is based on aspects of my doctoral research (Paparistodemou 2004). I acknowledge Professor Richard Noss and Professor Dave Pratt for their help and support throughout this study.

References

  • Abrahamson, D. (2009). Embodied design: constructing means for constructing meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acredolo, C., O’Connor, J., Banks, L., & Horobin, K. (1989). Children’s ability to make probability estimates: skills revealed through application of Anderson’s functional measurement methodology. Child Development, 60, 933–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi, D., & Arcavi, A. (2001). Junior High school students’ constructions of global views of data and data representations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45, 35–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borovcnik, M., & Bentz, H. (1991). Empirical research in understanding probability. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: probability in education (pp. 73–105). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. (1984). In the field. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, E., & Zazkis, E. (2011). From personal to conventional probabilities: from sample set to sample space. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Even, R., & Kvatinsky, R. (2010). What mathematics do teachers with contrasting teaching approaches address in probability lessons? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R., Falk, R., & Levin, I. (1980). A potential for learning probability in young children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. London: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2005). Towards “Probability Literacy” for all citizens: building blocks and instructional dilemmas. In G. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenge for learning and teaching (pp. 39–63). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, B., & Henriksen, M. (1998). Probability and health risks. Risk, health and health care (pp. 65–105). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., Langrall, C., Thornton, C., & Mogill, A. (1997). A framework for assessing and nurturing young children’s thinking in probability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the study of statistical intuitions. Cognition, 11, 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C., & Pollatsek, A. (2002). Data analysis as the search for signals in noisy processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 259–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., Lohmeier, J., & Lipson, A. (1993). Inconsistencies in probabilistic reasoning of novices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 392–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langrall, C., & Mooney, E. (2005). Characteristics of elementary school students’ probabilistic reasoning. In G. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: challenge for learning and teaching (pp. 95–119). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, K. (1998). Emergent understanding and attribution of randomness: comparative analysis of reasoning of primary grade children and undergraduates. Cognition and Instruction, 16(3), 285–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. (2001). For a learnable mathematics in the digital culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1996). An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1, 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paparistodemou, E. (2004). Children’s expressions of randomness: constructing probabilistic ideas in an open computer game. PhD Dissertation, Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paparistodemou, E., & Noss, R. (2004). Designing for local and global meanings of randomness. In Proceedings of the twenty eighth annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Bergen, Norway (Vol. 3, pp. 497–504).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paparistodemou, E., Noss, R., & Pratt, D. (2008). The interplay between fairness and randomness in a spatial computer game. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 13(2), 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D. (2000). Making sense of the total of two dice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 602–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D., & Noss, R. (2002). The micro-evolution of mathematical knowledge: the case of randomness. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 453–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. (2002). A first course in probability (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A. (2002). Interactive visualizations of statistical relationships: what do we gain? In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference on teaching of statistics (ICOTS 6), Cape Town. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, H., & Tarr, J. (2002). Developing notions of inference using probability simulations tools. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(3), 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: a dynamic systems perspective to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Efi Paparistodemou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paparistodemou, E. (2014). Children’s Constructions of a Sample Space with Respect to the Law of Large Numbers. In: Chernoff, E., Sriraman, B. (eds) Probabilistic Thinking. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics