Skip to main content

The Use of Spatial Planning to Increase the Resilience for Future Turbulence in the Spatial System of the Groningen Region to Deal with Climate Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Swarm Planning

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

Abstract

The province of Groningen is responsible for a good spatial policy. Main focal areas of interest are living, economic and social development, water management, transport and traffic environmental policy. These fields are integrated on a regular basis in a regional plan, which is made for the entire provincial area. In 2008 a new regional plan has been developed. The circumstances and context determine the content of the plan in a strong way. The current timeframe distinguishes itself in the way long-term developments appear. The supply of energy is uncertain, because fossil resources will be depleted within 40 years from now. The changes in climate are unpredictable as well, but they will have, for sure, a major impact on society. The turbulence in today’s and the future’s world is and will be strongly determined by the issues of energy supply (and prices) and climate change (and disasters). For a province it is important to respond to these developments in the most appropriate way, i.e. with the lowest risk and the lowest chance on problems for its inhabitants. The province of Groningen wants to be prepared to withstand eventual rapid changes and prepare its people by increasing resilience in its spatial planning (Roggema 2008a). In order to create more resilience in its regional plan the province explores in several research steps (Fig. 5.1) the adaptability of spatial systems and the way they may be influenced. In Sect. 5.2 the background of climate change on a sub-regional level as well as the relevant aspects of complexity and adaptive systems are explored. This section concludes with the characteristics of an emerging new planning paradigm: swarm planning. Section 5.3 explores the possibilities to use this planning paradigm in the Groningen case. This contribution finishes with a discussion on the benefits and disadvantages of the new paradigm (Sect. 5.4) and finalises with conclusions (Sect. 5.5).

This chapter has previously been published in the double blind peer reviewed conference proceedings of the UK Systems Society conference Building Resilience: Responses to a Turbulent World, Oxford, 1–3 September 2008: ‘Roggema, R. (2008) The use of spatial planning to increase the resilience for future turbulence in the spatial system of the Groningen region to deal with climate change’. A more concise version has been published in the double blind peer reviewed conference proceedings of the World Sustainable Building Conference, Melbourne, 21–25 September 2008: ‘Roggema, R. and A. van den Dobbelsteen (2008) Swarm planning: development of a new planning paradigm, which improves the capacity of regional spatial systems to adapt to climate change’ and received the scientific award for the best paper during this SB08-conference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACIA. (2005). Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adviescommissie Gebiedsontwikkeling. (2005). Ontwikkel kracht!. Amersfoort: Lysias Consulting Group B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alders, H. (2006). De waterkolom als veiligheidspartner. Den Haag: Pinpoint congres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alterra, KNMI & DHV. (2008). Klimaatschetsboek Groningen en Drenthe. Wageningen: Klimaat voor Ruimte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakas, A. (2005). Megatrends Nederland. Schiedam: Scriptum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakas, A. (2006). Megatrends Europe. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boskalis (2006). Plan voor de Vlaams-Hollandse kust. Adriaan Geuze. In Buitenhof, 31 December 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau Stroming B.V. (2006). Natuurlijke klimaatbuffers, adaptatie aan klimaatverandering, wetlands als waarborg. Vereniging Natuurmonumenten, Vogelbescherming Nederland, Staatsbosbeheer, ARK Natuurontwikkeling, Waddenvereniging.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. (2006). Aan de polen trekt alles zich nu terug. Interview In De Volkskrant, 7 Oktober 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1995). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (2001). Wicked problems and social complexity (p. 11). CogNexus Institute [online]. http://cognexus.org/wpf/wickedproblems.pdf

  • Dammers, E. (2000). Leren van de toekomst. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boo, M. (2005). Verdronken Wadden. In NRC, 20 maart 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Roo, G. (2006). Understanding planning and complexity—a systems approach. Cardiff: AESOP-working group complexity and planning, May 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • DHV. (2007). Ruimtelijke impact klimaatverandering, Toekomstbeelden voor 2050. Groningen: provincie Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esselbrugge, M. (2003). Openheid en geslotenheid: een kwestie van combineren. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eye Magazine. (2007). De nieuwe economie draait om liefde. Interview met Martijn Aslander, Eye Magazine, November 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldof, G. (2002). Coping with complexity in integrated water-management. Enschede, Deventer: Universiteit Twente, Tauw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point. New York: Little, Brown and Company, Time Warner Book Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, A. (2006). An inconvenient truth. New York: Rodale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, S. (2003). Tomorrow’s people: How 21st century technology is changing the way we think and feel. London: Penguin books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homan, T. (2005). Organisatiedynamica. Den Haag: Sdu uitgevers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyink, W. (2006). Startdocument voor een nieuw Omgevingsplan Groningen. Groningen: Provincie Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innovatienetwerk Groene Ruimte en Agrocluster, International Centre for Integral Studies & Ministerie van LNV (2002) Samenleving in transitie, een vernieuwend gezichtspunt. Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2007a). Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis, Working Group I Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2007b). Climate Change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPO. (2001). Van ordenen naar ontwikkelen. Den Haag: Interprovinciaal overleg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., & Roggema, R. (2005). Swarm planning. Term invented during searching conversation, Brainstorm June 2005, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karelse van der Meer. (2003). Urban design Blauwe Stad. Groningen: Province of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • KNMI. (2006). Klimaat in de 21ste eeuw, vier scenario’s voor Nederland. De Bilt: KNMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meliefste, C. J., Ankersmit, G. J., Meere, M., & Verwer, E. A. (2008). Building on structures, adaptation to climate change. WUR, Master atelier Landscape Architecture: Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendini, Atelier Mendini. (1994). Groninger Museum. Bergamo: Fabbri editori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van VROM. (2003). Van hindermacht naar ontwikkelkracht? Den Haag: Ministerie van VROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and Chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • MNP. (2005). Effecten van klimaatverandering in Nederland. Bilthoven: MNP.

    Google Scholar 

  • MVRDV. (1999). Ontwikkelingsplan Werklocaties Almmere Poort, Proposal. Rotterdam: MVRDV.

    Google Scholar 

  • MVRDV, KCAP, & Roggema, R. (2001). Working city, Development plan working locations, Almere Poort. Almere: Department of Urban development, Municipality of Almere.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Geographic. (2007). De grote dooi (pp. 78–93). National Geographic, nummer 6, juni 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC Next. (2007). Werken zonder uurtje-factuurtje. In NRC Next, 7 November 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridderstråle, J., & Nordström, K. (2004). Karaoke capitalism. Harlow: Pearson education Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2004). De waterstofeconomie. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H., Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. Amsterdam: Elsevier Sientific Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (2006). The lovemarks effect, winning the consumer revolution. New York: PowerHouse Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R. (2005). Hansje Brinker, take your finger away. Oxford: Oxford Futures Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R. (2007a). Spatial impact of adaptation to climate change in Groningen, move with time. Groningen: Province of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R. (2007b). Climate proof regional design in the province of Groningen. Presentation congress Climate Changes Spatial Planning, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R. (Ed.). (2008a). Tegenhouden of meebewegen, adaptatie aan klimaatverandering en de ruimte. Amsterdam: WEKA Uitgeverij B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R. (2008b). Landschap 2.0. In R. Roggema (red.), Tegenhouden of meebewegen, adaptatie aan klimaatverandering en de ruimte. Amsterdam: WEKA uitgeverij B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R. (2008c). Swarm planning: A new design paradigm dealing with long term problems, like climate change. In R. Ramirez, J. W. Selsky, & K. van der Heijden (Eds.), Business planning for turbulent times. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R. (2008d). Climate change, energy-potentials and regional design. Wageningen. PhD-proposal, Delft University of Technology and Wageningen University & Research Centre, Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R., & Huyink, W. (2007). Atlas Groningen: Analytical document Environmental-Spatial plan—draft internal document. Groningen: Province of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2006). How was becomes. In C. A. Brebbia, et al. (Eds.), The management of natural resources, sustainable development and ecological hazards: The ravage of the planet. Southampton: WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R., van den Dobbelsteen, A., & Stegenga, K. (2006). Pallet of possibilities, Grounds for change. Groningen: Province of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruimtelijk Planbureau. (2004). Ontwikkelingsplanologie, lessen uit en voor de praktijk. Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Sir N. (2006). STERN REVIEW: The economics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisman, G. R. (1997). Sturen via creatieve concurrentie. Nijmegen: Inaugurele rede Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, W. (2004). Crises and innovation in sustainable city planning. In 3rd International Conference on Urban Regeneration and Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A., & Toffler, H. (2006). Revolutionaire rijkdom, Hoe de nieuwe welvaart onze levens gaat veranderen. Amsterdam, Antwerpoen: Uitgeverij Contact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2006). Climate change and more. In R. Roggema, A. van den Dobbelsteen, & K. Stegenga (Eds.), Pallet of possibilities. Groningen: provincie Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Dobbelsteen, A., Roggema, R., & Stegenga, K. (2006). Grounds for change—The sustainable redevelopment of a region under threat of climate change and energy depletion. In Proceedings SASBE06, Shanghai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Dobbelsteen, A., Jansen, S., & van Timmeren, A. (2007). Naar een energiegestuurd POP. Groningen, Delft: Delft University of Technology, Provincie Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, A. (2006). Ontwikkelen op niveau. Den Haag: Provincie Zuid-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooy, P., van Luin en E. Dil, A. (2006). Nederland boven water, praktijkboek gebiedsontwikkeling. Gouda: Habiforum.

    Google Scholar 

  • VROM-raad (2004). Gereedschap voor ruimtelijke ontwikkelingspolitiek. Den Haag: VROM-raad.

    Google Scholar 

  • VROM-raad (2006). Slimmer investeren: advies over het besluitvormingsproces bij strategische rijksinvesteringen. Den Haag: VROM-raad Advies 057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R. & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-economic systems. Ecology and society 9(2), 5 [Online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/

  • Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign: Wolfram Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRR. (1998). Ruimtelijke ontwikkelingspolitiek. Rapporten aan de regering nr, 53. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld, W. (1991). Conceptvorming in de ruimtelijke planning. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Roggema .

The Bridge: Five–Six

The Bridge: Five–Six

This chapter used complexity and resilience thinking to develop a future design that is more capable of dealing with uncertainty. In Chap. 6 this thinking is further elaborated. The properties of Complex Adaptive Systems are translated into spatial planning practice. Self-organisation, emergence and adaptive capacity are used as the basic principles of design, thus increasing the flexibility, diversity and resilience in urban and rural systems. In this chapter, these properties are used to design the Floodable Landscape, a design that deals with uncertainties and is a future spatial vision that is capable of dealing with unknown changes and surprises in weather and climate. It is a ‘Swarming Landscape’, not only increasing the resilience of cities and landscapes, but also provides an attractive and imaginable spatial future. This chapter/article is published in the proceedings of the 4th International Urban Design Conference 2011.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roggema, R. (2014). The Use of Spatial Planning to Increase the Resilience for Future Turbulence in the Spatial System of the Groningen Region to Deal with Climate Change. In: Swarm Planning. Springer Theses. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7152-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics