Advertisement

Introduction, Methodology, Limitations

  • Rob RoggemaEmail author
Chapter
  • 1k Downloads
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

The current status and significance of climate adaptation and its connections with spatial planning can be interpreted taking different perspectives. Scientific conferences, research programmes and writings are subsequently used as lenses of observation.

Keywords

Adaptive Capacity Climate Change Adaptation Spatial Planning Participative Action Research Climate Adaptation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aarts, N., & van Woerkom, C. (2002). Dealing with uncertainty in solving complex problems. In C. Leeuwis & R. Pyburn (Eds.), Wheelbarrows full of frogs, social learning in rural resource management. van Gorcum: Assen.Google Scholar
  2. Beatley, T. (1994). Habitat conservation planning: Endangered species and urban growth. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beatley, T. (2009). Planning for coastal resilience: Best practices for calamitous times. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berke, P. (1992). Planning for earthquakes: Risk, politics and policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berke, P. (1997). After the hurricane: Linking recovery to sustainable development in the caribbean. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blanco, H., & Alberti, M. (2009). Building capacity to adapt to climate change through planning. In: H. Blanco, & M. Alberti (Eds.) (2009) Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: Emerging research agendas in planning. Progress in Planning 71, 153–205.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks, N., Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. M. (2005). The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 15(2), 151–163.Google Scholar
  8. Brower, D., & Schwab, A. (1994). An introduction to coastal zone management (1st ed.). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brower, D. J., & Schwab, A. (2002). An introduction to coastal zone management (2nd ed.). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carter, J. G., & Sherriff, G. (2011). Spatial planning for climate change adaptation: Identifying cross cutting barriers and solutions. Manchester: University of Manchester, Centre for Urban and Regional Ecology.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J., & Stewart, I. (1994). The collapse of chaos: Discovering simplicity in a complex world. London: Penguin Group Ltd.Google Scholar
  12. Commonwealth of Australia (2007). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Canberra: Australian Government/Australian Public Service Commission.Google Scholar
  13. Cooperrider, D.L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry, A POSITIVE revolution in change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Cooperrider, D.L., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J.M. (2008). Appreciative inquiry handbook, for leaders of change, (2nd ed.). San Francisco/Brunswick, OH: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc./Crown Custom Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Davoudi, S., Crawford, J., & Mehmood, A. (2010). Climate change and spatial planning responses. In S. Davoudi, J. Crawford, & A. Mehmood (Eds.), Planning for climate change: strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  17. De Jong, T. M., & van der Voordt, D. J. M. (Eds.). (2005). Ways to study and research urban, architectural and technical design. Amsterdam: IOP Press BV.Google Scholar
  18. De Jonge, J.M. (2009). Landscape architecture between politics and science, an integrative perspective on landscape planning and design in the network society. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Blauwdruk/Techne Press.Google Scholar
  19. De Pater, F., Pijnappels, M., & van Steenis, O. (2011). Ondersoeksresultaten: Klimaatscenario’s, mitigatie, adaptatie, integratie, communicatie. Amsterdam: Programmabureau Klimaat voor Ruimte.Google Scholar
  20. Dessai, S., & Hulme, M. (2004). Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities? Climate Policy, 4(2), 107–128.Google Scholar
  21. Ferrance, E. (2000). Action research. Providence: Brown University.Google Scholar
  22. Fuenfgeld, H., & McEvoy, D. (2011). Framing climate change adaptation in policy and practice. Melbourne: VCCCAR.Google Scholar
  23. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  24. Godschalk, D. R., & Brower, D. J. (1989). Catastrophic coastal storms: Development management and hazard mitigation. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Godschalk, D., Beatley, T., Berke, P., Brower, D., & Kaiser, E. J. (1999). Natural hazard mitigation: Recasting disaster policy and planning. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hirschemöller, M., & Hoppe, R. (1995). Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis, knowledge and policy. The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, 8, 40–60.Google Scholar
  27. Horstmann, B. (2008). Framing adaptation to climate change: A challenge for building institutions. Bonn: DIE Discussion Paper/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik 23/2008.Google Scholar
  28. IPCC. (2001). Climate change 2001: Synthesis report. A contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: R. T. Watson, & the Core Writing Team (Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 398 p.Google Scholar
  29. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis, working group I contribution to the intergovernmental panel on climate change fourth assessment report. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, R. (2010). A risk management approach to climate change adaptation. In R. A. C. Nottage, D. S. Wratt, J. F. Bornman, & K. Jones (Eds.), Climate change adaptation in New Zealand: Future scenarios and some sectoral perspectives (pp. 10–25). Wellington: New Zealand Climate Change Centre.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, R. (2011). Planning with plasticine. Retrieved November 30, 2011 from http://2risk.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/planning-with-plasticine/.Google Scholar
  32. King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Langton, C.G., Taylor, C., Farmer, J.D., & Rasmussen, S. (1992). Artificial life II. In: Santa Fe Institute Studies in the sciences of complexity Proceedings, vol. 10. Redwood City: Santa Fe Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Lazarus, R. (2009). Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1053–1233.Google Scholar
  35. Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “Muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mack, S.K., Day, J. W., Lane, R., Englande, A. J., Reimers, R. S., Groby, J., & Austin, G. C. (2010). Wetland assimilation: A case study of climate change mitigation and adaptation in New Orleans. In Proceedings 2010 International Climate Change Adaptation Conference, 29 June–1 July 2010, Gold Coast.Google Scholar
  37. March, A., & Holland, M. (2011). Fire penetration and the Australian suburb. In: Proceedings of the thirdWorld Planning Schools Congress, Perth, 4–8 July 2011.Google Scholar
  38. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Mitchell Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity. The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  40. NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center (2011). Paleoclimate record points toward potential rapid climate changes. Science Daily. Retrieved December 17, 2011 from http://www.sciencedaily.com-/releases/2011/12/111208173647.htm?utm_source = dlvr.it&utm_medium = twitterGoogle Scholar
  41. Newman, P., & Boyer, H. (2009). Resilient cities: Responding to peak oil and climate change. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  42. O’Brien, G., O’Keefe, P., Meena, H., Rose, J., & Wilson, L. (2008). Climate adaptation from a poverty perspective. Climate Policy, 8(2), 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., & Hanson, C. E. (Eds.). (2007). Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. PBL, KNMI, & WUR. (2009). News in climate science and exploring boundaries, apolicy brief on developments since the IPCC AR4 report in 2007. Bilthoven: PBL Publication number 500114013.Google Scholar
  45. Pohl, C., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2006). Gestaltungsprinzipien für die Transdisziplinäre Forschung: ein Beitrag des td-net. München: oekom.Google Scholar
  46. Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Schellnhuber, H. J., Alcamo, J., Barker, T., Kammen, D. M., et al. (2009). Climate change—synthesis report: Global risks, challenges and decisions, Copenhagen 2009. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  47. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Inc. (reprinted in Cross, N. (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 135–144). Chichester: Wiley, 1984).Google Scholar
  48. Roggema, R. (2005). Hansje Brinker, take your finger away. In: Proceedings Oxford Futures Forum (OFF2005) September 2005, Oxford.Google Scholar
  49. Roggema, R. (2008a). De kust van Groningen. Hotspot Klimaatbestendig Groningen, Groningen. Amsterdam: Provincie Groningen en Klimaat voor Ruimte.Google Scholar
  50. Roggema, R. (2008b). The use of spatial planning to increase the resilience for future turbulence in the spatial system of the Groningen region to deal with climate change. In: Proceedings UKSS-conference, September 2008, Oxford.Google Scholar
  51. Roggema, R. (2009a). Adaptation to climate change: A spatial challenge. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roggema, R. (Ed.). (2009b). INCREASE II (International Conference on Renewable Energy Approaches for the Spatial Environment); Proceedings Increase II. Groningen: Province of Groningen and Beijing, UIBE.Google Scholar
  53. Roggema, R. (2009c). Design, hotspot climate proof groningen, final report. Groningen: Province of Groningen and Climate Changes Spatial Planning.Google Scholar
  54. Roggema, R. (2009d). Adaptation to climate change, does spatial planning help? Swarm planning does! In: Proceedings Ravage of the Planet., Cape Town.Google Scholar
  55. Roggema, R. (2010). Anticipative planning for future circumstances: The Groningen experience and the development of the swarm planning concept. In: Proceedings 2010 International Climate Change Adaptation Conference, 29 June–1 July 2010, Gold Coast.Google Scholar
  56. Roggema, R. (2011). Swarming landscapes, new pathways for resilient cities. In: Proceedings fourth International Urban Design Conference. Resilience in Urban Design. Surfers Paradise.Google Scholar
  57. Roggema, R. (2012a). Developing a planning theory for wicked problems: Swarm planning. In A. Van den Dobbelsteen & S. Stremke (Eds.), Sustainable energy landscapes: Designing, planning, and development. Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  58. Roggema, R. (2012b). Developing a planning theory for wicked problems: Swarm planning. In: Proceedings fourth International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Built Environments, Sao Paulo, 28–30 June 2012.Google Scholar
  59. Roggema, R., van den Dobbelsteen, A., & Stegenga, K. (2006). Pallet of possibilities. Groningen: Grounds for Change.Google Scholar
  60. Roggema, R., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2007). About how was becomes: Emergence of a sustainable spatial-energy system. In: Proceedings Ravage of the Planet, December 2007, Bariloche.Google Scholar
  61. Roggema, R., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2008). Swarm planning: Development of a new planning paradigm, which improves the capacity of regional spatial systems to adapt to climate change. In: Proceedings World Sustainable Building Conference (SB08). September 2008, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  62. Roggema, R., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2009). Climate adaptation and regional planning in Groningen province. In: Proceedings SASBE 09, June 2009, Delft.Google Scholar
  63. Roggema, R., Middleton, L., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2009). Quadruple the potential. In: Proceedings PLEA 09, June 2009, Quebec.Google Scholar
  64. Roggema, R., Vermeend, T., Kabat, P., &, van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2011a). To B or not to B, transformation of spatial systems. In: Proceedings Resilience 2011, March 2011, Tempe.Google Scholar
  65. Roggema, R., Kabat, P., van den Dobbelsteen, A., & Keenan, R. (2011b). The swarm and the plan, spatial resilience for climate change. In: Proceedings Resilience 2011, March 2011, Tempe.Google Scholar
  66. Roggema, R., van den Dobbelsteen, A., Biggs, C., & Timmermans, W. (2011). Planning for climate change or: how wicked problems shape the new paradigm of swarm planning. In: Conference on Proceedings of the thirdConference on Proceedings of the third World Planning Schools Congress, July 2011, Perth.Google Scholar
  67. Roggema, R., van den Dobbelsteen, A., Stremke, S., & Mallon, W. (2011). Spatial-energy framework aiming at breakthroughs brings goals beyond policy objectives within reach. In: A.J. Jenkins (Ed.), Climate change adaptation: Ecology, mitigation and management. Climate Change and its Causes, Effects and Prediction-Series (pp. 127–150). New York: NOVA Publishers.Google Scholar
  68. Roggema, R., Martin, J. & Horne R. (2011c). Sharing the climate adaptive dream: the benefits of the charrette approach. In: P. Dalziel (Ed.), Proceedings ANZRSAI conference, 6–9 December 2011, Canberra.Google Scholar
  69. Roggema, R., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2011). Swarm planning: A unified approach dealing with the two sides of climate change. In: Proceedings World Sustainable Building Conference (SB11), October 2011, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  70. Roggema, R., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2012). Swarm planning for climate change: An alternative pathway for resilience. Journal for Building Research and Information 40 (5), 606–624.Google Scholar
  71. Roggema, R., van den Dobbelsteen, A., & Kabat, P. (2012a). Towards a spatial planning framework for climate adaptation. SASBE, 1(1), 29–58.Google Scholar
  72. Roggema, R., Vermeend, T., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2012b). Incremental change, transition or transformation? Optimising change pathways for climate adaptation in spatial planning. Sustainability, 4, 2525–2549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schipper, E. L. F., & Burton, I. (Eds.). (2009). The earthscan reader on adaptation to climate change. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  74. Schön, D. (1983). The reflexive practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  75. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflexive practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  76. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., & Wandel, J. (2000). An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Climatic Change, 45(1), 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sommerkorn, M., & Hassol, S. J. (Eds.) (2009). Arctic climate feedbacks: Global implications. Oslo: WWF International Arctic Programme.Google Scholar
  78. Srivastva, S., & Cooperrider, D. L. (Eds.). (1999). Appreciative management and leadership: The power of positive thought and action in organisation (Rev ed.). Euclid: Lakeshore Communications.Google Scholar
  79. Stremke, S., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (Eds.). (2012). Sustainable Energy Landscapes. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  80. Tin, T. (2008). Climate change: Faster, stronger, sooner, an overview of the climate science published since the UN IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Brussels: WWF European Policy Office.Google Scholar
  81. Van der Heijden, K. (1996). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  82. Van der Heijden, K. (1997). Scenarios, strategies and the strategy process. Nyenrode research papers series 1997-01 Breukelen: Nyenrode Business University.Google Scholar
  83. Vanstiphout, W. (2000). Cultuur als confrontatie. Ruimtelijke Ordening als onderdeel van het cultuurbeleid. Den Haag: SDU, Ministerie van OC&W.Google Scholar
  84. VROM-raad. (2007). De hype voorbij, klimaatverandering als structureel ruimtelijk vraagstuk; advies 060. Den Haag: VROM-raad.Google Scholar
  85. Wilson, E. (2009). Use of scenarios for climate change adaptation in spatial planning. In S. Davoudi, J. Crawford, & A. Mehmood (Eds.), Planning for climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  86. Winter, R. (1989). Learning from experience: Principles and practice in action-research. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  87. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  88. Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Action research in higher education. London: Kogan Page Limited.Google Scholar

Websites

  1. www.resilience2011.org. Accessed 10 December 2011.
  2. www.wpsc2011.com.au. Accessed 11 December 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArchitectureDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations