Abstract
The chapters in this volume show that a Nordic model can constitute a delicate balance between traditional values, institutionalised practices and contemporary, neoliberal forms of governance and policies. Along with new institutional theory, we also argue that social technologies are being interpreted in different ways in actual school practices. This process of translating national regulations into internal sense builds on the values in the culture to which they are introduced.
The Nordic countries share a deep, common cultural heritage with basic values of democracy, justice and equality. At the system level, the structural patterns of a school for all have been the same in all countries since the reforms after World War II. We find more differences among the countries in terms of realising a school for all. One of the discourses is how to include and differentiate children by abilities. Varieties of decoupling strategies have been identified, and consequently the need for special education also differs. These chapters also show that neoliberal technologies affect the Nordic model in different ways. The regulative position of a school for all is probably strengthened in terms of individual rights. Choice, privatisation, control and a strong emphasis on learning outcomes probably promote greater social differences. Nevertheless, it may be argued from a new institutional perspective that the main structures of the Nordic educational model will sustain as long as the deeply rooted Nordic culture survives in the globalised society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cuban, L. (1996). Curriculum stability and change. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 216–247). New York: Macmillan.
Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, B. (2006). Institutional analysis and the study of education. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 1–13). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Røvik, K. A. (2007). Trender og translasjoner. Ideer som former det 21. århundrets organisasjon [Trends and translations. Ideas that forms the 21st century’s organisation]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations. Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Spillane, J., & Burch, P. (2006). The institutional environment and instructional practice: Changing patterns of guidance and control in public education. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 1–13). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012). Understanding policy borrowing and lending. Building comparative policy studies. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2012. Policy borrowing and lending in education (pp. 3–17). London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blossing, U., Imsen, G., Moos, L. (2014). Schools for All: A Nordic Model. In: Blossing, U., Imsen, G., Moos, L. (eds) The Nordic Education Model. Policy Implications of Research in Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7125-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7125-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7124-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7125-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)