Abstract
The contribution of forest biotechnology to the future of our global forests is explored. Questions relating to how forest biotechnology can most appropriately fully contribute to achieving sustainable development goals in the light of REDD + and the United Nations Rio + 20 developments are raised. Opportunities for international support for preservation of old growth forest areas, whilst allowing for other areas to be semi-managed, or used for high density plantation forestry are discussed. The role of ‘trees of technology’ using modified practices or genetic components in tree breeding are described, with reference to future energy, pulp, food and construction uses. The crucial role of biotechnology in conserving forest biodiversity and uniquely valuable tree genotypes is evaluated. The current and future potential for leading edge biotechnological breakthroughs in manipulating rapid growth, extending geographical ranges, developmental control of flowering, carbohydrate commitment, ‘omics technologies and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses are explored. The ability of forest biotechnology to contribute to delivering economic, societal and environmental benefits globally is discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barakat A, DiLoreto DS, Zhang Y, Smith C, Baier K, Powell WA, Wheeler N, Sederoff R, Carlson JE (2009) Comparison of the transcriptomes of American chestnut (castanea dentata) and Chinese chestnut (castanea mollissima) in response to the chestnut blight infection. BMC Plant Biol 9:51
Baxter I, Dilkes BP (2012) Elemental profiles reflect plant adaptations to the environment. Science 336:1661–1663
Bohmert K (2000) Transgenic Arabidopsis can accumulate polyhydroxybutyrate to up to 4% of their fresh weight. Planta 211:841–845
Bonetta L (2008) Epigenomics: detailed analysis. Nature 454:795–798
Burg K, Helmersson A, Bozhkow P, von Arnold S (2007) Developmental and genetic variation in nuclear microsatellite stability during somatic embryogenesis in pine. J Exp Bot 58:687–698
Dalton DA, Ma C, Murthy GS, Strauss SH (2012) Bioplastic production by transgenic poplar. Information Systems for Biotechnology News Report (Jan) 7–10
DiFazio SP, Leonardi S, Slavov GT, Garman SL, Adams WT, Strauss SH (2012) Gene flow and simulation of transgenic dispersal from hybrid poplar plantations. New Phytologist 193:903–915
ENCODE Project Consortium (2012) An integrated encyclopaedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489:57–74
Feng S, Cokus SJ, Zhang X, Chen P-Y, Bostick M, Goll MG, Hetzel J, Jain J, Strauss SH, Halpern ME, Ukomadu C, Sadler KC, Pradhan S, Pellerini M, Jacobsen SE (2010) Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8689–8694
Fenning TM, Gartland KMA (2007) Why forests matter. Prospect 133:17–18
Fenning TM, Walter C, Gartland KMA (2008) Forest biotech and climate change. Nat Biotechnol 26:615–617
Gartland KMA, Gartland JS (2004) Biotechnology applied to conservation, insects and diseases. In: Kellison R, McCord S, Gartland KMA (eds) Forest biotechnology in Latin America. Institute of Forest Biotechnology, North Carolina, pp 109–116
Gartland KMA, McHugh AT, Crow RM, Garg A, Gartland JS (2005) Biotechnological progress in dealing with Dutch Elm disease. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 41:364–367
Gatica-Arias AM, Arrieta-espinoza G, Espinoza-Esquivel AM (2008) Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis and optimisation of genetic transformation in coffee (coffea Arabica L.) cvs. Caturra and catuai. Electron J Biotechnol 11(1):9
Ghildiyal M, Zamore PD (2009) Small silencing RNAs: an expanding universe. Nat Rev Genet 10:94–108
Hirsch R (2012) Blight resistance: it’s in the DNA. J Am Chestnut Found 26:20–22
Hofstad O, Kohlin G, Namaala J (2009) How can emissions from woodfuel be reduced? In: Angelsen A (ed) Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options. CIFOR, Bogor
Huckabee Smith A (2012) Breeding for resistance: TACF and the Burnham hypothesis. J Am Chestnut Found 26:11–15
Kremer A, Vincenti B, Alia R, Burczyk J, Cavers S, Degen B, Finkeldey R, Fluch S, Gomory D, Gugerli F, Koelwijn HP, Koskela J, Lefevre F, Morgante M, Mueller-Starck G, Plomion C, Taylor G, Turok J, Savolainen O, Ziegenhagen B (2011) Forest ecosystem genomics and adaptation. Tree Genet Genomes 7:869–875
Ma J, He Y, Wu C, Liu H, Hu Z, Sun G (2012) Cloning and molecular characterization of a SERK gene transcriptionally induced during somatic embryogenesis Ananas comusus cv. Shenwan. Plant Mol Biol Report 30:195–203
Newhouse AE, Kaczmar NS, Powell WA, Maynard CA (2009) American elm. In: Kole C, Hall TC (eds) A compendium of transgenic plants. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 241–262
Novaes E, Kirst M, Chiang V, Winter-Sederoff H, Sederoff R (2010) Lignin and biomass: a negative correlation for wood formation and lignin content in trees. Plant Physiol 154:555–561
Perez-Nunez MT, Souza R, Saenz L, Chan JL, Zuniga-Aguillar JJ, Oropreza C (2009) Detection of a SERK-like gene in coconut and analysis of its expression during the formation of embryogenic callus and somatic embryos. Plant Cell Rep 28:11–19
Phelps J, Webb EL, Agrawal A (2010) Does REDD + threaten to recentralise forest governance? Science 328:312–313
Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Troggio M, Gleave A, Salvi S, Chagne D, Cestaro A, Kumar S, Crowhurst RN, Gardiner SE (2012) Apple, from genome to breeding. Tree Genet Genomes 8:509–529
United Nations (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. General Assembly Resolution 42/187, 11 December, 1987
Vining KJ, Pomraning KR, Wilhelm LJ, Priest HD, Pellegrini M, Mockler TC, Freitag M, Strauss SH (2012) Dynamic DNA cytosine methylation in the Populus trichocarpa genome: tissue-level variation and relationship to gene expression. Biomed Cent Genom 13:27
Viswanath V, Albrechtsen BR, Strauss SH (2012) Global regulatory burden for field testing of genetically modified trees. Tree Genet Genomes 8:221–226
Wegrzyn JL, Main D, Figueroa B, Choi M, Yu J, Neale DB, Jung S, Lee T, Stanton M, Zheng P, Ficklin S, Cho I, Peace C, Evans K, Volk G, Oraguzie N, Chen C, Olmstead M, Gmitter G Jr, Abbott AG (2012) Uniform standards for genome databases in forest and fruit trees. Tree Genet Genomes 8:549–557
Zagrai I, Capote N, Ravelonandro M, Cambra M, Zagrai L, Scorza R (2008) Plum pox virus silencing of C5 transgenic plums is stable under challenge inoculation with heterologous viruses. J Plant Pathol 90:63–71
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gartland, K.M.A., Gartland, J.S. (2014). Forest Biotechnology Futures. In: Fenning, T. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities for the World's Forests in the 21st Century. Forestry Sciences, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7076-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7076-8_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7075-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7076-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)