Skip to main content

4D Numerical Analysis of Scaffolds: A New Approach

  • Chapter
Tissue Engineering

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 31))

Abstract

A large range of biodegradable polymers are used to produce scaffolds for tissue engineering, which temporarily replace the biomechanical functions of a biologic tissue while it progressively regenerates its capacities. However, the mechanical behavior of biodegradable materials during its degradation, which is an important aspect of the scaffold design, is still an unexplored subject. For a biodegradable scaffold, performance will decrease along its degradation, ideally in accordance to the regeneration of the biologic tissue, avoiding the stress shielding effect or the premature rupture. In this chapter, a new numerical approach to predict the mechanical behavior of complex 3D scaffolds during degradation time (the 4th dimension) is presented. The degradation of mechanical properties should ideally be compatible to the tissue regeneration. With this new approach, an iterative process of optimization is possible to achieve an ideal solution in terms of mechanical behavior and degradation time. The scaffold can therefore be pre-validated in terms of functional compatibility. An example of application of this approach is demonstrated at the end of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aslan S, Calandrelli L, Laurienzo P, Malinconico M, Migliares C (2000) Poly(d,l-lactic ac-id)/poly(caprolactone) blend membranes: preparation and morphological characterization. J Mater Sci 35:1615–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Auras R, Harte B, Selke S (2004) An overview of polylactides as packaging materials. Macromol Biosci 4:835–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bastin G, Dochain D (1990) On-line estimation and adaptative control of bioreactor. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bellenger V, Ganem M, Mortaigne B, Verdu J (1995) Lifetime prediction in the hydrolytic age-ing of polyesters. Polym Degrad Stab 49:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bikiaris D, Papageorgiou G, Achilias D, Pavlidou E, Stergiou A (2007) Miscibility and enzymatic degradation studies of poly(e-caprolactone)/poly(propylene succinate) blends. Eur Polym J 43:2491–2503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen G-Q, Wu Q (2005) Review: the application of polyhydroxyalkanoates as tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials 26:6565–6578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chu CC (1985) Strain-accelerated hydrolytic degradation of synthetic absorbable sutures. In: Hall CW (ed) Surgical research, recent developments: proceedings of the first annual scientific session of the Academy of Surgical Research. Pergamon Press, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  8. Colombo A, Karvouni E (2000) Biodegradable stents: fulfilling the mission and stepping away. Circulation 102:371–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Endo M, Aida T, Inoue A (1987) Immortal polymerization of e-caprolactone initiated by aluminum porphyrin in the presence of alcohol. Macromolecules 20:2982–2988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fan LT, Lee Y (1983) Kinetic studies of enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose: derivation of a mechanistic kinetic model. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:2707–2733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fan LT, Lee Y, Beardmore DH (1980) Major chemical and physical features of cellulosic materials as substrates for enzymatic hydrolysis. Adv Biochem Eng 14:101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farrar DF, Gilson RK (2002) Hydrolytic degradation of polyglyconate B: the relationship between degradation time, strength and molecular weight. Biomaterials 23:3905–3912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garlotta DA (2001) Literature review of poly(latic acid). J Polym Environ 9:63–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Göpferich A (1996) Mechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion. Biomaterials 17:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Göpferich A, Langer R (1993) Modeling of polymer erosion. Macromolecules 26:4105–4112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grizzi I, Garreau H, Li S, Vert M (1995) Hydrolytic degradation of devices based on poly[DL-lactic acid size-dependence. Biomaterials 16:305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Han X, Pan J (2009) A model for simultaneous crystallization and biodegradation of biodegradable polymers. Biomaterials 30:423–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Herzog K, Müller R-J, Deckwer W-D (2006) Mechanism and kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis of polyester nanoparticles by lipases. Polym Degrad Stab 91:2486–2498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hill CG (1977) An introduction to chemical engineering kinetics and reactor design. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kennedy JF, Melo EHM (1990) Bioconversions of cellulose—a major source of material for the biochemical industry. Br Polym J 23:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kirby AJ (1972) Hydrolysis and formation of esters of organic acids. In: Bamford CH, Tipper CFH (eds) Comprehensive chemical kinetics, ester formation and hydrolysis and related reactions. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klyosov AA, Rabinowitch M (1980) Enzymatic conversion of cellulose to glucose: present state of the art and potential. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krynauw H, Bruchmüller L, Bezuidenhout D, Zilla P, Franz T (2011) Constitutive modelling of degradation induced mechanical changes in a polyester-urethane scaffold for soft tissue regeneration. In: Fernandes PR et al. (eds) Proceedings of II international conference on tissue engineering. Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  24. Levenberg S, Langer R (2004) Advances in tissue engineering. In: Schatten GP (ed) Current topics in developemental biology. Elsevier, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li SM, Garreau H, Vert M (1990) Structure-property relationships in the case of the degradation of massive aliphatic poly(α-hydroxyacids) in aqueous media. Part 3: Influence of the morphology of poly(L-lactic acid). J Mater Sci, Mater Med 1:198–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lunt J (1998) Large-scale production, properties and applications of polylatic acid polymers. Polym Degrad Stab 59:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lyu SP, Sparer R, Untereker D (2005) Analytical solutions to mathematical models of the surface and bulk erosion of solid polymers. J Polym Sci, Part B 43:383–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Meek M, Jansen K, Steendam R, van Oeveren W, van Wachem P, van Luyn M (2004) In vitro degradation and biocompatibility of poly(DL-lactide-ε-caprolactone) nerve guides. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 68:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Metzmacher I, Radu F, Bause M, Knabner P, Friess W (2007) A model describing the effect of enzymatic degradation on drug release from collagen minirods. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 67:349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller ND, Williams DF (1984) The in vivo and in vitro degradation of poly(glycolic acid) suture material as a function of applied strain. Biomaterials 5:365–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Morrison RT, Boyd RN (1992) Organic chemistry. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2007) Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 32:762–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nikolic MS, Poleti D, Djonlagic J (2003) Synthesis and characterization of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene fumarate)s. Eur Polym J 39:2183–2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pitt GG, Gratzl MM, Kimmel GL, Surles J, Sohindler A (1982) Aliphatic polyesters II. The degradation of poly(d,l-lactide), poly(e-caprolactone), and their copolymers in vivo. Biomaterials 2:215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saha SK, Tsuji H (2009) Enhanced crystallization of poly(L lactide-co-ε caprolactone) in the presence of water. J Appl Polym Sci 112:715–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Seretoudi G, Bikiaris D, Panayiotou C (2002) Synthesis, characterization and biodegradability of poly(ethylene succinate)/poly(e-caprolactone) block copolymers. Polymer 43:5405–5415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen-Guo W, Bo Q (1992) Polycaprolactone–poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymer, I: Synthesis and degradability in vitro. Polym Adv Technol 4:363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Siparsky GL, Voorhees KJ, Miao F (1998) Hydrolysis of polylactic acid (PLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) in aqueous acetonitrile solutions: autocatalysis. J Environ Polym Degrad 6:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Soares JS, Rajagopal KR, Moore JE (2010) Deformation induced hydrolysis of a degradable polymeric cylindrical annulus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Södergard A, Stolt M (2002) Properties of lactic acid based polymers and their correlation with composition. Prog Polym Sci 27:1123–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sykes P (1975) A guidebook to mechanism in organic chemistry. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tamela TL, Talja M (2003) Biodegradable urethral stents. BJU Int 92:843–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Therin M, Christel P, Li SM, Garreau H, Vert M (1992) In vivo degradation of massive poly(a-hydroxyacids): validation of in vitro findings. Biomaterials 13:594–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tokiwa Y, Suzuki T (1977) Hydrolysis of polyesters by lipase. Nature 270:76–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tsuji H, Ikada Y (1998) Properties and morphology of poly(L-lactide). II. Hydrolysis in alkaline solution. J Polym Sci, Part A 36:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tsuji H, Ikada Y (2000) Properties and morphology of poly(L-lactide) 4. Effects of structural parameters on long-term hydrolysis of poly(L-lactide) in phosphate-buffered solution. Polym Degrad Stab 67:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tsuji H, Nakahara K (2001) Poly(L-lactide)—IX hydrolysis in acid media. J Appl Polym Sci 86:186–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tzafriri AR, Bercovier M, Parnas H (2002) Reaction diffusion model of enzymatic erosion of insoluble fibrillar matrices. Biophys J 83:776–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Van Krevelen DW (1976) Properties of polymers. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vert M, Li S, Garreau H (1991) More about the degradation of LA/GA-derived matrices in aqueous media. J Control Release 16:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vieira AC, Guedes RM, Marques AT (2009) Development of ligament tissue biodegradable devices: a review. J Biomech 42:2421–2430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Vieira AC, Marques AT, Guedes RM, Tita V (2011) Material model proposal for biodegrada-ble materials. Proc Eng 10:1597–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Vieira AC, Vieira JC, Ferra JM, Magalhães FD, Guedes RM, Marques AT (2011) Mechanical study of PLA–PCL fibres during in vitro degradation. J Mech Behav Biomed 4:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. von Burkersroda F, Schedl L, Göpferich A (2002) Why biodegradable polymers undergo surface or bulk erosion. Biomaterials 23:4221–4231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Walker LP, Wilson DB (1991) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: an overview. Bioresour Technol 36:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang Y, Pan J, Han X, Sinka C, Ding L (2008) A phenomenological model for the degradation of biodegradable polymers. Biomaterials 29:3393–3401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ward I (1983) Mechanical properties of solid polymers. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yu R, Chen H, Chen T, Zhou X (2008) Modeling and simulation of drug release from multi-layer biodegradable polymer microstructure in three dimensions. Simul Model Pract Theory 16:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang X, Espiritu M, Bilyk A, Kurniawan L (2008) Morphological behaviour of poly(lactic acid) during hydrolytic degradation. Polym Degrad Stab 93:1964–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors Vieira A. and Guedes R.M. would like to thank the FCT (Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation) for financial support under the grants PTDC/EME-PME/70155/2006 and PTDC/EME-PME/114808/2009. Tita V. would like to thank FAPESP (Research Foundation of State of São Paulo) for financial support under the grant 09/00544-5. The authors would like to highlight that this work was also partially supported by the Program USP/UP, which is a scientific cooperation agreement established between the University of Porto (Portugal) and the University of São Paulo (Brazil).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Vieira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vieira, A.C., Marques, A.T., Guedes, R.M., Tita, V. (2014). 4D Numerical Analysis of Scaffolds: A New Approach. In: Fernandes, P., Bartolo, P. (eds) Tissue Engineering. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7073-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7073-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7072-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7073-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics