Skip to main content

Constitutive Effects of Hydrolytic Degradation in Electro-Spun Polyester-Urethane Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Regeneration

  • Chapter
Tissue Engineering

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 31))

  • 1818 Accesses

Abstract

In tissue regenerative implants, porosity allowing the ingrowth of cells and tissue is a key factor for the long-term success. While vital for healing and tissue regeneration, the use of highly porous structures may adversely affect the mechanical properties of the scaffold, in particular when viscoelastic polymeric materials are used. In the case of biodegradable scaffold materials, the effect of the degradation process on mechanical and structural properties of the scaffold is yet another aspect to be considered. Both tissue ingrowth and biodegradation are concurrent transient processes which change the mechanical and structural properties of the implanted device over time. Ingrowth of cells and tissue typically results in an increase in structural stiffness whereas scaffold degradation leads to loss of mechanical properties and potentially to structural disintegration. The aim of the research presented in this chapter was the investigation of the change of mechanical properties of a biodegradable, electro-spun polyester-urethane scaffold for soft tissue regeneration during hydrolytic degradation and the development of a constitutive model that is suitable for capturing these changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Furth ME, Atala A, Van Dyke ME (2007) Smart biomaterials design for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials 28(34):5068–5073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams DF (2006) To engineer is to create: the link between engineering and regeneration. Trends Biotechnol 24(1):4–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zilla P, Bezuidenhout D, Human P (2007) Prosthetic vascular grafts: wrong models, wrong questions and no healing. Biomaterials 28(34):5009–5027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bezuidenhout D, Davies N, Zilla P (2002) Effect of well defined dodecahedral porosity on inflammation and angiogenesis. ASAIO J 48(5):465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davies N, Dobner S, Bezuidenhout D, Schmidt C, Beck M, Zisch AH et al. (2008) The dosage dependence of VEGF stimulation on scaffold neovascularisation. Biomaterials 29(26):3531–3538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hou Q, Grijpma DW, Feijen J (2003) Porous polymeric structures for tissue engineering prepared by a coagulation, compression moulding and salt leaching technique. Biomaterials 24(11):1937–1947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoon JJ, Park TG (2001) Degradation behaviors of biodegradable macroporous scaffolds prepared by gas foaming of effervescent salts. J Biomed Mater Res 55(3):401–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarkar S, Burriesci G, Wojcik A, Aresti N, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM (2009) Manufacture of small calibre quadruple lamina vascular bypass grafts using a novel automated extrusion-phase-inversion method and nanocomposite polymer. J Biomech 42(6):722–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guan J, Fujimoto KL, Sacks MS, Wagner WR (2005) Preparation and characterization of highly porous, biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for soft tissue applications. Biomaterials 26(18):3961–3971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McClure MJ, Sell SA, Simpson DG, Walpoth BH, Bowlin GL (2010) A three-layered electrospun matrix to mimic native arterial architecture using polycaprolactone, elastin, and collagen: a preliminary study. Acta Biomater 6(7):2422–2433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ayres CE, Bowlin GL, Henderson SC, Taylor L, Shultz J, Alexander J, Telemeco TA, Simpson DG (2006) Modulation of anisotropy in electrospun tissue-engineering scaffolds: analysis of fiber alignment by the fast Fourier transform. Biomaterials 27(32):5524–5534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Riboldi SA, Sampaolesi M, Neuenschwander P, Cossu G, Mantero S (2005) Electrospun degradable polyesterurethane membranes: potential scaffolds for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26(22):4606–4615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast 61(1–3):1–48

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Shadwick RE (1999) Mechanical design in arteries. J Exp Biol 202(Pt 23):3305–3313

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steinman DA, Vorp DA, Ethier CR (2003) Computational modeling of arterial biomechanics: insights into pathogenesis and treatment of vascular disease. J Vasc Surg 37(5):1118–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yeoman MS, Reddy BD, Bowles H, Zilla P, Bezuidenhout D, Franz T (2009) The use of finite element methods and genetic algorithms in search of an optimal fabric reinforced porous graft system. Ann Biomed Eng 37(11):2266–2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zidi M, Cheref M (2003) Mechanical analysis of a prototype of small diameter vascular prosthesis: Numerical simulations. Comput Biol Med 33(1):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Di Prima M, Gall K, McDowell DL, Guldberg R, Lin A, Sanderson T, Campbell D, Arzberger SC (2010) Deformation of epoxy shape memory polymer foam. Part I: Experiments and macroscale constitutive modeling. Mech Mater 42(3):304–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lendlein A, Colussi M, Neuenschwander P, Suter UW (2001) Hydrolytic degradation of phase-segregated multiblock copoly(ester urethane)s containing weak links. Macromol Chem Phys 202(13):2702–2711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lendlein A, Neuenschwander P, Suter UW (1998) Tissue-compatible multiblock copolymers for medical applications, controllable in degradation rate and mechanical properties. Macromol Chem Phys 199(12):2785–2796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwon IK, Kidoaki S, Matsuda T (2005) Electrospun nano- to microfiber fabrics made of biodegradable copolyesters: structural characteristics, mechanical properties and cell adhesion potential. Biomaterials 26(18):3929–3939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Duling RR, Dupaix RB, Katsube N, Lannutti J (2008) Mechanical characterization of electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL): a potential scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomech Eng 130(1):011006 (13 pp)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee SJ, Liu J, Oh SH, Soker S, Atala A, Yoo JJ (2008) Development of a composite vascular scaffolding system that withstands physiological vascular conditions. Biomaterials 29(19):2891–2898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vaz CM, van Tuijl S, Bouten CVC, Baaijens FPT (2005) Design of scaffolds for blood vessel tissue engineering using a multi-layering electrospinning technique. Acta Biomater 1(5):575–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mirensky TL, Fein CW, Nguyen GK, Hibino N, Sawh-Martinez RF, Yi T, McGillicuddy EA, Villalona G, Shinoka T, Breuer CK (2009) Characterization of small-diameter electrospun tissue-engineered arterial grafts. J Am Coll Surg 209(3):S30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kang Y, Yao Y, Yin G, Huang Z, Liao X, Xu X, Zhao G (2009) A study on the in vitro degradation properties of poly(l-lactic acid)/[beta]-tricalcium phosphate(PLLA/[beta]-TCP) scaffold under dynamic loading. Med Eng Phys 31(5):589–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Henry JA, Simonet M, Pandit A, Neuenschwander P (2007) Characterization of a slowly degrading biodegradable polyesterurethane for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 82A(3):669–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonchek LI (1980) Prevention of endothelial damage during preparation of saphenous veins for bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 79(6):911–915

    Google Scholar 

  29. Milleret V, Simonet M, Bittermann AG, Neuenschwander P, Hall H (2009) Cyto- and hemocompatibility of a biodegradable 3d-scaffold material designed for medical applications. J Biomed Mater Res, Part B, Appl Biomater 91(1):109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ayres CE, Jha BS, Meredith H, Bowman JR, Bowlin GL, Henderson SC, Simpson DG (2008) Measuring fiber alignment in electrospun scaffolds: a user’s guide to the 2d fast Fourier transform approach. J Biomater Sci Polymer Ed 19(5):603–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ayres CE, Bowlin GL, Pizinger R, Taylor LT, Keen CA, Simpson DG (2007) Incremental changes in anisotropy induce incremental changes in the material properties of electrospun scaffolds. Acta Biomater 3(5):651–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. van der Merwe H, Reddy BD, Zilla P, Bezuidenhout D, Franz T (2008) A computational study of knitted nitinol meshes for their prospective use as external vein reinforcement. J Biomech 41(6):1302–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Carew EO, Barber JE, Vesely I (2000) Role of preconditioning and recovery time in repeated testing of aortic valve tissues: validation through quasilinear viscoelastic theory. Ann Biomed Eng 28(9):1093–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Valdez-Jasso D, Bia D, Zócalo Y, Armentano R, Haider M, Olufsen M (2011) Linear and nonlinear viscoelastic modeling of aorta and carotid pressure–area dynamics under in vivo and ex vivo conditions. Ann Biomed Eng 39(5):1438–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yeoman MS, Reddy D, Bowles HC, Bezuidenhout D, Zilla P, Franz T (2010) A constitutive model for the warp-weft coupled non-linear behavior of knitted biomedical textiles. Biomaterials 31(32):8484–8493

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank ab medica S.p.A for donating the DegraPol® material for this study. ETH Zurich and University of Zurich are owners and ab medica S.p.A is exclusive licensee of all IP Rights of DegraPol®.

Funding Sources

This study was supported financially by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa. Any opinion, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and therefore the NRF does not accept any liability in regard thereto. HK received a Matching Dissertation Grant from the International Society of Biomechanics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Krynauw .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krynauw, H., Bruchmüller, L., Bezuidenhout, D., Zilla, P., Franz, T. (2014). Constitutive Effects of Hydrolytic Degradation in Electro-Spun Polyester-Urethane Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Regeneration. In: Fernandes, P., Bartolo, P. (eds) Tissue Engineering. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7073-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7073-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7072-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7073-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics