Abstract
I make some concluding remarks about the goals of this book: to give a clearer and more precise sense to what pluralism means in the philosophy of mathematics. A reader might adopt none, some or all of the pluralist view. There are stopping points.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
‘Teleologically satisfying answers’ are ones that reveal a sense of purpose of overall, unique goal or plan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Friend, M. (2014). Conclusion. In: Pluralism in Mathematics: A New Position in Philosophy of Mathematics. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7058-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7058-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7057-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7058-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)