Skip to main content

Theorising Crime

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Modelling Norms

Abstract

Viewing social norms from the perspective of deviant behaviour, criminological theories appealing to the social or environmental influences on crime are discussed. The focus is on three approaches, rational choice criminology, environmental criminology and sociological criminology. Two formal models of crime are reviewed: a statistical model of criminal hotspot development and a population dynamics model of crime and reoffending.

Bank robbery is an initiative of dilettantes. Real professionals open a bank. Berthold Brecht

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bandyopadhyay, S., Bhattacharya, S., & Sensarma, R. (2011). Determining crime in England and Wales: A quantile regression approach. Department of Economics Discussion Paper 11–12, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosse, T., Gerritsen, C., Hoogendoorn, M., Jaffry, S. W., & Treur, J. (2008). Comparison of agent-based and population-based simulations of displacement of crime. In International conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1991). Environmental criminology. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrabine, E., Iganski, P., Lee, M., Plummer, K., & South, N. (2004). Criminology a sociological introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, M., Barker, E. D., Tremblay, R. E., & Vitaro, F. (2006). Eysenck’s personality dimensions as predictors of male adolescent trajectories of physical aggression, theft and vandalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1309–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. V. (Ed.). (1997). Situational crime prevention. Guilderland: Harrow and Heston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice, 6, 147–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2002). Analyzing organized crime. In A. Piquero & S. G. Tibbetts (Eds.), Rational choice and criminal behavior: Recent research and future challenges (pp. 41–62). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. V. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25, 933–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1895). The rules of sociological method. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1977). Crime and personality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P. (1989). Control: Sociology’s central notion. Urbana: University of Illinoiis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand, J. L., Propper, C., & Robinson, R. (1992). The economics of social problems (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groff, E. R., & Birks, D. J. (2008). Simulating crime prevention strategies: A look at the possibilities. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 1. (0), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. E. (1998). Reflecting on the subject: A critique of the social influence conception of deterrence, the broken windows theory, and order-maintenance policing New York style. Michigan Law Review, 97, 291–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. E. (2001). Illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. E., & Ludwig, J. (2006). Broken windows: New evidence from New York city and a five-city social experiment. University of Chicago Law Review, 73, 271–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1950). Human ecology: A theory of community structures. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkely: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, S. (1951). The conflict of values in denlinquency areas. American Sociological Review, 16, 653–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., & Eck, J. (Eds.). (2008). Artificial crime analysis systems: Using computer simulations and geographic information systems. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, B. (2002). New economics of sociological criminology. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 417–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. D. (1924). The ecological approach to the study of the human community. American Journal of Sociology, 30, 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlkop, G., & Graeff, P. (2007). How to model a rational choice theory of criminal action? Subjective expected utilities, norms, and interactions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 12, 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. (2001). Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Criminology, 39(4), 765–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, P. (2005). Crime: Economic incentives and social networks. London: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, P., Mounfield, C., & Smith, L. (2001). Non-linear modelling of burglary and violent crime in the UK. Technical report, Volterra Consulting Ltd for the Home Office UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, D. (2000). Economists, crime and punishment. In N. G. Fielding, A. Clarke, & R. Witt (Eds.), The economic dimensions of crime. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckless, W. (1961). A new theory of delinquency and crime. Federal Probation, 25, 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimke, H. (2011). The pathological approach to crime: Individually based theories. In K. Kramar (Ed.), Canadian criminology (pp. 78–92). Toronto: Pearson Education Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1931). Social factors in juvenile delinquency: A study of the community, the family, and the gang in relation to delinquent behaviour. Report of the National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement, Causes of crime, II(13). Washington, DC: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, M., & Dorsogna, M. (2008). A statistical model of criminal behavior. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 18, 1249–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, M. B., Brantingham, P. J., Bertozzi, A. L., & Tita, G. E. (2010). Dissipation and displacement of hotspots in reaction-diffusion models of crime. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107(9), 3961–3965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szakas, J., Trefftz, C., Ramirez, R., & Jefferis, E. (2008). Development of an intelligent patrol routing system using gis and computer simulations. In L. Liu & J. Eck (Eds.), Artificial crime analysis systems: Using computer simulations and geographic information systems. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taqi-Eddin, K., & Macallair, D. (1999). Shattering “broken windows”: An analysis of San Francisco’s alternative crime policies. Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, www.cjcj.org

  • Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toby, J. (1957). Social disorganization and stake in conformity: Complementary factors in the predatory behavior of hoodlums. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 48, 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P.-O. H., Oberwittler, D., Treiber, K., & Hardie, B. (2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. The Atlantic Monthly, pp. 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, A. D. (1980). Estimating the economic model of crime with individual data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 57–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17, 237–307.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elsenbroich, C., Gilbert, N. (2014). Theorising Crime. In: Modelling Norms. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7052-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics