Skip to main content

The Concept of a Routine in Segerberg’s Philosophy of Action

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Krister Segerberg on Logic of Actions

Part of the book series: Outstanding Contributions to Logic ((OCTR,volume 1))

  • 665 Accesses

Abstract

The notion of a routine for acting plays a fundamental role in Krister Segeberg’s philosophy of action and he uses it in a series of papers as the basis for the formulation of logics of intentional action. The present chapter is an attempt to provide a critical assessment of Segerberg’s program. First, an exposition of the central elements of Segerberg’s account of routines is given and its roles in his philosophy of action are discussed. It is argued that Segerberg’s notion of routines provides a very productive perspective on intentional agency and that it gives rise to a series of challenges to attempts to construct logics of intentional action. It is then argued that Segerberg’s own formal theories of intentional action do not fully meet these challenges. Finally, it is suggested a way in which the challenges can be met if the concept of a routine is brought explicitly into the semantic framework for the logic of intentions and actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Elgesem [4], p. 174.

  2. 2.

    This section is excerpted from my paper Elgesem [4].

  3. 3.

    Segerberg [6], p. 234.

  4. 4.

    Segerberg [6], pp. 234–235.

  5. 5.

    Segerberg [6], p. 235.

  6. 6.

    This section is excerpted from my paper Elgesem [4].

  7. 7.

    von Wright [9].

  8. 8.

    I argue this point in more detail in Elgesem [4].

  9. 9.

    Segerberg [7], p. 88.

References

  1. Barwise, K. J., & Seligman, J. (1997). Information flow: The logic of distributed systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bratman, M. (1987). Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson, D. (1980). ‘Causal relations’, in his essays on actions and events. New York: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elgesem, D. (1992). Intentions, actions, and routines: A problem in Krister Segerberg’s theory of action. Synthese, 85, 153–177

    Google Scholar 

  5. Segerberg, K. (1981). Action games. Acte Philosophca Fennica, 32, 220–231.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Segerberg, K. (1982). The logic of deliberate action. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11, 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Segerberg, K. (1985a). Routines. Synthese. 65(2), 185–210.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Segerberg, K. (1985b). Models for actions. In B. K. Matilal & J. L. Shaw (Eds.), Analytical philosophy in comparative perspective. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  9. von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and action. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dag Elgesem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elgesem, D. (2014). The Concept of a Routine in Segerberg’s Philosophy of Action. In: Trypuz, R. (eds) Krister Segerberg on Logic of Actions. Outstanding Contributions to Logic, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7046-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics