Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychological Motives for Car Use

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Sustainable Travel

Abstract

People buy and use cars for a range of different reasons. The (perceived) value of cars, compared to other more sustainable modes of travel, is usually described in instrumental outcomes (e.g. relative speed and cost). But cars are also useful objects for non-verbal communication of people’s achievements and identities (symbolic value) and buying and driving cars can elicit feelings of thrill, excitement, stress and embarrassment (affective value). It is argued that the relative importance of different instrumental, symbolic and affective outcomes is largely subjective and varies significantly between situations and individuals. These (perceived) outcomes can form significant barriers for behaviour change, but they can also be levered to promote more sustainable behaviours. If the final goal of transport policies is to promote sustainable travel it is important to gain a comprehensive insight into the different psychological motives for car use. More research into the relative importance of the three different types of outcomes, the relationships between them and the effectiveness of interventions targeting the different aspects is needed in order to help develop more effective sustainable transport policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1998). Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision-making or a matter of habit? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1355–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anable, J., & Gatersleben, B. (2005). All work and no play? The positive utility of travel for work compared to leisure journeys. Transportation Research Part A, 39, 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2008). Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H. (2004). Are you what you have? The Psychologist, 17(4), 206–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, M., & Searle, R. (2010). Effect of manipulated prestige-car ownership on both sex attractiveness ratings. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eek, D., Loukopoulos, P., Fujii, S., & Gärling, T. (2002). Spill-over effects of intermittent costs for defection in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W., Wener, R., & Phillips, D. (2002). The morning rush hour, predictability and commuter stress. Environment and Behavior, 34, 521–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraine, G., Smith, S. G., Zinkiewicz, L., Chapman, R., & Sheehan, M. (2007). At home on the road? Can drivers’ relationships with their cars be associated with territoriality? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 204–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B. (2007). Affective and symbolic aspects of car use: A review. In T. Gärling & L. Steg (Eds.), Threats to the quality of urban life from car traffic: Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 219–234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B. (2011). The car as a material possession: Exploring the link between materialism and car ownership and use. In K. Lucas, E. Blumenberg, & R. Weinberger (Eds.), Auto motives. Understanding car use behaviours (pp. 137–150). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B., & Appleton, K. (2007). Contemplating cycling to work: Attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change. Transportation Research Part A, 41, 302–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B., & Haddad, H. (2010). Who is the typical bicyclist? Transportation Research Part F, 13, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B., & Steg, L. (2012). Affective and symbolic aspects of environmental behaviour. In L. Steg, J. de Groot, & A. van den Berg (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction (pp. 165–174). Chichester, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2007). The journey to work: Exploring commuter mood among driver, cyclists, walkers and users of public transport. Environment and Behavior, 39, 416–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock, R., Macintyre, S., Kearns, A., & Ellaway, A. (2002). Means of transport and ontological security: Do cars provide psycho-social benefits to their users? Transportation Research Part D, 7, 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson, C. (2007). Instrumental aspects of car use: A review. In T. Gärling & L. Steg (Eds.), Threats to the quality of urban life from car traffic: Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 205–218). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1999). Passion and heart in transport – A sociological analysis on transport behaviour. Transport Policy, 6, 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, A. N. (1998). Commute variability and strain. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2002). Road rage: Drivers’ understandings and experiences. Journal of Sociology, 38(3), 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, E., & Abraham, C. (2006). The role of affect in UK commuters’ travel mode choices: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, P., & Collett, P. (1986). Driving passion: The psychology of the car. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (2001). How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research Part A, 35, 695–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh, N., Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2012a). Multiple identities and travel mode choice for regular journeys. Transportation Research Part F, 15, 514–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh, N., Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2012b). Self-identity threat and resistance to change: Evidence from regular travel behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 318–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M., & Küller, R. (2000). Travel behaviour and environmental concern. Transportation Research Part D, 5, 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, A., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L. (2005). Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and aflective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A, 39, 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Slotegraaf, G. (2001). Instrumental-reasoned and symbolic-affective motives for using a motor car. Transportation Research Part F, 4, 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, G., & Hallett, S. (1992). The role of advertising and the car. Transport Reviews, 12, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stradling, S. G., Meadows, M. L. & Beatty, S. (1999). Factors affecting car use choices. Unpublished study, Napier University, Transport Research Institute, Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: a social structural version. Menlo Park, CA, Benjiamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M., Van Lange, P. A. M., Meertens, R. M., & Joireman, J. A. (1996). How a structural solution to a real-world social dilemma failed: A field experiment on the first carpool lane. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken, B., Walker, I., Davis, A., & Jurasek, M. (2008). Context change and travel mode choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C., Hendrickx, L., & Steg, L. (1993). A social dilemmas analysis of motorised-transport problems and six general strategies for social behaviour change. In European Conference of Ministers of Transport (Ed.), Transport policy and global warming (pp. 209–225). Paris: European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, R., Devine-Wright, P., & Mill, G. (2007). Comparing and combining psychological theories to explain environmentally significant behaviour: The case of commuting. Environment and Behavior, 39, 731–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wener, R., & Evans, G. W. (2010). Comparing stress of car and train commuters. Transportation Research Part F, 14, 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK

    Birgitta Gatersleben

Authors
  1. Birgitta Gatersleben
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgitta Gatersleben .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden

    Tommy Gärling

  2. Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Dick Ettema

  3. SAMOT/CTF, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden

    Margareta Friman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gatersleben, B. (2014). Psychological Motives for Car Use. In: Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M. (eds) Handbook of Sustainable Travel. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7034-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation