Skip to main content

Innovations in Organisational and Community Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Design Charrette

Abstract

Human beings have an extraordinary capacity to self-organise and accomplish great results. We have proven so since ancient history. Mankind also has an amazing capability to learn collaboratively and to create innovative solutions by combining a diversity of multiple perspectives, brains, personalities and ideas. Despite overwhelming evidence of the effectiveness of self-organising systems, the dominant approach to organising and design is top-down, structured and planned. In this chapter the argument is made that the dominant mental model and approach in organisations and in learning are ineffective in the face of most of the challenges people and organisations need to handle today. An alternative way of thinking and acting is needed to effectively deal with adaptive challenges. One possible alternative model is that of self-organisation and collaborative learning. The dominant mental model will be explained first, then a framework will be introduced which helps discern in which circumstances this model is effective and which circumstances require a different mind-set. Then self-organisation is offered as an alternative mind-set. When self-organisation is applied to knowledge creation and innovation, “collaborative learning” is discussed as mental model and as a set of methodologies. The argument will be made that collaborative learning methods have proven to create novel solutions to wicked problems, enabling input from many and diverse stakeholders, establishing ownership and alignment and doing all this more efficiently than traditional top-down learning models. The chapter will draw on research and publications on the nature of learning in social contexts, organisational and system change, chaos theory and complexity theory. In addition the author’s professional experience in Organisational and Leadership Development in The Netherlands, Australia and New Zealand provides a source of data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Please note that the metaphor itself of the transmission device with a ‘sender’ and a ‘receiver’ is highly mechanistic.

References

  • Argyris, C. (1992). On organizational learning. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1975). Platform for change. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design – How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The World Café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, B. B., & Alban, B. T. (1997). Large group interventions: Engaging the whole system for rapid change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: Science, society and the rising culture. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and scope – The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge/London: The Belknapp Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, R. C., & Ashby, R. W. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science, 1(2), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative Inquiry in organizational life. In W. Pasmore & R. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organization change and development (pp. 129–169). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., Barrett, F., & Srivastva, S. (1995). Social construction and appreciative inquiry: A journey in organizational theory. In D. Hosking, P. Dachler, & K. Gergen (Eds.), Management and organization: Relational alternatives to individualism (pp. 157–200). Aldershot: Avebury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J. M. (2008). Appreciative inquiry handbook: For leaders of change. San Francisco/Brunswick: Berret-Koehler/Crown Custom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18(1), 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz, R. A., & Linski, M. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homan, T. (1998). Large scale interventions. Breukelen: Nijenrode Organisational Learning Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homan, T. (2001). Teamleren: Theorie en facilitatie. Schoonhoven: Academic Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homan, T. (2005). Organisatiedynamica. Den Haag: SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraybill, R., & Wright, E. (2006). Cool tools for hot topics: Group tools to facilitate meetings when things are hot. Intercourse: Good Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S. (2006). The hole in the wall: Self-organising systems in education. New Delhi/New York: Tata-McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. M. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J., & Wetzels, R. (1997). Niets nieuws onder de zon en andere toevalligheden: Strategie uit chaos. Amsterdam: Business Contact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R. W. (1980). Action learning: New techniques for management. London: Blond and Briggs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London: Report to the UK Secretary of State for Education and Employment and the UK Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R. (2009). Adaptation to climate change: A spatial challenge. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R. (2012). Swarming landscapes: The art of designing for climate adaptation. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1999). Strategic management & organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity. New York: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swieringa, J., & Wierdsma, A. F. M. (1990). Op weg naar een Lerende Organisatie. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M. J. (2006). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Vos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vos, L. (2014). Innovations in Organisational and Community Learning. In: Roggema, R. (eds) The Design Charrette. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7031-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics