Skip to main content

The Design Charrette

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Design Charrette

Abstract

The term ‘charrette’ is originally from France. At the end of the nineteenth century the Architectural Faculty of the Ecole des Beaux-Arts issued problems that were so difficult few students could successfully complete them in the time allowed. As the deadline approached, a pushcart (or charrette in French) was wheeled past students’ work-spaces in order to collect their final drawings for jury critiques while students frantically put finishing touches on their work. To miss ‘the charrette’ meant an automatic grade of zero.

In this chapter the design charrette is defined and the key characteristics and benefits are elaborated. Further, the diversity of design charrettes is explored and the key dimensions of charrettes are defined. Finally, a proposal for framing design charrettes is launched.

[shuh-ret]

A gathering of people for an intense period of brainstorming and design. Faced with a problem or challenge the participants pool their talents to produce plans to achieve a goal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2003). Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79(4), 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadland Land Group. (2010). The Belmore Park Charrette. Norwich: Broadland Land Group. From http://belmorepark.info/docs/Broadland%20park%20precharrette_download.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2011.

  • Condon, P. M. (2008). Design charrettes for sustainable communities. Washington/Covelo/London: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condon, P., Owen, S. M., & Miller, N. (2009). Sustainability by design, City of North Vancouver, 100 Year Sustainability Vision. Vancouver: City of North Vancouver. At: http://www.cnv.org/c/data/3/541/100%20Year%20Sustainability%20Vision.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2011.

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. London: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davy, B. (2008). Plan it without a condom! Planning Theory, 7(3), 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DLG. (2005). Presentatie Schetsschuit Haarveld. Haarzuilens: DLG.

    Google Scholar 

  • DLG. (2009). Schetsschuit Middengebied Eindhoven-Helmond. Naar een Robuuste Groenblauwe Infrastructuur. Tilburg: DLG.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, B. (2005). De-constructing the City of Culture: The long term cultural legacies of Glasgow 1990. Review Issue of Urban Studies, 42(5/6), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multilevel perspective and a case study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 681–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink, the power of thinking without thinking. New York/Boston: Little, brown & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grontmij. (2010). K2: Klimaat en Krimp in Rurale Gebieden in Noord Nederland. Assen: Ontwerpatelier Grounds for Change, Provincies Friesland, Groningen en Drenthe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lab R+E+M. (2008). Grounds for change. Assen: Dierenpark Emmen, Provincie Drenthe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennertz, B., & Lutzenhiser, A. (2006). The charrette handbook. The essential guide for accelerated collaborative community planning. Chicago: The American Planning Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity, the emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York/London/Toronto/Sydney: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyseth, T., Pløger, J., & Holm, T. (2010). Planning beyond the horizon: The Tromsø experiment. Planning Theory, 9(3), 223–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opticon Design Inc. & Lisa Wise Consulting Inc. (2009). Our Flagstaff. Land development code rewrite: Charrette summary report. Flagstaff: Flagstaff City Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polman, H. (2010). Een duurzame A28. Assen: Ontwerpatelier Grounds for Change, Provincie Drenthe en Regiovisie Groningen-Assen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provincie Drenthe. (2006a). Grounds for change Hunzedal Borger. Assen: Provincie Drenthe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provincie Drenthe. (2006b). Grounds for Change Typisch Vries in Drenthe “de ruggen op, de beken uit”. Assen: Provincie Drenthe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provincie Drenthe. (2008). Grounds for change: Typisch Vries in Drenthe: “de ruggen op, de beken uit”. Assen: Provincie Drenthe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R. (2009a). DESIGN, Hotspot Climate Proof Groningen (Final report). Groningen: Province of Groningen and Climate Changes Spatial Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R. (Ed.). (2009b). INCREASE II, Proceedings of the second international conference on renewable energy approaches for the spatial environment. Groningen: UIBE and Province of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2006, April 17–21). A green heart in a red belt. A Bridging to the Future Design Charrette in Jinze, Province of Shanghai, District of Qingpu, Jinze Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R., Mallon, W., Sergeev, V., & Swaving, G.-J. (2008). INCREASE I; Towards a climate proof energy system in Groningen. Spatial impact of adjustments to the future energy system. Groningen/Wageningen: Provincie Groningen and Klimaat voor Ruimte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R., & Boneschansker, O. (2010). INCREASE II; Final report of the second international conference on renewable energy approaches for the spatial environment; Towards a zero fossil energy region in 2050. Groningen: UIBE and Province of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggema, R., Martin, J., & Horne, R. (2011, December, 6–9). Sharing the climate adaptive dream: The benefits of the charrette approach. In: P. Dalziel (Ed.), Proceedings ANZRSAI conference. Canberra. Canterbury: AERU Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Sustainable Communities Initiative. (2010). Charrette series report. Brochure accessed September 26, 2011, from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/260590/0105938.pdf

  • Sikkema, J., & Lucius, A. (2010). Van dierenpark naar mensenpark. Assen: Ontwerpatelier Grounds for Change, Provincie Drenthe en Gemeente Emmen.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of British Columbia. (2004). The Squamish Downtown Waterfront (DRAFT) Concept Plan. Squamish and Fraser Basin Council Vancouver. From http://squamish.ca/files/Squamish%20Downtown%20Waterfront%20Concept%20Plan%20sm.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2011.

  • Van Dam, F., & Noorman, K. J. (Eds.). (2005, May 25–30). Grounds for change: Bridging energy planning and spatial design strategies (Charrette Report). Groningen: Grounds for Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, A. (2010). Kiemland. Assen: Ontwerpatelier Grounds for Change, Provincie Drenthe en Gemeente Meppel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddenvereniging. (2009). Schetsschuit Zuidwest Ameland. Veiligheid en Natuur Hand in Hand. Harlingen: Waddenvereniging.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddenvereniging. (2010). Schetsschuit Texel. Naareen Klimaatbestendige Waterhuishouding. Harlingen: Waddenvereniging.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign: Wolfram Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2012). Categorisation of countries based on income classes. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups#Low_income. Accessed 3 Jan 2013.

Useful Websites

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Roggema .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix I: Categorisation of Countries Based on Income Classes (World Bank 2012)

Appendix I: Categorisation of Countries Based on Income Classes (World Bank 2012)

Low-income economies ($1,025 or less)

Lower-middle-income economies ($1,026 to $4,035)

Upper-middle-income economies ($4,036 to $12,475)

High-income economies ($12,476 or more)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roggema, R. (2014). The Design Charrette. In: Roggema, R. (eds) The Design Charrette. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7031-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics