Skip to main content

The UK Research Excellence Framework and the Transformation of Research Production

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reforming Higher Education

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 41))

Abstract

The Research Excellence Framework (REF) is being introduced by the Higher Education Funding Council for England as the new system for assessing the quality of research in United Kingdom higher education institutions. It will replace the existing Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). The aim of this chapter is to discuss the policy intentions of research evaluation systems of this sort and whether they are likely to lead to the transformation of processes of research production within higher education institutions or whether they are more likely to reinforce existing practices and traditions. We will adopt a theoretical perspective which draws upon the transformation of the modes of knowledge production, the emergence of new science regimes regarding reliable and post-academic science and the issue of epistemic cultures. We will discuss how discourses promoted by evaluation systems such as the REF which involve a growing focus on ‘assessment’, ‘quality’ and ‘impact’ are transforming (or not) research production in higher education institutions and whether the REF can be seen as a truly ‘new’ discourse or rather as a reinforcement of certain existing ones. We also attempt to draw some conclusions about the kinds of research likely to be linked and privileged by the REF and their implications for future research and knowledge production within higher education systems subject to such evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to the HEFCE official website, an equality and diversity advisory group (E&DAG) has been established to advise on ways to strengthen the equalities and diversity measures in the REF. This includes advice on: the process for recruiting expert panels; definitions of staff eligibility and of individual staff circumstances; guidance to institutions on codes of practice for staff selections; the strategy for monitoring staff selection; processes for handling of individual staff circumstances: the scope for promoting equalities through the assessment of the research environment; equalities guidance to expert panels; the equalities implications of using citation information; the equalities implications of assessing the impact of research.

  2. 2.

    “The new public space where science and society, the market and politics, co-mingle, because of its association with the original Agora in the city-states of ancient Greece and also because we needed a novel, and expansive, term for a space that transcends the categorisation of modernity” (Nowotny et al. 2004: 203).

References

  • Cronin, B. (2003). Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures. Paper presented at the scholarly tribes and tribulations: How tradition and technology are driving disciplinary change. Association of Research Libraries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, J. (1993). The disorder of things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, L. (2006). Scholarship and the research and teaching nexus. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university. New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 108–118). Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research into contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (Ed.). (1974). Positivism and sociology. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2009). Report on the pilot exercise to develop bibliometric indicators for the Research Excellence Framework.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2010). Research excellence framework impact pilot exercise: Findings of the expert panels. A report to the UK higher education funding bodies by the chairs of the impact pilot panels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2011). Decision on assessing research impact. Retrieved December 16, 2011, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/pubs/2011/01_11/

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures. How the sciences makes knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, A. (2001). Higher education dilemmas and the quest for identity: Politics, knowledge and education in an era of transition. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2004). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, S., & Coleman, S. (2005). Ratings in the research assessment exercise 2001 – The patterns of university status and panel membership. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(2), 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, S. B. (2011). The ‘Academic Community’ and the transformation of modes of knowledge production. A disciplinary, institutional, professional and generational study. PhD thesis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of University of Porto, Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1984). Probabilistic metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • University and Colleges Union. (2009). UCU policy briefing: Research excellence framework. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=4383

  • Ziman, J. (1994). Prometheus bound. Science in a dynamic steady state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (2000). Real science. What it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofia Branco Sousa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sousa, S.B., Brennan, J.L. (2014). The UK Research Excellence Framework and the Transformation of Research Production. In: Musselin, C., Teixeira, P. (eds) Reforming Higher Education. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 41. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7028-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics